scholarly journals Ribosome collision sensor Hel2 recognizes mistargeting secretory ribosome-nascent chain complexes

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshitaka Matsuo ◽  
Toshifumi Inada
Keyword(s):  
Secretory Pathway ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Physiological Role ◽  
Cellular Protein ◽  
Ribosome Profiling ◽  
Secretory Proteins ◽  
Protein Homeostasis ◽  
Chain Complexes ◽  
Nascent Chain ◽  
Endogenous Substrates

SummaryRibosome collision due to translational stalling is recognized as a problematic event in translation by E3 ubiquitin ligase Hel2, leading to non-canonical subunit dissociation followed by targeting of the faulty nascent peptides for degradation. Although Hel2-mediated quality control greatly contributes to maintaining cellular protein homeostasis, its physiological role in dealing with endogenous substrates remains unclear. This study utilized genome-wide analysis, based on selective ribosome profiling, to survey the endogenous substrates for Hel2. This survey revealed that Hel2 preferentially binds to the pre-engaged secretory ribosome-nascent-chain complexes (RNCs), which translate upstream of targeting signals. Notably, Hel2 recruitment into secretory RNCs was elevated under signal recognition particle (SRP)-deficient conditions. Moreover, the mitochondrial defects caused by insufficient SRP were enhanced by hel2 deletion, along with the mistargeting of secretory proteins into mitochondria. Collectively, these findings provide novel insights into risk management in the secretory pathway that maintains cellular protein homeostasis.

scholarly journals ER stress causes widespread protein aggregation and prion formation

2017 ◽  
Vol 216 (8) ◽  
pp. 2295-2304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norfadilah Hamdan ◽  
Paraskevi Kritsiligkou ◽  
Chris M. Grant
Keyword(s):  
Protein Aggregation ◽  
Er Stress ◽  
Secretory Pathway ◽  
Cellular Protein ◽  
Protein Homeostasis ◽  
Er Quality Control ◽  
Unfolded Protein ◽  
The Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Protein Response ◽  
Er Homeostasis

Disturbances in endoplasmic reticulum (ER) homeostasis create a condition termed ER stress. This activates the unfolded protein response (UPR), which alters the expression of many genes involved in ER quality control. We show here that ER stress causes the aggregation of proteins, most of which are not ER or secretory pathway proteins. Proteomic analysis of the aggregated proteins revealed enrichment for intrinsically aggregation-prone proteins rather than proteins which are affected in a stress-specific manner. Aggregation does not arise because of overwhelming proteasome-mediated degradation but because of a general disruption of cellular protein homeostasis. We further show that overexpression of certain chaperones abrogates protein aggregation and protects a UPR mutant against ER stress conditions. The onset of ER stress is known to correlate with various disease processes, and our data indicate that widespread amorphous and amyloid protein aggregation is an unanticipated outcome of such stress.

scholarly journals Ribosome–SRP–FtsY cotranslational targeting complex in the closed state

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (13) ◽  
pp. 3943-3948 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ottilie von Loeffelholz ◽  
Qiyang Jiang ◽  
Aileen Ariosa ◽  
Manikandan Karuppasamy ◽  
Karine Huard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Conformational Changes ◽  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Binding Pocket ◽  
Van Der Waals Interactions ◽  
Closed State ◽  
Chain Complexes ◽  
Nascent Chain ◽  
Srp Rna

The signal recognition particle (SRP)-dependent pathway is essential for correct targeting of proteins to the membrane and subsequent insertion in the membrane or secretion. In Escherichia coli, the SRP and its receptor FtsY bind to ribosome–nascent chain complexes with signal sequences and undergo a series of distinct conformational changes, which ensures accurate timing and fidelity of protein targeting. Initial recruitment of the SRP receptor FtsY to the SRP–RNC complex results in GTP-independent binding of the SRP–FtsY GTPases at the SRP RNA tetraloop. In the presence of GTP, a closed state is adopted by the SRP–FtsY complex. The cryo-EM structure of the closed state reveals an ordered SRP RNA and SRP M domain with a signal sequence-bound. Van der Waals interactions between the finger loop and ribosomal protein L24 lead to a constricted signal sequence-binding pocket possibly preventing premature release of the signal sequence. Conserved M-domain residues contact ribosomal RNA helices 24 and 59. The SRP–FtsY GTPases are detached from the RNA tetraloop and flexible, thus liberating the ribosomal exit site for binding of the translocation machinery.

