scholarly journals Nurses’ burnout and associated risk factors during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petros Galanis ◽  
Irene Vraka ◽  
Despoina Fragkou ◽  
Angeliki Bilali ◽  
Daphne Kaitelidou
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Social Support ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Care ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Maslach Burnout Inventory ◽  
Self Confidence ◽  
Associated Risk Factors

AbstractBackgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, physical and mental health of the nurses is greatly challenged since they work under unprecedented pressure and they are more vulnerable to the harmful effects of the disease.AimTo examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on nurses’ burnout and to identify associated risk factors.MethodsWe followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines for this systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest and pre-print services (medRχiv and PsyArXiv) were searched from January 1, 2020 to November 15, 2020 and we removed duplicates. We applied a random effect model to estimate pooled effects since the heterogeneity between results was very high.FindingsFourteen studies, including 17,390 nurses met the inclusion criteria. Five standardized and valid questionnaires were used to measure burnout among nurses; Maslach Burnout Inventory, Copenhagen Burnout Inventory, Professional Quality of Life Scale version 5, Mini-Z, and Spanish Burnout Inventory. The overall prevalence of emotional exhaustion was 34.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 22.5-46.6%), of depersonalization was 12.6% (95% CI: 6.9-19.7%), and of lack of personal accomplishment was 15.2% (95% CI: 1.4-39.8%). The following factors were associated with increased nurses’ burnout: younger age, higher educational level, higher degree, decreased social support, having a relative/friend diagnosed with COVID-19, low family and colleagues readiness to cope with COVID-19 outbreak, increased perceived threat of Covid-19, longer working time in quarantine areas, working in a high-risk environment (a COVID-19 designated hospital, a COVID-19 unit, etc.), working in hospitals with inadequate and insufficient material and human resources, decreased working safety while caring for COVID-19 patients, increased workload, decreased self-confidence in self-protection, and lower levels of specialized training regarding COVID-19, job experience, and self-confidence in caring for COVID-19.ConclusionNurses experience high levels of burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic, while several sociodemographic, social and occupational factors affect this burnout. Several interventions need to be implemented to mitigate mental health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on nurses, e.g. screening for mental health illness and early supportive interventions for high-risk nurses, immediate access to mental health care services, social support to reduce feelings of isolation, sufficient personal protective equipment for all nurses to provide security etc. Governments, health care organizations and policy makers should act in this direction to prepare health care systems, individuals and nurses for a better response against the COVID-19 pandemic.

Global prevalence and associated risk factors of diarrheagenic Giardia duodenalis in HIV/AIDS patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 105202
Author(s):  
Farzad Mahdavi ◽  
Morteza Shams ◽  
Alireza Sadrebazzaz ◽  
Laya Shamsi ◽  
Mostafa Omidian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Giardia Duodenalis ◽  
Aids Patients ◽  
Global Prevalence ◽  
Associated Risk Factors ◽  
Hiv Aids

scholarly journals Prevalence and Risk Factors of Depression in Chinese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Protocol of Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaobo LIU ◽  
Chao Dong ◽  
Hong Jiang ◽  
Dongling Zhong ◽  
Yuxi Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Early Detection ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prevalence Of Depression ◽  
Associated Risk Factors

Abstract Background: The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is growing in China. Both physical and psychological complications occur along with the development of T2DM. The patients with depression account for a significant proportion of T2DM. Depressive symptoms interfere with blood glucose management, leading to poorer treatment outcome and even relate to the occurrence of other serious complications of T2DM population. Among these T2DM patients with depression, early detection and treatment is essential and effective. Knowledge of the current prevalence of depression in T2DM patients as well as associated risk factors may be meaningful for healthcare planning. Therefore, we plan to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the Chinese prevalence of depression in T2DM and explore associated risk factors.Methods: We will search literatures recorded in MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database (VIP), and Wanfang database (Wanfang Data). The grey literatures and reference list will be manually searched. We will include population-based, cross-sectional surveys that investigated the Chinese prevalence of depression in T2DM or/and researched the possible risk factors. Two reviewers will screen studies, extract data and evaluate quality independently. We will assess inter-rater agreement between reviewers for study inclusion, data extraction, and study quality assessment using Kappa statistics. The primary outcome will be the pooled Chinese prevalence of depression in T2DM patients. The secondary outcome will contain the potential risk factors for depression in patients with T2DM. R software (version 3.6.1) and STATA software (version 12) will be used for data analysis.Discussion: This systematic review will provide comprehensive evidence of the Chinese prevalence and risk factors of depression in patients with T2DM. we expect to provide evidence basis for healthcare practitioners and policy makers to pay attention to the mental health of T2DM. Our data will highlight the need and importance of early detection and intervention for depression in patients with T2DM. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42020182979.

