scholarly journals Predicting the Efficacy of COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma Donor Units with the Lumit Dx anti-Receptor Binding Domain Assay

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanath Kumar Janaka ◽  
Natasha M Clark ◽  
David T Evans ◽  
Joseph P Connor
Keyword(s):  
Receptor Binding ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Passive Immunization ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Receptor Binding Domain ◽  
S Protein ◽  
Antibody Assays ◽  
Antibody Titers ◽  
Novel Coronavirus ◽  
Design And Methods

AbstractBackgroundThe novel coronavirus SARS-CoV2 that causes COVID-19 has resulted in the death of more than 2.5 million people, but no cure exists. Although passive immunization with COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) provides a safe and viable therapeutic option, the selection of optimal units for therapy in a timely fashion remains a barrier.Study design and methodsSince virus neutralization is a necessary characteristic of plasma that can benefit recipients, the neutralizing titers of plasma samples were measured using a retroviral-pseudotype assay. Binding antibody titers to the spike (S) protein were also determined by a clinically available serological assay (Ortho-Vitros total IG), and an in-house ELISA. The results of these assays were compared to a measurement of antibodies directed to the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV2 S protein (Promega Lumit Dx).ResultsAll measures of antibodies were highly variable, but correlated, to different degrees, with each other. However, the anti-RBD antibodies correlated with viral neutralizing titers to a greater extent than the other antibody assays.DiscussionOur observations support the use of an anti-RBD assay such as the Lumit Dx assay, as an optimal predictor of the neutralization capability of CCP.

scholarly journals Predicting the efficacy of COVID-19 convalescent plasma donor units with the Lumit Dx anti-receptor binding domain assay

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. e0253551
Author(s):  
Sanath Kumar Janaka ◽  
Natasha M. Clark ◽  
David T. Evans ◽  
Huihui Mou ◽  
Michael Farzan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Receptor Binding ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Passive Immunization ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Receptor Binding Domain ◽  
S Protein ◽  
Antibody Assays ◽  
Antibody Titers ◽  
Novel Coronavirus ◽  
Design And Methods

Background The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV2 that causes COVID-19 has resulted in the death of more than 2.5 million people, but no cure exists. Although passive immunization with COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) provides a safe and viable therapeutic option, the selection of optimal units for therapy in a timely fashion remains a barrier. Study design and methods Since virus neutralization is a necessary characteristic of plasma that can benefit recipients, the neutralizing titers of plasma samples were measured using a retroviral-pseudotype assay. Binding antibody titers to the spike (S) protein were also determined by a clinically available serological assay (Ortho-Vitros total IG), and an in-house ELISA. The results of these assays were compared to a measurement of antibodies directed to the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV2 S protein (Promega Lumit Dx). Results All measures of antibodies were highly variable, but correlated, to different degrees, with each other. However, the anti-RBD antibodies correlated with viral neutralizing titers to a greater extent than the other antibody assays. Discussion Our observations support the use of an anti-RBD assay such as the Lumit Dx assay, as an optimal predictor of the neutralization capability of CCP.

scholarly journals Cross-reactive neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 by serum antibodies from recovered SARS patients and immunized animals

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (45) ◽  
pp. eabc9999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanmei Zhu ◽  
Danwei Yu ◽  
Yang Han ◽  
Hongxia Yan ◽  
Huihui Chong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome ◽  
Receptor Binding ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Full Length ◽  
Receptor Binding Domain ◽  
Serum Antibodies ◽  
Serum Samples ◽  
S Protein ◽  
Novel Coronavirus