scholarly journals Structure, dynamics and interactions of large SRP variants

2019 ◽  
Vol 401 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klemens Wild ◽  
Matthias M.M. Becker ◽  
Georg Kempf ◽  
Irmgard Sinning
Keyword(s):  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Domain Architecture ◽  
Particle Dynamics ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Chain Complexes ◽  
Nascent Chain ◽  
Target Membrane ◽  
Signal Anchor ◽  
Srp Rna

Abstract Co-translational protein targeting to membranes relies on the signal recognition particle (SRP) system consisting of a cytosolic ribonucleoprotein complex and its membrane-associated receptor. SRP recognizes N-terminal cleavable signals or signal anchor sequences, retards translation, and delivers ribosome-nascent chain complexes (RNCs) to vacant translocation channels in the target membrane. While our mechanistic understanding is well advanced for the small bacterial systems it lags behind for the large bacterial, archaeal and eukaryotic SRP variants including an Alu and an S domain. Here we describe recent advances on structural and functional insights in domain architecture, particle dynamics and interplay with RNCs and translocon and GTP-dependent regulation of co-translational protein targeting stimulated by SRP RNA.

scholarly journals NAC functions as a modulator of SRP during the early steps of protein targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (16) ◽  
pp. 3027-3040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Zhang ◽  
Uta Berndt ◽  
Hanna Gölz ◽  
Arlette Tais ◽  
Stefan Oellerer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Signal Sequences ◽  
Chain Complexes ◽  
Ribosomal Tunnel ◽  
Nascent Chain ◽  
Combined Data

Nascent polypeptide-associated complex (NAC) was initially found to bind to any segment of the nascent chain except signal sequences. In this way, NAC is believed to prevent mistargeting due to binding of signal recognition particle (SRP) to signalless ribosome nascent chain complexes (RNCs). Here we revisit the interplay between NAC and SRP. NAC does not affect SRP function with respect to signalless RNCs; however, NAC does affect SRP function with respect to RNCs targeted to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). First, early recruitment of SRP to RNCs containing a signal sequence within the ribosomal tunnel is NAC dependent. Second, NAC is able to directly and tightly bind to nascent signal sequences. Third, SRP initially displaces NAC from RNCs; however, when the signal sequence emerges further, trimeric NAC·RNC·SRP complexes form. Fourth, upon docking to the ER membrane NAC remains bound to RNCs, allowing NAC to shield cytosolically exposed nascent chain domains not only before but also during cotranslational translocation. The combined data indicate a functional interplay between NAC and SRP on ER-targeted RNCs, which is based on the ability of the two complexes to bind simultaneously to distinct segments of a single nascent chain.

scholarly journals Defining the physiological role of SRP in protein-targeting efficiency and specificity

Science ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 359 (6376) ◽  
pp. 689-692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Costa ◽  
Kelly Subramanian ◽  
Jodi Nunnari ◽  
Jonathan S. Weissman
Keyword(s):  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Physiological Role ◽  
Ribosome Profiling ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Amino Terminal ◽  
Mitochondrial Defects ◽  
Unanticipated Consequence

The signal recognition particle (SRP) enables cotranslational delivery of proteins for translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), but its full in vivo role remains incompletely explored. We combined rapid auxin-induced SRP degradation with proximity-specific ribosome profiling to define SRP’s in vivo function in yeast. Despite the classic view that SRP recognizes amino-terminal signal sequences, we show that SRP was generally essential for targeting transmembrane domains regardless of their position relative to the amino terminus. By contrast, many proteins containing cleavable amino-terminal signal peptides were efficiently cotranslationally targeted in SRP’s absence. We also reveal an unanticipated consequence of SRP loss: Transcripts normally targeted to the ER were mistargeted to mitochondria, leading to mitochondrial defects. These results elucidate SRP’s essential roles in maintaining the efficiency and specificity of protein targeting.

scholarly journals A pair of non-optimal codons are necessary for the correct biosynthesis of the Aspergillus nidulans urea transporter, UreA

