scholarly journals Concerted activities of Mcm4, Sld3 and Dbf4 in control of origin activation and DNA replication fork progression

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Jun Sheu ◽  
Justin B Kinney ◽  
Bruce Stillman
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Regulatory Domain ◽  
Checkpoint Control ◽  
Origin Firing ◽  
Replication Fork Progression ◽  
Late Origin

Eukaryotic chromosomes initiate DNA synthesis from multiple replication origins in a temporally specific manner during S phase. The replicative helicase Mcm2-7 functions in both initiation and fork progression and thus is an important target of regulation. Mcm4, a helicase subunit, possesses an unstructured regulatory domain that mediates control from multiple kinase signaling pathways, including the Dbf4-dependent Cdc7 kinase (DDK). Following replication stress in S phase, Dbf4 and Sld3, an initiation factor and essential target of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase (CDK), are targets of the checkpoint kinase Rad53 for inhibition of initiation from origins that have yet to be activated, so-called late origins. Here, whole genome DNA replication profile analysis is employed to access under various conditions the effect of mutations that alter the Mcm4 helicase regulatory domain and the Rad53 targets, Sld3 and Dbf4. Late origin firing occurs under genotoxic stress when the controls on Mcm4, Sld3 and Dbf4 are simultaneously eliminated. The regulatory domain of Mcm4 plays an important role in the timing of late origin firing, both in an unperturbed S phase and dNTP limitation. Furthermore, checkpoint control of Sld3 impacts fork progression under replication stress. This effect is parallel to the role of the Mcm4 regulatory domain in monitoring fork progression. Hypomorph mutations in sld3 are suppressed by a mcm4 regulatory domain mutation. Thus, in response cellular conditions, the functions executed by Sld3, Dbf4 and the regulatory domain of Mcm4 intersect to control origin firing and replication fork progression, thereby ensuring genome stability.

scholarly journals Checkpoint regulation of replication forks: global or local?

2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 1701-1705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Divya Ramalingam Iyer ◽  
Nicholas Rhind
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Origin Firing ◽  
Replication Fork Progression ◽  
Late Origin ◽  
Stalled Replication Forks

Cell-cycle checkpoints are generally global in nature: one unattached kinetochore prevents the segregation of all chromosomes; stalled replication forks inhibit late origin firing throughout the genome. A potential exception to this rule is the regulation of replication fork progression by the S-phase DNA damage checkpoint. In this case, it is possible that the checkpoint is global, and it slows all replication forks in the genome. However, it is also possible that the checkpoint acts locally at sites of DNA damage, and only slows those forks that encounter DNA damage. Whether the checkpoint regulates forks globally or locally has important mechanistic implications for how replication forks deal with damaged DNA during S-phase.

scholarly journals Set1-dependent H3K4 methylation becomes critical for DNA replication fork progression in response to changes in S phase dynamics in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christophe de La Roche Saint-André ◽  
Vincent Géli
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Genetic Material ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
H3k4 Methylation ◽  
Origin Firing ◽  
Phase Dynamics

AbstractDNA replication is a highly regulated process that occurs in the context of chromatin structure and is sensitive to several histone post-translational modifications. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the histone methylase Set1 is responsible for the transcription-dependent deposition of H3K4 methylation (H3K4me) throughout the genome. Here we show that a combination of a hypomorphic replication mutation (orc5-1) with the absence of Set1 (set1Δ) compromises the progression through S phase, and this is associated with a large increase in DNA damage. The ensuing DNA damage checkpoint activation, in addition to that of the spindle assembly checkpoint, restricts the growth of orc5-1 set1Δ. Interestingly, orc5-1 set1Δ is sensitive to the lack of RNase H activity while a reduction of histone levels is able to counterbalance the loss of Set1. We propose that the recently described Set1-dependent mitigation of transcription-replication conflicts becomes critical for growth when the replication forks accelerate due to decreased origin firing in the orc5-1 background. Furthermore, we show that an increase of reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, likely a consequence of the elevated DNA damage, is partly responsible for the lethality in orc5-1 set1Δ.Author summaryDNA replication, that ensures the duplication of the genetic material, starts at discrete sites, termed origins, before proceeding at replication forks whose progression is carefully controlled in order to avoid conflicts with the transcription of genes. In eukaryotes, DNA replication occurs in the context of chromatin, a structure in which DNA is wrapped around proteins, called histones, that are subjected to various chemical modifications. Among them, the methylation of the lysine 4 of histone H3 (H3K4) is carried out by Set1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, specifically at transcribed genes. We report that, when the replication fork accelerates in response to a reduction of active origins, the absence of Set1 leads to accumulation of DNA damage. Because H3K4 methylation was recently shown to slow down replication at transcribed genes, we propose that the Set1-dependent becomes crucial to limit the occurrence of conflicts between replication and transcription caused by replication fork acceleration. In agreement with this model, stabilization of transcription-dependent structures or reduction histone levels, to limit replication fork velocity, respectively exacerbates or moderates the effect of Set1 loss. Last, but not least, we show that the oxidative stress associated to DNA damage is partly responsible for cell lethality.

scholarly journals Mms1 and Mms22 stabilize the replisome during replication stress

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (13) ◽  
pp. 2396-2408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica A. Vaisica ◽  
Anastasija Baryshnikova ◽  
Michael Costanzo ◽  
Charles Boone ◽  
Grant W. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
E3 Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Replication Fork Progression ◽  
Binding Partners ◽  
Efficient Recovery ◽  
Stalled Replication Forks

