scholarly journals NAC functions as a modulator of SRP during the early steps of protein targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (16) ◽  
pp. 3027-3040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Zhang ◽  
Uta Berndt ◽  
Hanna Gölz ◽  
Arlette Tais ◽  
Stefan Oellerer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Signal Sequences ◽  
Chain Complexes ◽  
Ribosomal Tunnel ◽  
Nascent Chain ◽  
Combined Data

Nascent polypeptide-associated complex (NAC) was initially found to bind to any segment of the nascent chain except signal sequences. In this way, NAC is believed to prevent mistargeting due to binding of signal recognition particle (SRP) to signalless ribosome nascent chain complexes (RNCs). Here we revisit the interplay between NAC and SRP. NAC does not affect SRP function with respect to signalless RNCs; however, NAC does affect SRP function with respect to RNCs targeted to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). First, early recruitment of SRP to RNCs containing a signal sequence within the ribosomal tunnel is NAC dependent. Second, NAC is able to directly and tightly bind to nascent signal sequences. Third, SRP initially displaces NAC from RNCs; however, when the signal sequence emerges further, trimeric NAC·RNC·SRP complexes form. Fourth, upon docking to the ER membrane NAC remains bound to RNCs, allowing NAC to shield cytosolically exposed nascent chain domains not only before but also during cotranslational translocation. The combined data indicate a functional interplay between NAC and SRP on ER-targeted RNCs, which is based on the ability of the two complexes to bind simultaneously to distinct segments of a single nascent chain.

scholarly journals Ribosome–SRP–FtsY cotranslational targeting complex in the closed state

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (13) ◽  
pp. 3943-3948 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ottilie von Loeffelholz ◽  
Qiyang Jiang ◽  
Aileen Ariosa ◽  
Manikandan Karuppasamy ◽  
Karine Huard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Conformational Changes ◽  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Binding Pocket ◽  
Van Der Waals Interactions ◽  
Closed State ◽  
Chain Complexes ◽  
Nascent Chain ◽  
Srp Rna

The signal recognition particle (SRP)-dependent pathway is essential for correct targeting of proteins to the membrane and subsequent insertion in the membrane or secretion. In Escherichia coli, the SRP and its receptor FtsY bind to ribosome–nascent chain complexes with signal sequences and undergo a series of distinct conformational changes, which ensures accurate timing and fidelity of protein targeting. Initial recruitment of the SRP receptor FtsY to the SRP–RNC complex results in GTP-independent binding of the SRP–FtsY GTPases at the SRP RNA tetraloop. In the presence of GTP, a closed state is adopted by the SRP–FtsY complex. The cryo-EM structure of the closed state reveals an ordered SRP RNA and SRP M domain with a signal sequence-bound. Van der Waals interactions between the finger loop and ribosomal protein L24 lead to a constricted signal sequence-binding pocket possibly preventing premature release of the signal sequence. Conserved M-domain residues contact ribosomal RNA helices 24 and 59. The SRP–FtsY GTPases are detached from the RNA tetraloop and flexible, thus liberating the ribosomal exit site for binding of the translocation machinery.

scholarly journals Ribosome binding induces repositioning of the signal recognition particle receptor on the translocon

2015 ◽  
Vol 211 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Kuhn ◽  
Albena Draycheva ◽  
Andreas Vogt ◽  
Narcis-Adrian Petriman ◽  
Lukas Sturm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Resonance Energy Transfer ◽  
Chain Complex ◽  
Resonance Energy ◽  
Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Ribosomal Tunnel ◽  
Nascent Chain

Cotranslational protein targeting delivers proteins to the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane or to the eukaryotic endoplasmic reticulum membrane. The signal recognition particle (SRP) binds to signal sequences emerging from the ribosomal tunnel and targets the ribosome-nascent-chain complex (RNC) to the SRP receptor, termed FtsY in bacteria. FtsY interacts with the fifth cytosolic loop of SecY in the SecYEG translocon, but the functional role of the interaction is unclear. By using photo-cross-linking and fluorescence resonance energy transfer measurements, we show that FtsY–SecY complex formation is guanosine triphosphate independent but requires a phospholipid environment. Binding of an SRP–RNC complex exposing a hydrophobic transmembrane segment induces a rearrangement of the SecY–FtsY complex, which allows the subsequent contact between SecY and ribosomal protein uL23. These results suggest that direct RNC transfer to the translocon is guided by the interaction between SRP and translocon-bound FtsY in a quaternary targeting complex.