The current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a novel coronavirus genetically close to SARS-CoV. To investigate the effects of previous SARS-CoV infection on the ability to recognize and neutralize SARS-CoV-2, we analyzed 20 convalescent serum samples collected from individuals infected with SARS-CoV during the 2003 SARS outbreak. All patient sera reacted strongly with the S1 subunit and receptor binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV; cross-reacted with the S ectodomain, S1, RBD, and S2 proteins of SARS-CoV-2; and neutralized both SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 S protein–driven infections. Analysis of antisera from mice and rabbits immunized with a full-length S and RBD immunogens of SARS-CoV verified cross-reactive neutralization against SARS-CoV-2. A SARS-CoV–derived RBD from palm civets elicited more potent cross-neutralizing responses in immunized animals than the RBD from a human SARS-CoV strain, informing strategies for development of universal vaccines against emerging coronaviruses.

scholarly journals Comparative Genomics of Receptor Binding Domains of Spike Protein and Receptor Interaction in COVID-19 Patient

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rimjhim Dasgupta
Keyword(s):  
Receptor Binding ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Host Cells ◽  
Receptor Interaction ◽  
Receptor Binding Domain ◽  
Furin Cleavage ◽  
S Protein ◽  
Human Coronaviruses ◽  
Novel Coronavirus ◽  
Bat Coronavirus

The current outbreak of viral pneumonia in the city of Wuhan, China, was caused by a novel coronavirus designated 2019-nCoV, as determined by sequencing the viral RNA genome. Among its genome, S protein is surface-exposed and mediates entry into host cells. Currently it is one of the main targets for designing antibodies (Abs), therapeutic and vaccine. Earlier studies stated that ACE2 (angiotensin converting enzyme 2) could facilitate S protein mediated entry for this newly emerged coronavirus. Here we have taken an attempt to compare the genetic structure of receptor binding domain within S protein of highly pathogenic human coronaviruses (special reference to 2019-nCoV) with Bat coronavirus RaTG13. We have compared 2019-nCov receptor binding domain (RBD) with other pathogenic human coronaviruses (MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV) and Bat coronavirus RaTG13. We found that it is closest to RaTG13 RBD than MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV. Our study shows that 2019-nCov RBD also has significant identity with pangolin S protein RBD. We have also predicted the amino acid residues within RDB those may play important role for ACE2 receptor interaction. We identified unique signature for furin cleavage in 2019-nCov S protein but not in of other pathogenic human coronaviruses (tested here), bat coronavirus RaTG13 or pangolin.

scholarly journals The Receptor Binding Domain of SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein is the result of an ancestral recombination between the bat-CoV RaTG13 and the pangolin-CoV MP789

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandro Flores-Alanis ◽  
Luisa Sandner-Miranda ◽  
Gabriela Delgado ◽  
Alejandro Cravioto ◽  
Rosario Morales-Espinosa
Keyword(s):  
Receptor Binding ◽  
Evolutionary History ◽  
Haplotype Network ◽  
Basic Function ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Receptor Binding Domain ◽  
S Protein ◽  
Parental Relationship ◽  
History Of ◽  
Novel Coronavirus

Abstract Objective: In December 2019 a novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) that is causing the current COVID-19 pandemic was identified in Wuhan, China. Many questions have been raised about its origin and adaptation to humans. In the present work we performed a genetic analysis of the Spike glycoprotein (S) of SARS-CoV-2 and other related coronaviruses (CoVs) isolated from different hosts in order to trace the evolutionary history of this protein and the adaptation of SARS-CoV-2 to humans.Results: Based on the sequence analysis of the S gene, we suggest that the origin of SARS-CoV-2 is the result of recombination events between bat and pangolin CoVs. The hybrid SARS-CoV-2 ancestor jumped to humans and has been maintained by natural selection. Although the S protein of RaTG13 bat CoV has a high nucleotide identity with the S protein of SARS-CoV-2, the phylogenetic tree and the haplotype network suggest a non-direct parental relationship between these CoVs. Moreover, it is likely that the basic function of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of S protein was acquired by the SARS-CoV-2 from the MP789 pangolin CoV by recombination and it has been highly conserved.

scholarly journals Efficacy of ancestral receptor-binding domain, S1 and trimeric spike protein vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.1.7, B.1.351, and B.1.617.1

