scholarly journals Differential causal involvement of human auditory and frontal cortices in vocal motor control

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Araceli Ramirez Cardenas ◽  
Roozbeh Behroozmand ◽  
Zsuzsanna Kocsis ◽  
Phillip E Gander ◽  
Kirill V Nourski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Control ◽  
Speech Production ◽  
Auditory Feedback ◽  
Inferior Frontal Gyrus ◽  
Self Monitoring ◽  
Vocal Responses ◽  
Neurosurgical Patients ◽  
Motor Information ◽  
Auditory Cortices ◽  
Voice Fundamental Frequency

Speech motor control requires integration of sensory and motor information. Bidirectional communication between frontal and auditory cortices is crucial for speech production, self-monitoring and motor control. We used cortical direct electrical stimulation (DES) to functionally dissect audio-motor interactions underlying speech production and motor control. Eleven neurosurgical patients performed a visually cued vocal task in which a short auditory feedback perturbation was introduced during vocalization. We evaluated the effect of DES on vocal initiation, voice fundamental frequency (F0) and feedback-dependent motor control. DES of frontal sites modulated vocal onset latencies. Stimulation of different inferior frontal gyrus sites elicited either shortening or prolongation of vocal latencies. DES distinctly modulated voice F0 at different vocalization stages. Frontal and temporal areas played an important role in setting voice F0 in the first 250 ms of an utterance, while Heschls gyrus was involved later when auditory input is available for self-monitoring. Vocal responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback were mostly reduced by DES of non-core auditory cortices. Overall, we demonstrate that vocal planning and initiation are driven by frontal cortices, while feedback-dependent control relies predominantly on non-core auditory cortices. Our findings represent direct evidence of the role played by different auditory and frontal regions in vocal motor control.

scholarly journals Consistency influences altered auditory feedback processing

2019 ◽  
Vol 72 (10) ◽  
pp. 2371-2379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias K Franken ◽  
Daniel J Acheson ◽  
James M McQueen ◽  
Peter Hagoort ◽  
Frank Eisner
Keyword(s):  
Motor Control ◽  
Speech Production ◽  
Auditory Feedback ◽  
Speech Motor Control ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Feedback Processing ◽  
Motor Commands ◽  
Consistent Condition ◽  
Consistency Effect ◽  
Speech Motor

Previous research on the effect of perturbed auditory feedback in speech production has focused on two types of responses. In the short term, speakers generate compensatory motor commands in response to unexpected perturbations. In the longer term, speakers adapt feedforward motor programmes in response to feedback perturbations, to avoid future errors. The current study investigated the relation between these two types of responses to altered auditory feedback. Specifically, it was hypothesised that consistency in previous feedback perturbations would influence whether speakers adapt their feedforward motor programmes. In an altered auditory feedback paradigm, formant perturbations were applied either across all trials (the consistent condition) or only to some trials, whereas the others remained unperturbed (the inconsistent condition). The results showed that speakers’ responses were affected by feedback consistency, with stronger speech changes in the consistent condition compared with the inconsistent condition. Current models of speech-motor control can explain this consistency effect. However, the data also suggest that compensation and adaptation are distinct processes, which are not in line with all current models.

scholarly journals Dynamics of Self-monitoring and Error Detection in Speech Production: Evidence from Mental Imagery and MEG

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 352-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xing Tian ◽  
David Poeppel
Keyword(s):  
Speech Production ◽  
Mental Imagery ◽  
Error Detection ◽  
Auditory Feedback ◽  
Spectral Difference ◽  
Self Monitoring ◽  
Onset Delay ◽  
Nonmonotonic Function ◽  
Four Levels ◽  
Pitch Shift

A critical subroutine of self-monitoring during speech production is to detect any deviance between expected and actual auditory feedback. Here we investigated the associated neural dynamics using MEG recording in mental-imagery-of-speech paradigms. Participants covertly articulated the vowel /a/; their own (individually recorded) speech was played back, with parametric manipulation using four levels of pitch shift, crossed with four levels of onset delay. A nonmonotonic function was observed in early auditory responses when the onset delay was shorter than 100 msec: Suppression was observed for normal playback, but enhancement for pitch-shifted playback; however, the magnitude of enhancement decreased at the largest level of pitch shift that was out of pitch range for normal conversion, as suggested in two behavioral experiments. No difference was observed among different types of playback when the onset delay was longer than 100 msec. These results suggest that the prediction suppresses the response to normal feedback, which mediates source monitoring. When auditory feedback does not match the prediction, an “error term” is generated, which underlies deviance detection. We argue that, based on the observed nonmonotonic function, a frequency window (addressing spectral difference) and a time window (constraining temporal difference) jointly regulate the comparison between prediction and feedback in speech.