scholarly journals Structure, dynamics and interactions of large SRP variants

2019 ◽  
Vol 401 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klemens Wild ◽  
Matthias M.M. Becker ◽  
Georg Kempf ◽  
Irmgard Sinning
Keyword(s):  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Domain Architecture ◽  
Particle Dynamics ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Chain Complexes ◽  
Nascent Chain ◽  
Target Membrane ◽  
Signal Anchor ◽  
Srp Rna

Abstract Co-translational protein targeting to membranes relies on the signal recognition particle (SRP) system consisting of a cytosolic ribonucleoprotein complex and its membrane-associated receptor. SRP recognizes N-terminal cleavable signals or signal anchor sequences, retards translation, and delivers ribosome-nascent chain complexes (RNCs) to vacant translocation channels in the target membrane. While our mechanistic understanding is well advanced for the small bacterial systems it lags behind for the large bacterial, archaeal and eukaryotic SRP variants including an Alu and an S domain. Here we describe recent advances on structural and functional insights in domain architecture, particle dynamics and interplay with RNCs and translocon and GTP-dependent regulation of co-translational protein targeting stimulated by SRP RNA.

scholarly journals The beta subunit of the signal recognition particle receptor is a transmembrane GTPase that anchors the alpha subunit, a peripheral membrane GTPase, to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane.

1995 ◽  
Vol 128 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
J D Miller ◽  
S Tajima ◽  
L Lauffer ◽  
P Walter
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Transmembrane Protein ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane ◽  
Protein Chain ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle Receptor ◽  
Er Membrane

The signal recognition particle receptor (SR) is required for the cotranslational targeting of both secretory and membrane proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane. During targeting, the SR interacts with the signal recognition particle (SRP) which is bound to the signal sequence of the nascent protein chain. This interaction catalyzes the GTP-dependent transfer of the nascent chain from SRP to the protein translocation apparatus in the ER membrane. The SR is a heterodimeric protein comprised of a 69-kD subunit (SR alpha) and a 30-kD subunit (SR beta) which are associated with the ER membrane in an unknown manner. SR alpha and the 54-kD subunits of SRP (SRP54) each contain related GTPase domains which are required for SR and SRP function. Molecular cloning and sequencing of a cDNA encoding SR beta revealed that SR beta is a transmembrane protein and, like SR alpha and SRP54, is a member of the GTPase superfamily. Although SR beta defines its own GTPase subfamily, it is distantly related to ARF and Sar1. Using UV cross-linking, we confirm that SR beta binds GTP specifically. Proteolytic digestion experiments show that SR alpha is required for the interaction of SRP with SR. SR alpha appears to be peripherally associated with the ER membrane, and we suggest that SR beta, as an integral membrane protein, mediates the membrane association of SR alpha. The discovery of its guanine nucleotide-binding domain, however, makes it likely that its role is more complex than that of a passive anchor for SR alpha. These findings suggest that a cascade of three directly interacting GTPases functions during protein targeting to the ER membrane.

scholarly journals Signal Recognition Particle-dependent Targeting of Ribosomes to the Rough Endoplasmic Reticulum in the Absence and Presence of the Nascent Polypeptide-associated Complex

1998 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Raden ◽  
Reid Gilmore
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Rough Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Chain Complex ◽  
Dual Function ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Nascent Polypeptide ◽  
Specific Attachment ◽  
Nascent Chain

