scholarly journals NLoed: A Python package for nonlinear optimal experimental design in systems biology

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Braniff ◽  
Taylor Pearce ◽  
Zixuan Lu ◽  
Michael Astwood ◽  
William SR Forrest ◽  
...  

Motivation: Modelling in systems and synthetic biology relies on accurate parameter estimates and predictions. Accurate model calibration relies, in turn, on data, and on how well-suited the available data is to a particular modelling task. Optimal experimental design (OED) techniques can be used to identify experiments and data collection procedures that will most efficiently contribute to a given modelling objective. However, implementation of OED is limited by currently available software tools that are not well-suited for the diversity of nonlinear models and non-normal data commonly encountered in biological research. Moreover, existing OED tools do not make use of the state-of-the-art numerical tools, resulting in inefficient computation. Results: Here we present the NLoed software package. NLoed is an open-source Python library providing convenient access to OED methods, with particular emphasis on experimental design for systems biology research. NLoed supports a wide variety of nonlinear, multi-input/output, and dynamic models, and facilitates modelling and design of experiments over a wide variety of data types. To support OED investigations, the NLoed package implements maximum likelihood fitting and diagnostic tools, providing a comprehensive modelling workflow. NLoed offers an accessible, modular, and flexible OED tool-set suited to the wide variety of experimental scenarios encountered in systems biology research. We demonstrate NLOED's capabilities by applying it to experimental design for characterization of a bacterial optogenetic system. Availability: NLoed is available via pip from the PyPi repository; https://pypi.org/project/nloed/. Source code, documentation and examples can be found on Github at https://github.com/ingallslab/NLoed.

SIMULATION ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 79 (12) ◽  
pp. 717-725 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Faller ◽  
U. Klingmüller ◽  
J. Timmer

Processes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
René Schenkendorf ◽  
Xiangzhong Xie ◽  
Moritz Rehbein ◽  
Stephan Scholl ◽  
Ulrike Krewer

In the field of chemical engineering, mathematical models have been proven to be an indispensable tool for process analysis, process design, and condition monitoring. To gain the most benefit from model-based approaches, the implemented mathematical models have to be based on sound principles, and they need to be calibrated to the process under study with suitable model parameter estimates. Often, the model parameters identified by experimental data, however, pose severe uncertainties leading to incorrect or biased inferences. This applies in particular in the field of pharmaceutical manufacturing, where usually the measurement data are limited in quantity and quality when analyzing novel active pharmaceutical ingredients. Optimally designed experiments, in turn, aim to increase the quality of the gathered data in the most efficient way. Any improvement in data quality results in more precise parameter estimates and more reliable model candidates. The applied methods for parameter sensitivity analyses and design criteria are crucial for the effectiveness of the optimal experimental design. In this work, different design measures based on global parameter sensitivities are critically compared with state-of-the-art concepts that follow simplifying linearization principles. The efficient implementation of the proposed sensitivity measures is explicitly addressed to be applicable to complex chemical engineering problems of practical relevance. As a case study, the homogeneous synthesis of 3,4-dihydro-1H-1-benzazepine-2,5-dione, a scaffold for the preparation of various protein kinase inhibitors, is analyzed followed by a more complex model of biochemical reactions. In both studies, the model-based optimal experimental design benefits from global parameter sensitivities combined with proper design measures.


1985 ◽  
Vol 248 (3) ◽  
pp. R378-R386 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. H. Nathanson ◽  
G. M. Saidel

Optimal experimental design is used to predict the experimental conditions that will allow the "best" estimates of model parameters. A variety of criteria must be considered before an optimal design is chosen. Maximizing the determinant of the information matrix (D optimality), which tends to produce the most precise simultaneous estimates of all parameters, is commonly considered as the primary criterion. To complement this criterion, we present another whose effect is to reduce the interaction among the parameter estimates so that changes in any one parameter can be more distinct. This new criterion consists of maximizing the determinant of an appropriately scaled information matrix (M optimality). These criteria are applied jointly in a multiple-objective function. To illustrate the use of these concepts, we develop an optimal experimental design of blood sampling schedules using a detailed ferrokinetic model.


2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (20) ◽  
pp. 2625-2632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Giovanni Busetto ◽  
Alain Hauser ◽  
Gabriel Krummenacher ◽  
Mikael Sunnåker ◽  
Sotiris Dimopoulos ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Alfredo Blakeley-Ruiz ◽  
Carlee S. McClintock ◽  
Ralph Lydic ◽  
Helen A. Baghdoyan ◽  
James J. Choo ◽  
...  

Abstract The Hooks et al. review of microbiota-gut-brain (MGB) literature provides a constructive criticism of the general approaches encompassing MGB research. This commentary extends their review by: (a) highlighting capabilities of advanced systems-biology “-omics” techniques for microbiome research and (b) recommending that combining these high-resolution techniques with intervention-based experimental design may be the path forward for future MGB research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document