scholarly journals Actin filament oxidation by MICAL1 suppresses protections from cofilin-induced disassembly

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo Wioland ◽  
Stéphane Frémont ◽  
Bérengère Guichard ◽  
Arnaud Echard ◽  
Antoine Jégou ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTProteins of the ADF/cofilin family play a central role in the disassembly of actin filaments, and their activity must be tightly regulated in cells. Recently, the oxidation of actin filaments by the enzyme MICAL1 was found to amplify the severing action of cofilin through unclear mechanisms. Two essential factors normally prevent filament disassembly: the inactivation of cofilin by phosphorylation, and the protection of filaments by tropomyosins, but whether actin oxidation might interfere with these safeguard mechanisms is unknown. Using single filament experiments in vitro, we found that actin filament oxidation by MICAL1 increases, by several orders of magnitude, both cofilin binding and severing rates, explaining the dramatic synergy between oxidation and cofilin for filament disassembly. Remarkably, we found that actin oxidation bypasses the need for cofilin activation by dephosphorylation. Indeed, non-activated, phosphomimetic S3D-cofilin binds and severs oxidized actin filaments rapidly, in conditions where non-oxidized filaments are unaffected. Finally, tropomyosin Tpm1.8 loses its ability to protect filaments from cofilin severing activity when actin is oxidized by MICAL1. Together, our results show that MICAL1-induced oxidation of actin filaments suppresses their physiological protection from the action of cofilin. We propose that in cells, direct post-translational modification of actin filaments by oxidation is a way to trigger their severing, in spite of being decorated by tropomyosin, and without requiring the activation of cofilin.

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 649-664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pirta Hotulainen ◽  
Eija Paunola ◽  
Maria K. Vartiainen ◽  
Pekka Lappalainen

Actin-depolymerizing factor (ADF)/cofilins are small actin-binding proteins found in all eukaryotes. In vitro, ADF/cofilins promote actin dynamics by depolymerizing and severing actin filaments. However, whether ADF/cofilins contribute to actin dynamics in cells by disassembling “old” actin filaments or by promoting actin filament assembly through their severing activity is a matter of controversy. Analysis of mammalian ADF/cofilins is further complicated by the presence of multiple isoforms, which may contribute to actin dynamics by different mechanisms. We show that two isoforms, ADF and cofilin-1, are expressed in mouse NIH 3T3, B16F1, and Neuro 2A cells. Depleting cofilin-1 and/or ADF by siRNA leads to an accumulation of F-actin and to an increase in cell size. Cofilin-1 and ADF seem to play overlapping roles in cells, because the knockdown phenotype of either protein could be rescued by overexpression of the other one. Cofilin-1 and ADF knockdown cells also had defects in cell motility and cytokinesis, and these defects were most pronounced when both ADF and cofilin-1 were depleted. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching analysis and studies with an actin monomer-sequestering drug, latrunculin-A, demonstrated that these phenotypes arose from diminished actin filament depolymerization rates. These data suggest that mammalian ADF and cofilin-1 promote cytoskeletal dynamics by depolymerizing actin filaments and that this activity is critical for several processes such as cytokinesis and cell motility.


2021 ◽  
Vol 220 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Romet-Lemonne ◽  
Antoine Jégou

The turnover of actin filament networks in cells has long been considered to reflect the treadmilling behavior of pure actin filaments in vitro, where only the pointed ends depolymerize. Newly discovered molecular mechanisms challenge this notion, as they provide evidence of situations in which growing and depolymerizing barbed ends coexist.


2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (15) ◽  
pp. 2299-2302 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Brieher

The actin cytoskeleton is constantly assembling and disassembling. Cells harness the energy of these turnover dynamics to drive cell motility and organize cytoplasm. Although much is known about how cells control actin polymerization, we do not understand how actin filaments depolymerize inside cells. I briefly describe how the combination of imaging actin filament dynamics in cells and using in vitro biochemistry progressively altered our views of actin depolymerization. I describe why I do not think that the prevailing model of actin filament turnover—cofilin-mediated actin filament severing—can account for actin filament disassembly detected in cells. Finally, I speculate that cells might be able to tune the mechanism of actin depolymerization to meet physiological demands and selectively control the stabilities of different actin arrays.