The Dynamics of Speech Motor Control Revealed with Time-Resolved fMRI

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 241-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niels Janssen ◽  
Cristian Camilo Rincón Mendieta
Keyword(s):  
Motor Control ◽  
Speech Production ◽  
Temporal Dynamics ◽  
Motor Behavior ◽  
Inferior Frontal Gyrus ◽  
Brain Networks ◽  
Fmri Data ◽  
Speech Motor Control ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Speech Motor

Abstract Holding a conversation means that speech must be started, maintained, and stopped continuously. The brain networks that underlie these aspects of speech motor control remain poorly understood. Here we collected functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data while participants produced normal and fast rate speech in response to sequences of visually presented objects. We took a non-conventional approach to fMRI data analysis that allowed us to study speech motor behavior as it unfolded over time. To this end, whole-brain fMRI signals were extracted in stimulus-locked epochs using slice-based fMRI. These data were then subjected to group independent component analysis to discover spatially independent networks that were associated with different temporal activation profiles. The results revealed two basic brain networks with different temporal dynamics: a cortical network that was activated continuously during speech production, and a second cortico-subcortical network that increased in activity during the initiation and suppression of speech production. Additional analyses explored whether key areas involved in motor suppression such as the right inferior frontal gyrus, sub-thalamic nucleus and pre-supplementary motor area provide first-order signals to stop speech. The results reveal for the first time the brain networks associated with the initiation, maintenance, and suppression of speech motor behavior.

Speech Production and Perception in a Patient with Severe Impairment of Somesthetic Perception and Motor Control

1967 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 449-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter F. MacNeilage ◽  
Thomas P. Rootes ◽  
Richard Allen Chase
Keyword(s):  
Motor Control ◽  
Speech Perception ◽  
Speech Production ◽  
Neurological Examination ◽  
Motor Behavior ◽  
Motor Information ◽  
Perceptual Performance ◽  
Motor Abnormalities ◽  
Normal Speech ◽  
Speech Motor

Studies were made of speech and other motor behavior of a 17-year-old female with severe chronic difficulties in swallowing, chewing, and speaking. Studies included: (a) physical and neurological examination; (b) phonological analysis; (c) electromyography; (d) cinefluorography; (e) non-speech motor tests; (f) tests of phoneme perception, and (g) dichotic auditory perception tests. Neurological examination revealed severe defects in complex somesthetic sensation (e.g. stereognosis). Other sensory functions, including hearing, were normal. Although motor abnormalities of extrapyramidal, cerebellar or peripheral origin were not indicated, the patient was unable to activate the several muscles required for any given speech gesture while at the same time independently controlling their various patterns of activity in normal fashion. It was concluded that this difficulty was not primarily of motor origin but resulted from congenital inability to obtain somesthetic information necessary for learning of the patterns of spatial distribution and temporal modulation of muscle contraction accompanying normal speech. Despite the severe speech production deficits, speech perception approached normality, even in some characteristics which, according to the motor theory of speech perception, are dependent on the listener’s referring to the neural correlates of normal speech motor control. Reference to normal motor information does not therefore appear necessary for these types of perceptual performance.

scholarly journals Self-monitoring in the cerebral cortex: Neural responses to small pitch shifts in auditory feedback during speech production

NeuroImage ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 179 ◽  
pp. 326-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias K. Franken ◽  
Frank Eisner ◽  
Daniel J. Acheson ◽  
James M. McQueen ◽  
Peter Hagoort ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cerebral Cortex ◽  
Speech Production ◽  
Auditory Feedback ◽  
Neural Responses ◽  
Self Monitoring ◽  
Small Pitch

Error Monitoring in People Who Stutter

1992 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 1024-1032 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert Postma ◽  
Herman Kolk
Keyword(s):  
False Alarm ◽  
White Noise ◽  
Speech Production ◽  
Error Detection ◽  
Auditory Feedback ◽  
The Self ◽  
Tape Recording ◽  
Detection Accuracy ◽  
Error Monitoring ◽  
Self Monitoring

Several theories purport that people who stutter suffer a speech-auditory feedback defect. The disordered feedback creates the illusion that some kind of error has intruded into the speech flow. Stuttering then results from actions aimed to correct the suspected, but nonexistent, error. These auditory feedback defect theories thus predict deviant error detection performance in people who stutter during speech production. To test this prediction, subjects who stuttered and those who did not had to detect self-produced (phonemic) speech errors while speaking with normal auditory feedback and with the auditory feedback masked by white noise. The two groups did not differ significantly in error detection accuracy and speed, nor in false alarm scores. This opposes auditory feedback defect theories and suggests that the self-monitoring processes of people who stutter function normally. In a condition in which errors had to be detected in other-produced speech, i.e., while listening to a tape recording, subjects who stuttered did detect fewer errors. Whether this might signal some general phonological problem is discussed.

scholarly journals Distinct neural systems for the production of communicative vocal behaviors

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
ZK Agnew ◽  
L. Ward ◽  
C. McGettigan ◽  
O. Josephs ◽  
SK. Scott
Keyword(s):  
Motor Control ◽  
Speech Production ◽  
Auditory Processing ◽  
Neural Control ◽  
Vocal Tract ◽  
Human Speech ◽  
Healthy Humans ◽  
Auditory Cortices ◽  
Cortical Regions ◽  
Parietal Cortices

