scholarly journals HuluFISH non-denaturing in situ detection of genomic DNA opened by CRISPR-Cas9 Nickase and Exonuclease

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kang Han ◽  
Sheng Liu ◽  
Yongsheng Cheng
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Genomic Dna ◽  
Genetic Research ◽  
Artificial Chromosome ◽  
Heat Denaturation ◽  
Novel Method ◽  
Exonuclease Digestion ◽  
In Situ Detection ◽  
Novel Design

DNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has been widely used in diagnosis and genetic research. Traditional Bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) or oligonucleotide based probe to detect DNA in situ is only effective when the target is relatively large, usually over 150Kb DNA fragments. And it involves heat denaturation steps to open the DNA for in situ hybridization. The heat process can affect the fine structure of nuclei. Here we reported a novel method based on Cas9 nickase and exonuclease digestion of double strand DNA and permanently mark the DNA in single strand state for FISH. With this novel design, we detected non-repetitive genomic loci as small as 2Kb.

scholarly journals Physical mapping of repetitive oligonucleotides facilitates the establishment of a genome map-based karyotype to identify chromosomal variations in peanut

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Liuyang Fu ◽  
Qian Wang ◽  
Lina Li ◽  
Tao Lang ◽  
Junjia Guo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Physical Mapping ◽  
Tandem Repeats ◽  
Genetic Research ◽  
Diploid Species ◽  
Reference Sequence ◽  
A Genome ◽  
Genome Map ◽  
Chromosomal Variants

Abstract Background Chromosomal variants play important roles in crop breeding and genetic research. The development of single-stranded oligonucleotide (oligo) probes simplifies the process of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and facilitates chromosomal identification in many species. Genome sequencing provides rich resources for the development of oligo probes. However, little progress has been made in peanut due to the lack of efficient chromosomal markers. Until now, the identification of chromosomal variants in peanut has remained a challenge. Results A total of 114 new oligo probes were developed based on the genome-wide tandem repeats (TRs) identified from the reference sequences of the peanut variety Tifrunner (AABB, 2n = 4x = 40) and the diploid species Arachis ipaensis (BB, 2n = 2x = 20). These oligo probes were classified into 28 types based on their positions and overlapping signals in chromosomes. For each type, a representative oligo was selected and modified with green fluorescein 6-carboxyfluorescein (FAM) or red fluorescein 6-carboxytetramethylrhodamine (TAMRA). Two cocktails, Multiplex #3 and Multiplex #4, were developed by pooling the fluorophore conjugated probes. Multiplex #3 included FAM-modified oligo TIF-439, oligo TIF-185-1, oligo TIF-134-3 and oligo TIF-165. Multiplex #4 included TAMRA-modified oligo Ipa-1162, oligo Ipa-1137, oligo DP-1 and oligo DP-5. Each cocktail enabled the establishment of a genome map-based karyotype after sequential FISH/genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) and in silico mapping. Furthermore, we identified 14 chromosomal variants of the peanut induced by radiation exposure. A total of 28 representative probes were further chromosomally mapped onto the new karyotype. Among the probes, eight were mapped in the secondary constrictions, intercalary and terminal regions; four were B genome-specific; one was chromosome-specific; and the remaining 15 were extensively mapped in the pericentric regions of the chromosomes. Conclusions The development of new oligo probes provides an effective set of tools which can be used to distinguish the various chromosomes of the peanut. Physical mapping by FISH reveals the genomic organization of repetitive oligos in peanut chromosomes. A genome map-based karyotype was established and used for the identification of chromosome variations in peanut following comparisons with their reference sequence positions.

C-banding and fluorescence in situ hybridization studies of the wheat–alien hybrid 'Agrotana'

Genome ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 477-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Xu ◽  
R. L. Conner ◽  
A. Laroche
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Genomic Dna ◽  
Chromosome Engineering ◽  
C Banding ◽  
Chinese Spring Wheat ◽  
Mother Cells ◽  
Alien Chromatin ◽  
Chromosome Segments

