scholarly journals The tumor burden of metastatic colorectal cancer patients at initial diagnosis, pre- versus post-Covid-19 lockdown

Author(s):  
AR Thierry ◽  
B Pastor ◽  
E Pisareva ◽  
F Ghiringhelli ◽  
O Bouche ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic led to a significant reduction in the provision of screening, case identification and hospital referrals to cancer patients. To our knowledge, no study has yet correlated quantitatively the consequences of these limitations for cancer patient management. This study evaluates the implications of such reductions for patients newly diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in both the pre- and post-lockdown periods.MethodsWe examined 80 newly identified mCRC patients from 18 different clinical centers. These cases come from the screening procedure of a clinical trial which is using circulating DNA (cirDNA) analysis to determine their RAS and BRAF status.ResultsThe tumor burden as evaluated by the median total plasma cirDNA concentration showed a statistically higher level in patients diagnosed post-lockdown compared to those diagnosed pre-lockdown (119.2 versus 17.3 ng/mL; p<0.0001). In order to link tumor burden to survival, we compared the survival of these mCRC patients with previous studies in which cirDNA was examined in the same way (median survival, 16.2 months; median follow up, 48.7 months, N=135). Given the poor survival rate of mCRC patients with high cirDNA levels (14.7 vs 20.0 and 8.8 vs 19.3 months median survival when dichotomizing the cohort by the median cirDNA concentration 24.4 and 100 ng/mL, respectively), our study points to the potential deleterious consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic.ConclusionsRecognizing that our exploratory study offers a snapshot of an evolving situation, our observations nonetheless clearly highlight the need to determine actions which would minimize delays in diagnosis during the ongoing and future waves of COVID-19.

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. e369-e379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nele Boeckx ◽  
Ken Op de Beeck ◽  
Matthias Beyens ◽  
Vanessa Deschoolmeester ◽  
Christophe Hermans ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15043-e15043 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ciara O'Brien ◽  
Sophia Callaghan ◽  
George Papaxoinis ◽  
James Bennett ◽  
Chern Siang Lee ◽  
...  

e15043 Background: Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102), an oral combination of a nucleoside analogue and thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor, showed significant survival benefit in the RECOURSE study. We assessed TAS-102 clinical activity in an unselected patient population with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer in the UK Expanded Access Programme (EAP). Methods: Pharmacy databases were used to identify patients treated with TAS-102 on the UK EAP at three tertiary referral Cancer Centres (Manchester, Cardiff and Southampton) between December 2015 and December 2016. Case notes, laboratory tests and histopathology were reviewed to ascertain survival data and prognostic variables. Results: Of the 78 patients treated with TAS-102, median ECOG PS was 1, 56% of patients were male and median age was 64 years (range 27- 80 years). 31 patients had 3 or more metastatic sites of disease. 26 patients were RAS mutant and 1 patient was B-RAFmutant. Median number of cycles of TAS-102 was 2 cycles (range 1-11 cycles) with one third of patients requiring a dose reduction due to toxicity. 39% of patients developed grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and 12% febrile neutropenia. Response assessment was not performed in 12 patients due to death prior to assessment (6 patients) or withdrawal of patient consent for TAS-102 treatment (6 patients). Where best disease response was assessed by RECIST 1.1 criteria, 26.6% patient showed clinical benefit (stable disease or partial response) whereas 73.3% of patients had confirmed progressive disease. Median follow-up period was 5.2 months with 45 deaths in the study period. Median overall survival (OS) was 6.6 months. OS was significantly worse for patients with hypoalbuminemia (Albumin < 30g/dl) at cycle 1 day 1 TAS-102 (p = 0.028). Anaemia, renal or liver impairment and number of metastatic sites of disease had no impact on patient survival. RAS mutant colorectal cancer patients showed a trend to improved outcome on TAS-102 which did not reach statistical significance within the study follow-up period. Conclusions: TAS-102 shows modest clinical benefit in treatment refractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients on the UK expanded access programme.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Caraglia ◽  
Pierpaolo Correale ◽  
Rocco Giannicola ◽  
Nicoletta Staropoli ◽  
Cirino Botta ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 2410
Author(s):  
Chungyeop Lee ◽  
In-Ja Park ◽  
Kyung-Won Kim ◽  
Yongbin Shin ◽  
Seok-Byung Lim ◽  
...  

The effect of perioperative sarcopenic changes on prognosis remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective cohort study with 2333 non-metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated between January 2009 and December 2012 at the Asan Medical Center. The body composition at diagnosis was measured via abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) using Asan-J software. Patients underwent CT scans preoperatively, as well as at 6 months–1 year and 2–3 years postoperatively. The primary outcome was the association between perioperative sarcopenic changes and survival. According to sarcopenic criteria, 1155 (49.5%), 890 (38.2%), and 893 (38.3%) patients had sarcopenia preoperatively, 6 months–1 year, and 2–3 years postoperatively, respectively. The 5-year overall survival (OS) (95.8% vs. 92.1%, hazard ratio (HR) = 2.234, p < 0.001) and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) (93.2% vs. 86.2%, HR = 2.251, p < 0.001) rates were significantly lower in patients with preoperative sarcopenia. Both OS and RFS were lower in patients with persistent sarcopenia 2–3 years postoperatively than in those who recovered (OS: 96.2% vs. 90.2%, p = 0.001; RFS: 91.1% vs. 83.9%, p = 0.002). In multivariate analysis, postoperative sarcopenia was confirmed as an independent factor associated with decreased OS and RFS. Pre- and postoperative sarcopenia and changes in the condition during surveillance were associated with oncological outcomes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 128
Author(s):  
Silvia Galbiati ◽  
Francesco Damin ◽  
Dario Brambilla ◽  
Lucia Ferraro ◽  
Nadia Soriani ◽  
...  

It is widely accepted that assessing circular tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the plasma of cancer patients is a promising practice to evaluate somatic mutations from solid tumors noninvasively. Recently, it was reported that isolation of extracellular vesicles improves the detection of mutant DNA from plasma in metastatic patients; however, no consensus on the presence of dsDNA in exosomes has been reached yet. We analyzed small extracellular vesicle (sEV)-associated DNA of eleven metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients and compared the results obtained by microarray and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) to those reported on the ctDNA fraction. We detected the same mutations found in tissue biopsies and ctDNA in all samples but, unexpectedly, in one sample, we found a KRAS mutation that was not identified either in ctDNA or tissue biopsy. Furthermore, to assess the exact location of sEV-associated DNA (outside or inside the vesicle), we treated with DNase I sEVs isolated with three different methodologies. We found that the DNA inside the vesicles is only a small fraction of that surrounding the vesicles. Its amount seems to correlate with the total amount of circulating tumor DNA. The results obtained in our experimental setting suggest that integrating ctDNA and sEV-associated DNA in mCRC patient management could provide a complete real-time assessment of the cancer mutation status.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document