2020 ◽  
pp. jbc.RA120.015863
Author(s):  
Venukumar Vemula ◽  
Tamás Huber ◽  
Marko Ušaj ◽  
Beáta Bugyi ◽  
Alf Mansson

Actin is a major intracellular protein with key functions in cellular motility, signaling and structural rearrangements. Its dynamic behavior, such as polymerisation and depolymerisation of actin filaments in response to intra- and extracellular cues, is regulated by an abundance of actin binding proteins. Out of these, gelsolin is one of the most potent for filament severing. However, myosin motor activity also fragments actin filaments through motor induced forces, suggesting that these two proteins could cooperate to regulate filament dynamics and motility. To test this idea, we used an in vitro motility assay, where actin filaments are propelled by surface-adsorbed heavy meromyosin (HMM) motor fragments. This allows studies of both motility and filament dynamics using isolated proteins. Gelsolin, at both nanomolar and micromolar Ca2+ concentration, appreciably enhanced actin filament severing caused by HMM-induced forces at 1 mM MgATP, an effect that was increased at higher HMM motor density. This finding is consistent with cooperativity between actin filament severing by myosin-induced forces and by gelsolin. We also observed reduced sliding velocity of the HMM-propelled filaments in the presence of gelsolin, providing further support of myosin-gelsolin cooperativity. Total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy based single molecule studies corroborated that the velocity reduction was a direct effect of gelsolin-binding to the filament and revealed different filament severing pattern of stationary and HMM propelled filaments. Overall, the results corroborate cooperative effects between gelsolin-induced alterations in the actin filaments and changes due to myosin motor activity leading to enhanced F-actin severing of possible physiological relevance.


2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 1821-1833 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yujie Li ◽  
Jenna R. Christensen ◽  
Kaitlin E. Homa ◽  
Glen M. Hocky ◽  
Alice Fok ◽  
...  

The actomyosin contractile ring is a network of cross-linked actin filaments that facilitates cytokinesis in dividing cells. Contractile ring formation has been well characterized in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, in which the cross-linking protein α-actinin SpAin1 bundles the actin filament network. However, the specific biochemical properties of SpAin1 and whether they are tailored for cytokinesis are not known. Therefore we purified SpAin1 and quantified its ability to dynamically bind and bundle actin filaments in vitro using a combination of bulk sedimentation assays and direct visualization by two-color total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy. We found that, while SpAin1 bundles actin filaments of mixed polarity like other α-actinins, SpAin1 has lower bundling activity and is more dynamic than human α-actinin HsACTN4. To determine whether dynamic bundling is important for cytokinesis in fission yeast, we created the less dynamic bundling mutant SpAin1(R216E). We found that dynamic bundling is critical for cytokinesis, as cells expressing SpAin1(R216E) display disorganized ring material and delays in both ring formation and constriction. Furthermore, computer simulations of initial actin filament elongation and alignment revealed that an intermediate level of cross-linking best facilitates filament alignment. Together our results demonstrate that dynamic bundling by SpAin1 is important for proper contractile ring formation and constriction.


2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (35) ◽  
pp. 17336-17344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zsombor Balassy ◽  
Anne-Marie Lauzon ◽  
Lennart Hilbert

Global changes in the state of spatially distributed systems can often be traced back to perturbations that arise locally. Whether such local perturbations grow into global changes depends on the system geometry and the spatial spreading of these perturbations. Here, we investigate how different spreading behaviors of local perturbations determine their global impact in 1-dimensional systems of different size. Specifically, we assessed sliding arrest events in in vitro motility assays where myosins propel actin, and simulated the underlying mechanochemistry of myosins that bind along the actin filament. We observed spontaneous sliding arrest events that occurred more frequently for shorter actin filaments. This observation could be explained by spontaneous local arrest of myosin kinetics that stabilizes once it spreads throughout an entire actin filament. When we introduced intermediate concentrations of the actin cross-linker filamin, longer actin was arrested more frequently. This observation was reproduced by simulations where filamin binding induces persistent local arrest of myosin kinetics, which subsequently spreads throughout the actin filament. A spin chain model with nearest-neighbor coupling reproduced key features of our experiments and simulations, thus extending to other linear systems with nearest-neighbor coupling the following conclusions: 1) perturbations that are persistent only once they spread throughout the system are more effective in smaller systems, and 2) perturbations that are persistent upon their establishment are more effective in larger systems. Beyond these general conclusions, our work also provides a theoretical model of collective myosin kinetics with a finite range of mechanical coupling along the actin filament.


2009 ◽  
Vol 184 (2) ◽  
pp. 269-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Staiger ◽  
Michael B. Sheahan ◽  
Parul Khurana ◽  
Xia Wang ◽  
David W. McCurdy ◽  
...  