Proteins with RER-specific signal sequences are cotranslationally translocated across the rough endoplasmic reticulum through a proteinaceous channel composed of oligomers of the Sec61 complex. The Sec61 complex also binds ribosomes with high affinity. The dual function of the Sec61 complex necessitates a mechanism to prevent signal sequence-independent binding of ribosomes to the translocation channel. We have examined the hypothesis that the signal recognition particle (SRP) and the nascent polypeptide-associated complex (NAC), respectively, act as positive and negative regulatory factors to mediate the signal sequence-specific attachment of the ribosome-nascent chain complex (RNC) to the translocation channel. Here, SRP-independent translocation of a nascent secretory polypeptide was shown to occur in the presence of endogenous wheat germ or rabbit reticulocyte NAC. Furthermore, SRP markedly enhanced RNC binding to the translocation channel irrespective of the presence of NAC. Binding of RNCs, but not SRP-RNCs, to the Sec61 complex is competitively inhibited by 80S ribosomes. Thus, the SRP-dependent targeting pathway provides a mechanism for delivery of RNCs to the translocation channel that is not inhibited by the nonselective interaction between the ribosome and the Sec61 complex.

scholarly journals A pair of non-optimal codons are necessary for the correct biosynthesis of the Aspergillus nidulans urea transporter, UreA

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 190773 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Sanguinetti ◽  
Andrés Iriarte ◽  
Sotiris Amillis ◽  
Mónica Marín ◽  
Héctor Musto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aspergillus Nidulans ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Urea Transporter ◽  
Translation Rate ◽  
Synonymous Codons ◽  
Optimal Codons ◽  
Chain Complexes ◽  
Ribosomal Tunnel ◽  
Nascent Chain

In both prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes, synonymous codons are unevenly used. Such differential usage of optimal or non-optimal codons has been suggested to play a role in the control of translation initiation and elongation, as well as at the level of transcription and mRNA stability. In the case of membrane proteins, codon usage has been proposed to assist in the establishment of a pause necessary for the correct targeting of the nascent chains to the translocon. By using as a model UreA, the Aspergillus nidulans urea transporter, we revealed that a pair of non-optimal codons encoding amino acids situated at the boundary between the N -terminus and the first transmembrane segment are necessary for proper biogenesis of the protein at 37°C. These codons presumably regulate the translation rate in a previously undescribed fashion, possibly contributing to the correct interaction of ureA -translating ribosome-nascent chain complexes with the signal recognition particle and/or other factors, while the polypeptide has not yet emerged from the ribosomal tunnel. Our results suggest that the presence of the pair of non-optimal codons would not be functionally important in all cellular conditions. Whether this mechanism would affect other proteins remains to be determined.

scholarly journals Direct probing of the interaction between the signal sequence of nascent preprolactin and the signal recognition particle by specific cross-linking.

1987 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Wiedmann ◽  
T V Kurzchalia ◽  
H Bielka ◽  
T A Rapoport
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Cross Linking ◽  
Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Lysine Residues ◽  
Nascent Chain

We have studied the interaction between the signal sequence of nascent preprolactin and the signal recognition particle (SRP) during the initial events in protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. A new method of affinity labeling was used, whereby lysine residues, carrying the photoreactive group 4-(3-trifluoromethyldiazirino) benzoic acid in their side chains, are incorporated into a protein by means of modified lysyl-tRNA, and cross-linking to the interacting component is induced by irradiation. SRP interacts through its Mr 54,000 polypeptide component with the signal sequences of nascent preprolactin chains containing about 70 residues, and with decreasing affinity with longer chains as well; it causes inhibition of elongation. Binding of SRP is reversible and requires the nascent chain to be bound to a functional ribosome. SRP cross-linked to the signal sequence still inhibits elongation but does not prevent it completely. We conclude that SRP does not block the exit site of the polypeptide chain on the ribosome. The SRP receptor of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane displaces the signal sequence from SRP and, even if SRP is cross-linked, releases elongation arrest.

scholarly journals Ribosome Binding to and Dissociation from Translocation Sites of the Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 3860-3869 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Schaletzky ◽  
Tom A. Rapoport
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Structural Data ◽  
Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Ribosome Binding ◽  
High Affinity ◽  
Chain Complexes ◽  
Nascent Chain

