scholarly journals Neural correlates of cognitive motor signals in primary somatosensory cortex

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matiar Jafari ◽  
Tyson NS Aflalo ◽  
Srinivas Chivukula ◽  
Spencer S Kellis ◽  
Michelle Armenta Salas ◽  
...  

AbstractClassical systems neuroscience positions primary sensory areas as early feed-forward processing stations for refining incoming sensory information. This view may oversimplify their role given extensive bi-directional connectivity with multimodal cortical and subcortical regions. Here we show that single units in human primary somatosensory cortex encode imagined reaches centered on imagined limb positions in a cognitive motor task. This result suggests a broader role of primary somatosensory cortex in cortical function than previously demonstrated.

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matiar Jafari ◽  
Tyson Aflalo ◽  
Srinivas Chivukula ◽  
Spencer Sterling Kellis ◽  
Michelle Armenta Salas ◽  
...  

AbstractClassical systems neuroscience positions primary sensory areas as early feed-forward processing stations for refining incoming sensory information. This view may oversimplify their role given extensive bi-directional connectivity with multimodal cortical and subcortical regions. Here we show that single units in human primary somatosensory cortex encode imagined reaches in a cognitive motor task, but not other sensory–motor variables such as movement plans or imagined arm position. A population reference-frame analysis demonstrates coding relative to the cued starting hand location suggesting that imagined reaching movements are encoded relative to imagined limb position. These results imply a potential role for primary somatosensory cortex in cognitive imagery, engagement during motor production in the absence of sensation or expected sensation, and suggest that somatosensory cortex can provide control signals for future neural prosthetic systems.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexia Bourgeois ◽  
Carole Guedj ◽  
Emmanuel Carrera ◽  
Patrik Vuilleumier

Selective attention is a fundamental cognitive function that guides behavior by selecting and prioritizing salient or relevant sensory information of our environment. Despite early evidence and theoretical proposal pointing to an implication of thalamic control in attention, most studies in the past two decades focused on cortical substrates, largely ignoring the contribution of subcortical regions as well as cortico-subcortical interactions. Here, we suggest a key role of the pulvinar in the selection of salient and relevant information via its involvement in priority maps computation. Prioritization may be achieved through a pulvinar- mediated generation of alpha oscillations, which may then modulate neuronal gain in thalamo-cortical circuits. Such mechanism might orchestrate the synchrony of cortico-cortical interaction, by rendering neural communication more effective, precise and selective. We propose that this theoretical framework will support a timely shift from the prevailing cortico- centric view of cognition to a more integrative perspective of thalamic contributions to attention and executive control processes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christiaan P. J. de Kock ◽  
Jean Pie ◽  
Anton W. Pieneman ◽  
Rebecca A. Mease ◽  
Arco Bast ◽  
...  

AbstractDiversity of cell-types that collectively shape the cortical microcircuit ensures the necessary computational richness to orchestrate a wide variety of behaviors. The information content embedded in spiking activity of identified cell-types remain unclear to a large extent. Here, we recorded spike responses upon whisker touch of anatomically identified excitatory cell-types in primary somatosensory cortex in naive, untrained rats. We find major differences across layers and cell-types. The temporal structure of spontaneous spiking contains high-frequency bursts (≥100 Hz) in all morphological cell-types but a significant increase upon whisker touch is restricted to layer L5 thick-tufted pyramids (L5tts) and thus provides a distinct neurophysiological signature. We find that whisker touch can also be decoded from L5tt bursting, but not from other cell-types. We observed high-frequency bursts in L5tts projecting to different subcortical regions, including thalamus, midbrain and brainstem. We conclude that bursts in L5tts allow accurate coding and decoding of exploratory whisker touch.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Schaefer ◽  
Anja Kühnel ◽  
Franziska Rumpel ◽  
Matti Gärtner

AbstractPrevious research revealed an active network of brain areas such as insula and anterior cingulate cortex when witnessing somebody else in pain and feeling empathy. But numerous studies also suggested a role of the somatosensory cortices for state and trait empathy. While recent studies highlight the role of the observer’s primary somatosensory cortex when seeing painful or nonpainful touch, the interaction of somatosensory cortex activity with empathy when receiving touch on the own body is unknown. The current study examines the relationship of touch related somatosensory cortex activity with dispositional empathy by employing an fMRI approach. Participants were touched on the palm of the hand either by the hand of an experimenter or by a rubber hand. We found that the BOLD responses in the primary somatosensory cortex were associated with empathy personality traits personal distress and perspective taking. This relationship was observed when participants were touched both with the experimenter’s real hand or a rubber hand. What is the reason for this link between touch perception and trait empathy? We argue that more empathic individuals may express stronger attention both to other’s human perceptions as well as to the own sensations. In this way, higher dispositional empathy levels might enhance tactile processing by top-down processes. We discuss possible implications of these findings.


1996 ◽  
pp. 329-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Elaine Chapman ◽  
François Tremblay ◽  
Stacey A. Ageranioti-Bélanger

Author(s):  
Matthew James Buchan ◽  
Gemma Gothard ◽  
Alexander von Klemperer ◽  
Joram J van Rheede

The posteromedial thalamus (POm) has extensive recurrent connectivity with the whisker-related primary somatosensory cortex (wS1) of rodents. However, its functional contribution to somatosensory processing in wS1 remains unclear. This article reviews several recent findings which begin to elucidate the role of POm in sensory evoked plasticity and discusses their implications for somatosensory processing.