Metazoan cells harness the power of actin dynamics to create cytoskeletal arrays that stimulate protrusions and drive intracellular organelle movements. In plant cells, the actin cytoskeleton is understood to participate in cell elongation; however, a detailed description and molecular mechanism(s) underpinning filament nucleation, growth, and turnover are lacking. Here, we use variable-angle epifluorescence microscopy (VAEM) to examine the organization and dynamics of the cortical cytoskeleton in growing and nongrowing epidermal cells. One population of filaments in the cortical array, which most likely represent single actin filaments, is randomly oriented and highly dynamic. These filaments grow at rates of 1.7 µm/s, but are generally short-lived. Instead of depolymerization at their ends, actin filaments are disassembled by severing activity. Remodeling of the cortical actin array also features filament buckling and straightening events. These observations indicate a mechanism inconsistent with treadmilling. Instead, cortical actin filament dynamics resemble the stochastic dynamics of an in vitro biomimetic system for actin assembly.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markku Hakala ◽  
Hugo Wioland ◽  
Mari Tolonen ◽  
Antoine Jegou ◽  
Guillaume Romet-Lemonne ◽  
...  

AbstractCoordinated polymerization of actin filaments provides force for cell migration, morphogenesis, and endocytosis. Capping Protein (CP) is central regulator of actin dynamics in all eukaryotes. It binds actin filament (F-actin) barbed ends with high affinity and slow dissociation kinetics to prevent filament polymerization and depolymerization. In cells, however, CP displays remarkably rapid dynamics within F-actin networks, but the underlying mechanism has remained enigmatic. We report that a conserved cytoskeletal regulator, twinfilin, is responsible for CP’s rapid dynamics and specific localization in cells. Depletion of twinfilin led to stable association of CP with cellular F-actin arrays and its treadmilling throughout leading-edge lamellipodium. These were accompanied by diminished F-actin disassembly rates. In vitro single filament imaging approaches revealed that twinfilin directly promotes dissociation of CP from filament barbed ends, while allowing subsequent filament depolymerization. These results uncover an evolutionary conserved bipartite mechanism that controls how actin cytoskeleton-mediated forces are generated in cells.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo Wioland ◽  
Antoine Jegou ◽  
Guillaume Romet-Lemonne

ABSTRACTActin Depolymerizing Factor (ADF)/cofilin is the main protein family promoting the disassembly of actin filaments, which is essential for numerous cellular functions. ADF/cofilin proteins disassemble actin filaments through different reactions, as they bind to their sides, sever them, and promote the depolymerization of the resulting ADF/cofilin-saturated filaments. Moreover, the efficiency of ADF/cofilin is known to be very sensitive to pH. ADF/cofilin thus illustrates two challenges in actin biochemistry: separating the different regulatory actions of a single protein, and characterizing them as a function of specific biochemical conditions. Here, we investigate the different reactions of ADF/cofilin on actin filaments, over four different values of pH ranging from pH 6.6 to pH 7.8, using single filament microfluidics techniques. We show that lowering pH reduces the effective filament severing rate by increasing the rate at which filaments become saturated by ADF/cofilin, thereby reducing the number of ADF/cofilin domain boundaries, where severing can occur. The severing rate per domain boundary, however, remains unchanged at different pH values. The ADF/cofilin-decorated filaments (refered to as “cofilactin” filaments) depolymerize from both ends. We show here that, at physiological pH (pH 7.0 to 7.4), the pointed end depolymerization of cofilactin filaments is barely faster than that of bare filaments. In contrast, cofilactin barbed ends undergo an “unstoppable” depolymerization (depolymerizing for minutes despite the presence of free actin monomers and capping protein in solution), throughout our range of pH. We thus show that, at physiological pH, the main contribution of ADF/cofilin to filament depolymerization is at the barbed end.A number of key cellular processes rely on the proper assembly and disassembly of actin filament networks 1. The central regulator of actin disassembly is the ADF/cofilin protein family 2, 3, which comprises three isoforms in mammals: cofilin-1 (cof1, found in nearly all cell types), cofilin-2 (cof2, found primarily in muscles) and Actin Depolymerization Factor (ADF, found mostly in neurons and epithelial cells). We refer to them collectively as “ADF/cofilin”.Over the years, the combined efforts of several labs have led to the following understanding of actin filament disassembly by ADF/cofilin. Molecules of ADF/cofilin bind stoechiometrically 4, 5 to the sides of actin filaments, with a strong preference for ADP-actin subunits 6–10. Though ADF/cofilin molecules do not contact each other 11, they bind in a cooperative manner, leading to the formation of ADF/cofilin domains on the filaments 5, 7, 9, 12, 13. Compared to bare F-actin, the filament portions decorated by ADF/cofilin (refered to as “cofilactin”) are more flexible 14, 15 and exhibit a shorter right-handed helical pitch, with a different subunit conformation 11, 16–19. Thermal fluctuations are then enough to sever actin filaments at (or near) domain boundaries8, 9, 13, 20, 21. Cofilactin filaments do not sever, but depolymerize from both ends 13 thereby renewing the actin monomer pool.ADF/cofilin thus disassembles actin filaments through the combination of different actions. As such, it vividly illustrates a current challenge in actin biochemistry: identifying and quantifying the multiple reactions involving a single protein. This is a very difficult task for bulk solution assays, where a large number of reactions take place simultaneously, and single-filament techniques have played a key role in deciphering ADF/cofilin’s actions 9, 13, 20, 22–24. In particular, the microfluidics-based method that we have developed over the past years, is a powerful tool for such investigations 25. It has recently allowed us to quantify the kinetics of the aforementioned reactions, and to discover that ADF/cofilin-saturated filament (cofilactin) barbed ends can hardly stop depolymerizing, even when ATP-G-actin and capping protein are present in solution 13.In addition, ADF/cofilin is very sensitive to pH 4, 5, 26–29. In cells, pH can be a key regulatory factor 30. It can vary between compartments, between cell types, and be specifically modulated. We can consider that a typical cytoplasmic pH would be comprised between 7.0 and 7.4. Recently, we have quantified the different reactions involving ADF/cofilin at pH 7.8 13, leaving open the question of how these reaction rates are indivdually affected by pH variations. For instance, it has been reported that ADF/cofilin is a more potent filament disassembler at higher pH values 4, 5, 26–29 but the actual impact of pH on the rate constants of individual reactions has yet to be characterized. Moreover, whether the unstoppable barbed end depolymerization that we have recently discovered for ADF/cofilin-saturated filaments at pH 7.8 13 remains significant at lower, more physiological pH values is an open question.Here, we investigate how the different contributions of ADF/cofilin (using unlabeled ADF, unlabeled cof1 and eGFP-cof1) to actin filament disassembly depend on pH, which we varied from 6.6 to 7.8. We first present the methods which we have used to do so, based on the observation of individual filaments, using microfluidics (Fig. 1). We measured cofilin’s abitility to decorate actin filament by binding to its sides (Fig. 2), and the rate at which individual cofilin domains severed actin filaments (Fig. 3). We next quantified the kinetic parameters of filament ends, for bare and ADF/cofilin-saturated (cofilactin) filaments (Fig. 4), and we specifically quantified the extent to which the barbed ends of cofilactin filaments are in a state which can hardly stop depolymerizing (Fig. 5). We finally summarize our results (Fig. 6).