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 190773 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Sanguinetti ◽  
Andrés Iriarte ◽  
Sotiris Amillis ◽  
Mónica Marín ◽  
Héctor Musto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aspergillus Nidulans ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Urea Transporter ◽  
Translation Rate ◽  
Synonymous Codons ◽  
Optimal Codons ◽  
Chain Complexes ◽  
Ribosomal Tunnel ◽  
Nascent Chain

In both prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes, synonymous codons are unevenly used. Such differential usage of optimal or non-optimal codons has been suggested to play a role in the control of translation initiation and elongation, as well as at the level of transcription and mRNA stability. In the case of membrane proteins, codon usage has been proposed to assist in the establishment of a pause necessary for the correct targeting of the nascent chains to the translocon. By using as a model UreA, the Aspergillus nidulans urea transporter, we revealed that a pair of non-optimal codons encoding amino acids situated at the boundary between the N -terminus and the first transmembrane segment are necessary for proper biogenesis of the protein at 37°C. These codons presumably regulate the translation rate in a previously undescribed fashion, possibly contributing to the correct interaction of ureA -translating ribosome-nascent chain complexes with the signal recognition particle and/or other factors, while the polypeptide has not yet emerged from the ribosomal tunnel. Our results suggest that the presence of the pair of non-optimal codons would not be functionally important in all cellular conditions. Whether this mechanism would affect other proteins remains to be determined.

scholarly journals Interaction mapping of the Sec61 translocon identifies two Sec61α regions interacting with hydrophobic segments in translocating chains

2018 ◽  
Vol 293 (44) ◽  
pp. 17050-17060 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuichiro Kida ◽  
Masao Sakaguchi
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Lipid Bilayer ◽  
Secretory Pathway ◽  
Cross Linking ◽  
Secretory Proteins ◽  
Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane ◽  
Conducting Channel ◽  
Nascent Chain ◽  
Biochemical Analyses ◽  
Lateral Gate

Many proteins in organelles of the secretory pathway, as well as secretory proteins, are translocated across and inserted into the endoplasmic reticulum membrane by the Sec61 translocon, a protein-conducting channel. The channel consists of 10 transmembrane (TM) segments of the Sec61α subunit and possesses an opening between TM2b and TM7, termed the lateral gate. Structural and biochemical analyses of complexes of Sec61 and its ortholog SecY have revealed that the lateral gate is the exit for signal sequences and TM segments of translocating polypeptides to the lipid bilayer and also involved in the recognition of such hydrophobic sequences. Moreover, even marginally hydrophobic (mH) segments insufficient for membrane integration can be transiently stalled in surrounding Sec61α regions and cross-linked to them, but how the Sec61 translocon accommodates these mH segments remains unclear. Here, we used Cys-scanned variants of human Sec61α expressed in cultured 293-H cells to examine which channel regions associate with mH segments. A TM segment in a ribosome-associated polypeptide was mainly cross-linked to positions at the lateral gate, whereas an mH segment in a nascent chain was cross-linked to the Sec61α pore-interior positions at TM5 and TM10, as well as the lateral gate. Of note, cross-linking at position 180 in TM5 of Sec61α was reduced by an I179A substitution. We therefore conclude that at least two Sec61α regions, the lateral gate and the pore-interior site around TM5, interact with mH segments and are involved in accommodating them.

scholarly journals Molecular Mimicry of SecA and Signal Recognition Particle Binding to the Bacterial Ribosome

mBio ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lara Knüpffer ◽  
Clara Fehrenbach ◽  
Kärt Denks ◽  
Veronika Erichsen ◽  
Narcis-Adrian Petriman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Transport ◽  
Molecular Mimicry ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Transport Systems ◽  
Secretory Proteins ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Bacterial Protein ◽  
Ribosomal Tunnel ◽  
N Terminus ◽  
Nascent Chain