scholarly journals Prevalence of HIV in Different High-Risk Groups and Associated Risk Factors in Pakistan. A Systematic Review from 2010 to 2020

2021 ◽  
Vol 04 (03) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aswa Gondal ◽  
Mahrukh Rasheed ◽  
Sana Ali ◽  
Zain Ul Abdin ◽  
Omar Rahim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Associated Risk Factors

scholarly journals Psychological therapy for inpatients receiving acute mental health care: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials

2018 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 453-472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Paterson ◽  
Thanos Karatzias ◽  
Adele Dickson ◽  
Sean Harper ◽  
Nadine Dougall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Mental Health Care ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Psychological Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trials

scholarly journals Worry from contracting COVID-19 infection and its stigma among Egyptian health care providers

2022 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Doaa Mohamed Osman ◽  
Fatma R. Khalaf ◽  
Gellan K. Ahmed ◽  
Ahmed Y. Abdelbadee ◽  
Ahmed M. Abbas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Health Care ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
High Impact ◽  
Severe Illness ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Internalized Shame ◽  
High Discrimination

Abstract Backgrounds Healthcare providers (HCPs) in COVID-19 epidemic face stressful workload of disease management, shortage of protective equipment and high risk of infection and mortality. These stressors affect greatly their mental health. The aim is to identify working conditions among Egyptian HCPs during COVID-19 epidemic as well as stigma and worry perceptions from contracting COVID-19 infection and their predictors. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted among 565 HCPs. Data was collected through Google online self-administered questionnaire comprised seven parts: demographics characteristics, knowledge and attitude of COVID-19, working condition, worry of contracting COVID-19 at work, discrimination intention at work for COVID-19 patients, stigma assessment using impact stigma, and internalized shame scales. Results The vast majority of HCPs (94.7%) were worried from contracting COVID-19 at work. Risk factors for perceiving severe worry from contracting COVID-19 were expecting infection as a severe illness, believing that infection will not be successfully controlled, improbability to continue working during the pandemic even if in a well/fit health, high discrimination intention and impact stigma scales. Significantly high impact stigma scores were detected among those aged < 30 years, females, workers primarily in sites susceptible for contracting COVID-19 infection, those had severe worry from contracting infection at work, and high internalized shame scale. The risk factors for perceiving higher internalized shame scores were not having a previous experience in working during a pandemic, high discrimination intention towards COVID-19 patients and high impact stigma scale. Conclusions Considerable levels of worry and stigma were detected among Egyptian HCPs during COVID-19 outbreak. The psychological aspect of health care providers should not be overlooked during epidemic; appropriate institutional mental health support should be provided especially for young HCPs, those without previous work experience in epidemic and those who work in high-risk units. Raising the community awareness about contribution of HCPs in fighting the epidemic might decrease stigmatization action toward HCPs.

scholarly journals Impact of coronavirus syndromes on physical and mental health of health care workers: Systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 275 ◽  
pp. 48-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo ◽  
Julio Vaquerizo-Serrano ◽  
Ana Catalan ◽  
Celso Arango ◽  
Carmen Moreno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Workers ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Physical And Mental Health ◽  
Care Workers

scholarly journals What do we know about SARS-CoV-2 transmission? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the secondary attack rate and associated risk factors

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. e0240205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wee Chian Koh ◽  
Lin Naing ◽  
Liling Chaw ◽  
Muhammad Ali Rosledzana ◽  
Mohammad Fathi Alikhan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Attack Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Associated Risk Factors
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document