Mms1 and Mms22 form a Cul4Ddb1-like E3 ubiquitin ligase with the cullin Rtt101. In this complex, Rtt101 is bound to the substrate-specific adaptor Mms22 through a linker protein, Mms1. Although the Rtt101Mms1/Mms22ubiquitin ligase is important in promoting replication through damaged templates, how it does so has yet to be determined. Here we show that mms1Δ and mms22Δ cells fail to properly regulate DNA replication fork progression when replication stress is present and are defective in recovery from replication fork stress. Consistent with a role in promoting DNA replication, we find that Mms1 is enriched at sites where replication forks have stalled and that this localization requires the known binding partners of Mms1—Rtt101 and Mms22. Mms1 and Mms22 stabilize the replisome during replication stress, as binding of the fork-pausing complex components Mrc1 and Csm3, and DNA polymerase ε, at stalled replication forks is decreased in mms1Δ and mms22Δ. Taken together, these data indicate that Mms1 and Mms22 are important for maintaining the integrity of the replisome when DNA replication forks are slowed by hydroxyurea and thereby promote efficient recovery from replication stress.

scholarly journals Histone deacetylases 1 and 2 maintain S-phase chromatin and DNA replication fork progression

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Srividya Bhaskara ◽  
Vincent Jacques ◽  
James R Rusche ◽  
Eric N Olson ◽  
Bradley R Cairns ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Histone Deacetylases ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Fork Progression

scholarly journals Activation of the DNA Damage Checkpoint in Mutants Defective in DNA Replication Initiation

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 4374-4382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ling Yin ◽  
Alexandra Monica Locovei ◽  
Gennaro D'Urso
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Origin Firing ◽  
Dna Replication Initiation ◽  
Fork Stalling ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

In the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, blocks to DNA replication elongation trigger the intra-S phase checkpoint that leads to the activation of the Cds1 kinase. Cds1 is required to both prevent premature entry into mitosis and to stabilize paused replication forks. Interestingly, although Cds1 is essential to maintain the viability of mutants defective in DNA replication elongation, mutants defective in DNA replication initiation require the Chk1 kinase. This suggests that defects in DNA replication initiation can lead to activation of the DNA damage checkpoint independent of the intra-S phase checkpoint. This might result from reduced origin firing that leads to an increase in replication fork stalling or replication fork collapse that activates the G2 DNA damage checkpoint. We refer to the Chk1-dependent, Cds1-independent phenotype as the rid phenotype (for replication initiation defective). Chk1 is active in rid mutants, and rid mutant viability is dependent on the DNA damage checkpoint, and surprisingly Mrc1, a protein required for activation of Cds1. Mutations in Mrc1 that prevent activation of Cds1 have no effect on its ability to support rid mutant viability, suggesting that Mrc1 has a checkpoint-independent role in maintaining the viability of mutants defective in DNA replication initiation.

scholarly journals Chk1 inhibits replication factory activation but allows dormant origin firing in existing factories

2010 ◽  
Vol 191 (7) ◽  
pp. 1285-1297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Quan Ge ◽  
J. Julian Blow
Keyword(s):  
Replication Fork ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Apparent Contrast ◽  
Origin Firing ◽  
Checkpoint Kinases ◽  
Replicative Stress ◽  
Replication Fork Progression ◽  
Replication Factory ◽  
Low Levels ◽  
Fork Stalling

Replication origins are licensed by loading MCM2-7 hexamers before entry into S phase. However, only ∼10% of licensed origins are normally used in S phase, with the others remaining dormant. When fork progression is inhibited, dormant origins initiate nearby to ensure that all of the DNA is eventually replicated. In apparent contrast, replicative stress activates ataxia telangiectasia and rad-3–related (ATR) and Chk1 checkpoint kinases that inhibit origin firing. In this study, we show that at low levels of replication stress, ATR/Chk1 predominantly suppresses origin initiation by inhibiting the activation of new replication factories, thereby reducing the number of active factories. At the same time, inhibition of replication fork progression allows dormant origins to initiate within existing replication factories. The inhibition of new factory activation by ATR/Chk1 therefore redirects replication toward active factories where forks are inhibited and away from regions that have yet to start replication. This minimizes the deleterious consequences of fork stalling and prevents similar problems from arising in unreplicated regions of the genome.

scholarly journals Replication fork dynamics and the DNA damage response

2012 ◽  
Vol 443 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca M. Jones ◽  
Eva Petermann
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Developmental Defects ◽  
Replication Fork Progression ◽  
Damage Response

Prevention and repair of DNA damage is essential for maintenance of genomic stability and cell survival. DNA replication during S-phase can be a source of DNA damage if endogenous or exogenous stresses impair the progression of replication forks. It has become increasingly clear that DNA-damage-response pathways do not only respond to the presence of damaged DNA, but also modulate DNA replication dynamics to prevent DNA damage formation during S-phase. Such observations may help explain the developmental defects or cancer predisposition caused by mutations in DNA-damage-response genes. The present review focuses on molecular mechanisms by which DNA-damage-response pathways control and promote replication dynamics in vertebrate cells. In particular, DNA damage pathways contribute to proper replication by regulating replication initiation, stabilizing transiently stalled forks, promoting replication restart and facilitating fork movement on difficult-to-replicate templates. If replication fork progression fails to be rescued, this may lead to DNA damage and genomic instability via nuclease processing of aberrant fork structures or incomplete sister chromatid separation during mitosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document