ABSTRACT Bacteria execute a variety of protein transport systems for maintaining the proper composition of their different cellular compartments. The SecYEG translocon serves as primary transport channel and is engaged in transporting two different substrate types. Inner membrane proteins are cotranslationally inserted into the membrane after their targeting by the signal recognition particle (SRP). In contrast, secretory proteins are posttranslationally translocated by the ATPase SecA. Recent data indicate that SecA can also bind to ribosomes close to the tunnel exit. We have mapped the interaction of SecA with translating and nontranslating ribosomes and demonstrate that the N terminus and the helical linker domain of SecA bind to an acidic patch on the surface of the ribosomal protein uL23. Intriguingly, both also insert deeply into the ribosomal tunnel to contact the intratunnel loop of uL23, which serves as a nascent chain sensor. This binding pattern is remarkably similar to that of SRP and indicates an identical interaction mode of the two targeting factors with ribosomes. In the presence of a nascent chain, SecA retracts from the tunnel but maintains contact with the surface of uL23. Our data further demonstrate that ribosome and membrane binding of SecA are mutually exclusive, as both events depend on the N terminus of SecA. Our study highlights the enormous plasticity of bacterial protein transport systems and reveals that the discrimination between SRP and SecA substrates is already initiated at the ribosome. IMPORTANCE Bacterial protein transport via the conserved SecYEG translocon is generally classified as either cotranslational, i.e., when transport is coupled to translation, or posttranslational, when translation and transport are separated. We show here that the ATPase SecA, which is considered to bind its substrates posttranslationally, already scans the ribosomal tunnel for potential substrates. In the presence of a nascent chain, SecA retracts from the tunnel but maintains contact with the ribosomal surface. This is remarkably similar to the ribosome-binding mode of the signal recognition particle, which mediates cotranslational transport. Our data reveal a striking plasticity of protein transport pathways, which likely enable bacteria to efficiently recognize and transport a large number of highly different substrates within their short generation time.

scholarly journals Discrete nascent chain lengths are required for the insertion of presecretory proteins into microsomal membranes.

1993 ◽  
Vol 121 (6) ◽  
pp. 1211-1219 ◽  
Author(s):  
S L Wolin ◽  
P Walter
Keyword(s):  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Secretory Proteins ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Translation Arrest ◽  
Nascent Chain ◽  
Microsomal Membranes ◽  
Membrane Bound ◽  
Chain Lengths ◽  
Edta Extraction ◽  
Er Membrane

Ribosomes synthesizing nascent secretory proteins are targeted to the membrane by the signal recognition particle (SRP), a small ribonucleoprotein that binds to the signal peptide as it emerges from the ribosome. SRP arrests further elongation, causing ribosomes to stack behind the arrested ribosome. Upon interaction of SRP with its receptor on the ER membrane, the translation arrest is released and the ribosome becomes bound to the ER membrane. We have examined the distribution of unattached and membrane-bound ribosomes during the translation of mRNAs encoding two secretory proteins, bovine preprolactin and rat preproinsulin I. We find that the enhancement of ribosome stacking that occurs when SRP arrests translation of these proteins is relaxed in the presence of microsomal membranes. We also demonstrate that two previously described populations of membrane-associated ribosomes, distinguished by their sensitivity to high salt or EDTA extraction, correspond to ribosomes that have synthesized differing lengths of the nascent polypeptide. This analysis has revealed that nascent chain insertion into the membrane begins at distinct points for different presecretory proteins.

scholarly journals Ribosome Binding to and Dissociation from Translocation Sites of the Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 3860-3869 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Schaletzky ◽  
Tom A. Rapoport
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Structural Data ◽  
Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Ribosome Binding ◽  
High Affinity ◽  
Chain Complexes ◽  
Nascent Chain

We have addressed how ribosome-nascent chain complexes (RNCs), associated with the signal recognition particle (SRP), can be targeted to Sec61 translocation channels of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane when all binding sites are occupied by nontranslating ribosomes. These competing ribosomes are known to be bound with high affinity to tetramers of the Sec61 complex. We found that the membrane binding of RNC–SRP complexes does not require or cause the dissociation of prebound nontranslating ribosomes, a process that is extremely slow. SRP and its receptor target RNCs to a free population of Sec61 complex, which associates with nontranslating ribosomes only weakly and is conformationally different from the population of ribosome-bound Sec61 complex. Taking into account recent structural data, we propose a model in which SRP and its receptor target RNCs to a Sec61 subpopulation of monomeric or dimeric state. This could explain how RNC–SRP complexes can overcome the competition by nontranslating ribosomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document