'Agrotana', a wheat-alien hybrid (2n = 56), is a potential source of resistance to common root rot, stem rust, wheat streak mosaic virus, and the wheat curl mite. However, the origin of 'Agrotana', reported to be durum wheat × Agropyron trichophorum (pubescent wheatgrass), is uncertain. The objective of this investigation was to determine the chromosome constitution of 'Agrotana' using C-banding and fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques. The F1 hybrid of 'Agrotana' × 'Chinese Spring' wheat showed 7 I + 21 II in 14.9% of the pollen mother cells, evidence of the presence of the A, B, and D genomes in 'Agrotana'. The hybrid had 16 heavily C-banded chromosomes, namely 4A, and 1-7B of wheat, and a translocation that probably involved wheat chromosomes 2A and 2D. In situ hybridization using biotinylated genomic DNA of Ag. trichophorum cv. Greenleaf blocked with CS DNA failed to identify the alien chromosomes in 'Agrotana', indicating that the alien chromosomes were not likely derived from pubescent wheatgrass. In situ hybridization using labelled wheat genomic DNA blocked with 'Agrotana' DNA revealed that 'Agrotana' had 40 wheat, 14 alien, and 2 (a pair) wheat–alien translocated chromosomes. There was no homology between wheat and the alien chromosomes or chromosome segments involved in the wheat–alien recombinant. Two of the seven pairs of alien chromosomes were homoeologous to each other. The ability to identify alien chromatin in wheat using labelled wheat DNA instead of labelled alien DNA will be particularly useful in chromosome engineering of wheat germplasms having alien chromatin of unknown origin.Key words: wheat–alien hybrid, C-banding, fluorescence in situ hybridization, labelled wheat DNA as probe.

scholarly journals Chromosomal localization of human genes for arylamine N-acetyltransferase

1994 ◽  
Vol 297 (3) ◽  
pp. 441-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Hickman ◽  
A Risch ◽  
V Buckle ◽  
N K Spurr ◽  
S J Jeremiah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Yeast Artificial Chromosome ◽  
Chromosomal Localization ◽  
Artificial Chromosome ◽  
Acetylator Phenotype ◽  
Chromosome 8 ◽  
Slow Acetylator ◽  
Human Genes

Arylamine N-acetyltransferase is encoded at two loci, AAC-1 and AAC-2, on human chromosome 8. The products of the two loci are able to catalyse N-acetylation of arylamine carcinogens, such as benzidine and other xenobiotics. AAC-2 is polymorphic and individuals carrying the slow-acetylator phenotype are more susceptible to benzidine-induced bladder cancer. We have identified yeast artificial chromosome clones encoding AAC-1 and AAC-2 and have used the cloned DNAs as fluorescent probes for in situ hybridization. The hybridization patterns allow assignment of AAC-1 and AAC-2 to chromosome 8p21.3-23.1, a region in which deletions have been associated with bladder cancer [Knowles, Shaw and Proctor (1993) Oncogene 8, 1357-1364].

A rapid procedure for the isolation of C0t-1 DNA from plants

Genome ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 138-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. Zwick ◽  
Robert E. Hanson ◽  
M. Nurul Islam-Faridi ◽  
David M. Stelly ◽  
Rod A. Wing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Repetitive Dna ◽  
Copy Number ◽  
Genomic Dna ◽  
Mammalian Species ◽  
Repetitive Dnas ◽  
Rapid Procedure ◽  
Dna Elements ◽  
Repetitive Dna Elements

In situ hybridization (ISH) for the detection of single- or low-copy sequences, particularly large DNA fragments cloned into YAC or BAC vectors, generally requires the suppression or "blocking" of highly-repetitive DNAs. C0t-1 DNA is enriched for repetitive DNA elements, high or moderate in copy number, and can therefore be used more effectively than total genomic DNA to prehybridize and competitively hybridize repetitive elements that would otherwise cause nonspecific hybridization. C0t-1 DNAs from several mammalian species are commercially available, however, none is currently available for plants to the best of our knowledge. We have developed a simple 1-day procedure to generate C0t-1 DNA without the use of specialized equipment.Key words: C0t-1 DNA, in situ hybridization, BACs, plants.

Genomic in situ hybridization to sectioned nuclei shows chromosome domains in grass hybrids

1990 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 335-341
Author(s):  
A.R. Leitch ◽  
W. Mosgoller ◽  
T. Schwarzacher ◽  
M.D. Bennett ◽  
J.S. Heslop-Harrison
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Genomic Dna ◽  
Microscope Level ◽  
Hordeum Chilense ◽  
Root Tip ◽  
Interphase Nuclei ◽  
Light Microscope Level ◽  
Thin Sections ◽  
Electron Microscopes