We have addressed how ribosome-nascent chain complexes (RNCs), associated with the signal recognition particle (SRP), can be targeted to Sec61 translocation channels of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane when all binding sites are occupied by nontranslating ribosomes. These competing ribosomes are known to be bound with high affinity to tetramers of the Sec61 complex. We found that the membrane binding of RNC–SRP complexes does not require or cause the dissociation of prebound nontranslating ribosomes, a process that is extremely slow. SRP and its receptor target RNCs to a free population of Sec61 complex, which associates with nontranslating ribosomes only weakly and is conformationally different from the population of ribosome-bound Sec61 complex. Taking into account recent structural data, we propose a model in which SRP and its receptor target RNCs to a Sec61 subpopulation of monomeric or dimeric state. This could explain how RNC–SRP complexes can overcome the competition by nontranslating ribosomes.

scholarly journals Protein Targeting to the Bacterial Cytoplasmic Membrane

1999 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 161-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Fekkes ◽  
Arnold J. M. Driessen
Keyword(s):  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Cytoplasmic Membrane ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Specific Interaction ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
High Fidelity ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Nascent Chain ◽  
Major Route ◽  
Mature Domain

SUMMARY Proteins that perform their activity within the cytoplasmic membrane or outside this cell boundary must be targeted to the translocation site prior to their insertion and/or translocation. In bacteria, several targeting routes are known; the SecB- and the signal recognition particle-dependent pathways are the best characterized. Recently, evidence for the existence of a third major route, the twin-Arg pathway, was gathered. Proteins that use either one of these three different pathways possess special features that enable their specific interaction with the components of the targeting routes. Such targeting information is often contained in an N-terminal extension, the signal sequence, but can also be found within the mature domain of the targeted protein. Once the nascent chain starts to emerge from the ribosome, competition for the protein between different targeting factors begins. After recognition and binding, the targeting factor delivers the protein to the translocation sites at the cytoplasmic membrane. Only by means of a specific interaction between the targeting component and its receptor is the cargo released for further processing and translocation. This mechanism ensures the high-fidelity targeting of premembrane and membrane proteins to the translocation site.

scholarly journals Integration of membrane proteins into the endoplasmic reticulum requires GTP.

1988 ◽  
Vol 107 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Wilson ◽  
T Connolly ◽  
T Morrison ◽  
R Gilmore
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Membrane Proteins ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Membrane Insertion ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Free System ◽  
Amino Terminal ◽  
Nascent Chain

We have examined the requirement for ribonucleotides and ribonucleotide triphosphate hydrolysis during early events in the membrane integration of two membrane proteins: the G protein of vesicular stomatitis virus and the hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN) glycoprotein of Newcastle disease virus. Both proteins contain a single transmembrane-spanning segment but are integrated in the membrane with opposite orientations. The G protein has an amino-terminal signal sequence and a stop-transfer sequence located near the carboxy terminus. The HN glycoprotein has a single sequence near the amino terminus that functions as both a signal-sequence and a transmembrane-spanning segment. Membrane insertion was explored using a cell-free system directed by transcribed mRNAs encoding amino-terminal segments of the two proteins. Ribosome-bound nascent polypeptides were assembled, ribonucleotides were removed by gel filtration chromatography, and the ribosomes were incubated with microsomal membranes under conditions of defined ribonucleotide content. Nascent chain insertion into the membrane required the presence of both the signal recognition particle and a functional signal recognition particle receptor. In the absence of ribonucleotides, insertion of nascent membrane proteins was not detected. GTP or nonhydrolyzable GTP analogues promoted efficient insertion, while ATP was comparatively ineffective. Surprisingly, the majority of the HN nascent chain remained ribosome associated after puromycin treatment. Ribosome-associated HN nascent chains remained competent for membrane insertion, while free HN chains were not competent. We conclude that a GTP binding protein performs an essential function during ribosome-dependent insertion of membrane proteins into the endoplasmic reticulum that is unrelated to protein synthesis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document