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Yang ◽  
Jinkai Zang ◽  
Shiqi Xu ◽  
Xueyang Zhang ◽  
Sule Yuan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Receptor Binding ◽  
Immune Escape ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Prototype Strain ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Receptor Binding Domain ◽  
S Protein ◽  
Antibody Titers ◽  
Continued Use

The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The current SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are based on spike (S) protein, S1 subunit, or receptor-binding domain (RBD) of prototype strain. Emergence of several novel SARS-CoV-2 variants has raised concern about potential immune escape. In this study, we performed an immunogenicity comparison of ancestral RBD, S1, and S ectodomain trimer (S-trimer) antigens and tested the efficacy of these prototype vaccines against the circulating variants, especially B.1.617 that has been linked to India's current COVID-19 surge. We found that RBD and S-trimer proteins could induce significantly higher neutralizing antibody titers than S1 protein. For the three vaccines, the neutralizing titers decreased over time, but still remained high for at least five months after immunization. Importantly, the three prototype vaccines were still effective in neutralizing the variants of concern, although B.1.351 and B.1.617.1 lineages showed varying degrees of reduction in neutralization by the immune sera. The vaccines-induced sera were shown to block receptor binding and inhibit S protein-mediated membrane fusion. In addition, the immune sera did not promote antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) in vitro. Our work provides valuable information for development of SARS-CoV-2 subunit vaccines and also supports the continued use of ancestral RBD or S-based vaccines to fight the COVID-19 epidemic.

Role of key point Mutations in Receptor Binding Domain of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bipin Singh
Keyword(s):  
Receptor Binding ◽  
Point Mutations ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Receptor Binding Domain ◽  
Spike Glycoprotein ◽  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2 ◽  
Recent Outbreak ◽  
Novel Coronavirus ◽  
Genomic Similarity

: The recent outbreak of novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2 or 2019-nCoV) and its worldwide spread is posing one of the major threats to human health and the world economy. It has been suggested that SARS-CoV-2 is similar to SARSCoV based on the comparison of the genome sequence. Despite the genomic similarity between SARS-CoV-2 and SARSCoV, the spike glycoprotein and receptor binding domain in SARS-CoV-2 shows the considerable difference compared to SARS-CoV, due to the presence of several point mutations. The analysis of receptor binding domain (RBD) from recently published 3D structures of spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 (Yan, R., et al. (2020); Wrapp, D., et al. (2020); Walls, A. C., et al. (2020)) highlights the contribution of a few key point mutations in RBD of spike glycoprotein and molecular basis of its efficient binding with human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2).

scholarly journals Performance of a SARS CoV-2 antibody ELISA based on simultaneous measurement of antibodies against the viral nucleoprotein and receptor-binding domain

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Reiners ◽  
Carolin Schnurra ◽  
Henning Trawinski ◽  
Judith Kannenberg ◽  
Thomas Hermsdorf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Receptor Binding ◽  
Simultaneous Measurement ◽  
False Positives ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Diagnostic Sensitivity ◽  
Spike Protein ◽  
Receptor Binding Domain ◽  
Simultaneous Testing ◽  
Antibody Assays ◽  
Antibody Elisa

AbstractSARS CoV-2 antibody assays measure antibodies against the viral nucleoprotein (NP) or spike protein. The study examined if testing of antibodies against both antigens increases the diagnostic sensitivity. Sera (N=98) from infected individuals were tested with ELISAs based on the NP, receptor-binding domain (RBD), or both proteins. The AUROCs were 0.958 (NP), 0.991 (RBD), and 0.992 (NP/RBD). The RBD- and NP/RBD-based ELISAs showed better performance than the NP-based assay. Simultaneous testing for antibodies against NP and RBD increased the number of true and false positives. If maximum diagnostic sensitivity is required, the NP/RBD-based ELISA is preferable. Otherwise, the RBD-based ELISA is sufficient.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document