In situ hybridization using biotinylated total genomic DNA and avidin detection systems was adapted for examination of thin-sectioned plant material in the light and electron microscopes. Root tip material was preserved prior to sectioning, so that the in vivo disposition of the chromatin was maintained. Use of total genomic DNA from Secale africanum as a probe enabled the chromatin from the two parental genomes in the grass hybrid Hordeum chilense × S. africanum to be distinguished. The biotinylated probe preferentially labelled the chromosomes of S. africanum origin. DNA-DNA hybrids were visualized at the light-microscope level by Texas Red fluorescence and at the electron-microscope level by the enzymic precipitation of DAB (diaminobenzidine) or by colloidal gold particles. The use of thin sections allowed the location of probe hybridization to be established unequivocally in both metaphase and interphase nuclei. Analysis of interphase nuclei showed that chromatin originating from the two parental genomes did not intermix but occupied distinct domains.

scholarly journals Simultaneous in situ detection of two mRNAs in the same cell using riboprobes labeled with biotin and 35S.

1990 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
pp. 917-922 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Ozden ◽  
C Aubert ◽  
D Gonzalez-Dunia ◽  
M Brahic
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Theiler's Virus ◽  
Bhk Cells ◽  
Beta Actin ◽  
Actin Mrna ◽  
High Level ◽  
Radiolabeled Probe ◽  
In Situ Detection

We used 35S-labeled and biotinylated cRNAs (riboprobes) to detect simultaneously two different mRNAs by in situ hybridization. In a first step we established the conditions under which each type of probe achieved the same high level of sensitivity. We then used these conditions to hybridize BHK cells infected with Theiler's virus, a murine picornavirus, with a mixture of a virus-specific biotinylated riboprobe and a 35S-labeled riboprobe specific for beta-actin mRNA. Both mRNAs could be detected in the same cell, although the sensitivity achieved by the radiolabeled probe was reduced by about 40% by the simultaneous hybridization with the biotinylated probe.

The interspecific genome structure of cultivated banana, Musa spp. revealed by genomic DNA in situ hybridization

2000 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. D’Hont ◽  
A. Paget-Goy ◽  
J. Escoute ◽  
F. Carreel
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Genomic Dna ◽  
Genome Structure ◽  
Musa Spp

Comparison of detection specificity of nitrifying bacteria in biofilm using fluorescence in situ hybridization and in situ fluorescent antibody methods

2003 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 129-132
Author(s):  
N. Noda ◽  
Y. Ebie ◽  
M. Matsumura ◽  
S. Tsuneda ◽  
A. Hirata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Fluorescent Antibody ◽  
Nitrifying Bacteria ◽  
Specific Fluorescence ◽  
Antibody Method ◽  
In Situ Detection ◽  
Detection Specificity ◽  
Fluorescent Antibody Method

The in situ fluorescent antibody and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) methods are very useful in the in situ detection of specific bacteria like nitrifiers in a biofilm. In this study, simultaneous staining using the FISH and in situ fluorescent antibody methods was examined. As a result, no specific fluorescence was observed with either method when FISH was performed followed by the in situ fluorescent antibody method; however, when the in situ fluorescent antibody method was performed first followed by FISH, specific fluorescence was observed in both cases. Moreover, it was suggested that the detection specificities of FISH and the in situ fluorescent antibody method are almost identical.

scholarly journals Comparison Between Integrated Genomic DNA/RNA Profiling and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in the Detection of MYC, BCL-2, and BCL-6 Gene Rearrangements in Large B-Cell Lymphomas

2019 ◽  
Vol 153 (3) ◽  
pp. 353-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel P Cassidy ◽  
Jennifer R Chapman ◽  
Rafael Lopez ◽  
Kyle White ◽  
Yao-Shan Fan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Genomic Dna ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Gene Rearrangements ◽  
B Cell Lymphomas ◽  
Rna Profiling ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract Objectives To compare fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and a commercially available sequencing assay for comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) to determine the best approach to identify gene rearrangements (GRs) in large B-cell lymphomas (LBCLs). Methods Comparison of standard-of-care FISH assays (including a two-probe approach for MYC; break-apart and fusion probes) and an integrated genomic DNA/RNA sequencing CGP approach on a set of 69 consecutive LBCL cases. Results CGP detected GRs, including those involving MYC (1), BCL-2 (3), and BCL-6 (3), not detected by FISH. FISH detected non–IgH-MYC (4) and BCL-6 (2) GRs that were not detected by CGP. In four instances, standalone CGP or FISH testing would have missed a double-hit lymphoma. Conclusions CGP was superior to FISH in the detection of IgH-MYC rearrangements but was inferior for the detection of non–IgH-MYC rearrangements. Our study demonstrates the rationale for development of a customized approach to identify GRs in LBCLs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document