2004 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 177 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Men ◽  
Y. Agca ◽  
S.F. Mullen ◽  
E.S. Critser ◽  
J.K. Critser

Disruption of the actin cytoskeleton is one of the leading causes in low survival of pig embryos after cryopreservation (Dobrinsky et al., 2000 Biol. Reprod. 62, 564–570). In this study, the effect of osmotic stress on cellular actin filament organization in porcine embryos produced in vitro was studied. Excellent quality Day 6 (fertilization=Day 0) porcine blastocysts were randomly exposed to 6 different anisosmotic sucrose solutions (75, 150, 210, 600, 1200, 2400mOsm) for 10min. Embryos were then returned to embryo culture medium (NCSU-23) after washing with NCSU-23, and cultured under 38.5°C, 5% CO2 in air with maximal humidity for them to recover. Blastocysts cultured in NCSU-23 medium (280mOsm) served as a control for embryos with intact actin filament organization. Blastocysts treated with 7.5μgmL−1 cytochalasin-b for 60min served as a control for embryos with F-actin depolymerization. Eighteen hours post-anisosmotic treatments, all blastoysts were fixed in 3.7% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 60min and stored in PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100 and 0.2% sodium azide at 4°C. Staining of actin filaments was performed according to procedures described earlier (Wang et al., 1999 Biol. Reprod. 60, 1020–1028). Embryos were blocked in PBS with 20mgmL−1 BSA and 150mM glycine for 30min. After being washed in PBS with 0.1% Tween 20 for 60min, embryos were stained with 10UmL−1 Alexa Fluor 488 phalloidin in PBS with 0.1% Tween 20 at 38.5°C for 60min, and then washed twice in PBS with 0.1% Tween 20 for 60min each. The status of actin filaments in embryonic cells was examined by confocal microscopy. Integrity of cellular actin filaments was classified as either intact or disrupted according to the distribution within embryonic cells. Blastocysts were then classified according to the status of actin filaments in embryonic cells. Data were analyzed using logistic regression. Results from 7 replicates are displayed in Table 1. There was a significant relationship between osmotic treatment levels and the probability of blastocysts with disrupted cellular actin filaments (P<0.0001). These data support the hypothesis that porcine embryos are very sensitive to osmotic changes. Ongoing experiments will assess the extent of actin disruption required to significantly reduce developmental competence of pig blastocysts. This study was supported by Monsanto Company. Table 1 Cellular actin filament integrity of in vitro produced porcine blastocysts after being treated with sucrose solutions with different osmolalities (mOsm)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document