2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 268-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guglielmo Foffani ◽  
John K. Chapin ◽  
Karen A. Moxon

Computational studies are challenging the intuitive view that neurons with broad tuning curves are necessarily less discriminative than neurons with sharp tuning curves. In the context of somatosensory processing, broad tuning curves are equivalent to large receptive fields. To clarify the computational role of large receptive fields for cortical processing of somatosensory information, we recorded ensembles of single neurons from the infragranular forelimb/forepaw region of the rat primary somatosensory cortex while tactile stimuli were separately delivered to different locations on the forelimbs/forepaws under light anesthesia. We specifically adopted the perspective of individual columns/segregates receiving inputs from multiple body location. Using single-trial analyses of many single-neuron responses, we obtained two main results. 1) The responses of even small populations of neurons recorded from within the same estimated column/segregate can be used to discriminate between stimuli delivered to different surround locations in the excitatory receptive fields. 2) The temporal precision of surround responses is sufficiently high for spike timing to add information over spike count in the discrimination between surround locations. This surround spike-timing code (i) is particularly informative when spike count is ambiguous, e.g., in the discrimination between close locations or when receptive fields are large, (ii) becomes progressively more informative as the number of neurons increases, (iii) is a first-spike code, and (iv) is not limited by the assumption that the time of stimulus onset is known. These results suggest that even though large receptive fields result in a loss of spatial selectivity of single neurons, they can provide as a counterpart a sophisticated temporal code based on latency differences in large populations of neurons without necessarily sacrificing basic information about stimulus location.


2015 ◽  
Vol 79 ◽  
pp. 246-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.R. Borich ◽  
S.M. Brodie ◽  
W.A. Gray ◽  
S. Ionta ◽  
L.A. Boyd

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Omer Massé ◽  
Sohen Blanchet-Godbout ◽  
Gilles Bronchti ◽  
Denis Boire

AbstractSensory information is conveyed from peripheral receptors through specific thalamic relays to primary areas of the cerebral cortex. Information is then routed to specialized areas for the treatment of specific aspects of the sensory signals and to multisensory associative areas. Information processing in primary sensory cortices is influenced by contextual information from top-down projections of multiple cortical motor and associative areas as well as areas of other sensory modalities and higher order thalamic nuclei. The primary sensory cortices are thus located at the interface of the ascending and descending pathways. The theory of predictive coding implies that the primary areas are the site of comparison between the sensory information expected as a function of the context and the sensory information that comes from the environment. To better understand the anatomical basis of this model of sensory systems we have charted the cortical and subcortical afferent inputs in the ipsilateral and contralateral hemispheres of the primary somatosensory cortex of adult C57Bl/6 mice. Iontophoretic injections of the b-fragment of cholera toxin were performed inside the mystacial caudal barrel field, more rostral barrel field and somatosensory cortex outside the barrel field to test the hypothesis that differences exist between these three parts and to compare their projections to the subnetworks built from the Mouse Connectome Project data. The laminar distribution of retrogradely labeled cell bodies was used to classify the projections as feedback, feedforward or lateral. Layer indices range between −1 and 1, indicating feedback and feedforward connections respectively. The primary somatosensory cortex and the barrel field have afferent connections with somatosensory areas, non-somatosensory primary sensory areas, multisensory, motor, associative, and neuromodulatory areas. The caudal part of the barrel field displays different and more abundant cortical and subcortical connections compared to the rest of the primary somatosensory cortex. Layer indices of cortical projections to the primary somatosensory cortex and the barrel field were mainly negative and very similar for ipsilateral and contralateral projections. These data demonstrate that the primary somatosensory cortex receives sensory and non-sensory information from cortical and subcortical sources.


2017 ◽  
Vol 118 (1) ◽  
pp. 317-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cédric Lenoir ◽  
Gan Huang ◽  
Yves Vandermeeren ◽  
Samar Marie Hatem ◽  
André Mouraux

The role of the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) in vibrotaction is well established. In contrast, its involvement in nociception is still debated. Here we test whether S1 is similarly involved in the processing of nonnociceptive and nociceptive somatosensory input in humans by comparing the aftereffects of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) of S1 on the event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited by nonnociceptive and nociceptive somatosensory stimuli delivered to the ipsilateral and contralateral hands. Cathodal HD-tDCS significantly affected the responses to nonnociceptive somatosensory stimuli delivered to the contralateral hand: both early-latency ERPs from within S1 (N20 wave elicited by transcutaneous electrical stimulation of median nerve) and late-latency ERPs elicited outside S1 (N120 wave elicited by short-lasting mechanical vibrations delivered to index fingertip, thought to originate from bilateral operculo-insular and cingulate cortices). These results support the notion that S1 constitutes an obligatory relay for the cortical processing of nonnociceptive tactile input originating from the contralateral hemibody. Contrasting with this asymmetric effect of HD-tDCS on the responses to nonnociceptive somatosensory input, HD-tDCS over the sensorimotor cortex led to a bilateral and symmetric reduction of the magnitude of the N240 wave of nociceptive laser-evoked potentials elicited by stimulation of the hand dorsum. Taken together, our results demonstrate in humans a differential involvement of S1 in vibrotaction and nociception. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Whereas the role of the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) in vibrotaction is well established, its involvement in nociception remains strongly debated. By assessing, in healthy volunteers, the effect of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation over S1, we demonstrate a differential involvement of S1 in vibrotaction and nociception.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document