AbstractVocalizations are the production of sounds by the coordinated activity of up to eighty respiratory and laryngeal muscles. Whilst voiced acts, modified by the upper vocal tract (tongue, jaw, lip and palate) are central to the production of human speech, they are also central to the production of emotional vocalizations such as sounds of disgust, anger, laughter and crying. Evidence suggests that the speech and emotional vocalizations may comprise distinct classes of vocal movements: patients with speech production deficits are often able to produce emotional vocalizations. In addition to this, the ontogeny of the two articulations is largely distinct, with some culturally universal emotional vocalizations emerging soon after birth and human speech being a culture specific, highly learnt motor act, which must develop to some degree before a critical period in development. Here we investigate the motor pathways underlying these two classes of vocal movements for the first time by directly comparing BOLD responses during production of speech and non-speech vocal movements. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we report distinct patterns of activity in both subcortical and cortical regions (putamen and bilateral inferior frontal and parietal cortices) during the production of emotional vocalizations compared to speech production. In contrast we show that responses in primary sensorimotor regions do not differ during the production of speech and emotional vocalizations, suggesting partially overlapping, and partially non-overlapping neural structures for the motor control of these two classes of movement. In addition to this we report that responses in auditory cortices are distinct during the production of speech and non-speech vocalizations, suggesting that feedback control of speech and emotional vocalizations are distinct. These data provide novel evidence for the presence of dual pathways for the neural control of complex articulatory movements in humans. These findings are discussed in relation to the clinical and primate literature of vocal motor control.Significance StatementThis work marks the first evidence in healthy humans for dual routes to vocal behaviors. Clinical evidence suggests that patients unable to produce speech may still be able to produce other vocal behaviors that employ the same set of effectors. Here we demonstrate that the production of different classes of vocal behavior is associated with overlapping and distinct networks of activity. Moreover, we show that auditory processing that occurs during the production of these movements may be distinct, suggesting that feedback may be used differently for these distinct classes of vocal movement.

Motor theory modulated by task load: strategies of phonological processing in frontal aphasia revealed by tDCS over the LIFG

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lílian Rodrigues de Almeida ◽  
Paul A. Pope ◽  
Peter Hansen
Keyword(s):  
Speech Perception ◽  
Speech Production ◽  
Phonological Processing ◽  
Inferior Frontal Gyrus ◽  
Dorsal Stream ◽  
Superior Temporal Gyrus ◽  
Motor Theory ◽  
Task Load ◽  
Cathodal Tdcs ◽  
The Individual

In our previous studies we supported the claim that the motor theory is modulated by task load. Motoric participation in phonological processing increases from speech perception to speech production, with the endpoints of the dorsal stream having changing and complementary weightings for processing: the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) being increasingly relevant and the left superior temporal gyrus (LSTG) being decreasingly relevant. Our previous results for neurostimulation of the LIFG support this model. In this study we investigated whether our claim that the motor theory is modulated by task load holds in (frontal) aphasia. Person(s) with aphasia (PWA) after stroke typically have damage on brain areas responsible for phonological processing. They may present variable patterns of recovery and, consequently, variable strategies of phonological processing. Here these strategies were investigated in two PWA with simultaneous fMRI and tDCS of the LIFG during speech perception and speech production tasks. Anodal tDCS excitation and cathodal tDCS inhibition should increase with the relevance of the target for the task. Cathodal tDCS over a target of low relevance could also induce compensation by the remaining nodes. Responses of PWA to tDCS would further depend on their pattern of recovery. Responses would depend on the responsiveness of the perilesional area, and could be weaker than in controls due to an overall hypoactivation of the cortex. Results suggest that the analysis of motor codes for articulation during phonological processing remains in frontal aphasia and that tDCS is a promising diagnostic tool to investigate the individual processing strategies.

Self-monitoring in speech production: effects of verbal hallucinations and negative symptoms

1994 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 749-761 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Leudar ◽  
P. Thomas ◽  
M. Johnston
Keyword(s):  
Speech Production ◽  
Error Detection ◽  
Negative Symptoms ◽  
Self Monitoring ◽  
Acoustic Feedback ◽  
Production Effects ◽  
Internal Error

SynopsisThis paper reports results of a study on self-monitoring in speech production. Thirty schizophrenics, varying in verbal hallucination and in negative symptoms status, and 17 controls were tested on the reporter test. The position of interruptions of the speech-flow to repair errors was used to indicate whether the detection of the errors was through monitoring of internal phonetic plans or through external acoustic feedback. We have found that the internal error detection was twice as frequent in controls as in schizophrenics. The relevance of this finding to Frith's (1992) model of schizophrenia is discussed. Our conclusion is that the problem with internal monitoring of phonetic plans is common to all schizophrenics, and not just to those with verbal hallucinations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document