scholarly journals Autoantibody and hormone activation of the thyrotropin G protein-coupled receptor

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan Faust ◽  
Isha Singh ◽  
Kaihua Zhang ◽  
Nicholas Hoppe ◽  
Antonio F.M. Pinto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Hormones ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Conformational Changes ◽  
Hormone Receptors ◽  
Transmembrane Domain ◽  
Extracellular Domain ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
Glycoprotein Hormone ◽  
Membrane Bilayer ◽  
G Protein Coupled

Thyroid hormones are vital to growth and metabolism. Thyroid hormone synthesis is controlled by thyrotropin (TSH), which acts at the thyrotropin receptor (TSHR). Autoantibodies that activate the TSHR pathologically increase thyroid hormones in Graves' disease. How autoantibodies mimic TSH function remains unclear. We determined cryogenic-electron microscopy structures of active and inactive TSHR. In inactive TSHR, the extracellular domain lies close to the membrane bilayer. TSH selects an upright conformation of the extracellular domain due to steric clashes between a conserved hormone glycan and the membrane bilayer. An activating autoantibody selects a similar upright conformation of the extracellular domain. Conformational changes in the extracellular domain are transduced to the seven transmembrane domain via a conserved hinge domain, a tethered peptide agonist, and a phospholipid that binds within the seven transmembrane domain. Rotation of the TSHR ECD relative to the membrane bilayer is sufficient for receptor activation, revealing a shared mechanism for other glycoprotein hormone receptors that may also extend to G protein-coupled receptors with large extracellular domains.

scholarly journals Structures of full-length glycoprotein hormone receptor signaling complexes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia Duan ◽  
Peiyu Xu ◽  
Xi Cheng ◽  
Chunyou Mao ◽  
Tristan Croll ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Conformational Changes ◽  
Transmembrane Domain ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
Human Reproduction ◽  
Glycoprotein Hormone ◽  
Therapeutic Drugs ◽  
Terminal Loop ◽  
Push And Pull ◽  
G Protein Coupled

Luteinizing hormone (LH) and chorionic gonadotropin (CG) are members of the glycoprotein hormone family essential to human reproduction and are important therapeutic drugs. They activate the same G protein-coupled receptor, LHCGR, by binding to the large extracellular domain (ECD). Here we report four cryo-EM structures of LHCGR, two wildtype receptor structures in the inactive and active states, and two constitutively active mutated receptor structures. The active structures are bound to CG and Gs heterotrimer, with one of the structure also containing the allosteric agonist, Org43553. The structures reveal a distinct ′push and pull′ mechanism of receptor activation, in which the ECD is pushed by the bound hormone and pulled by the extended hinge loop next to the transmembrane domain (TMD). A highly conserved 10-residue fragment (P10) from the hinge C-terminal loop at the ECD-TMD interface functions as a tethered agonist to induce conformational changes in TMD and G-protein coupling. Org43553 binds to a TMD pocket and interacts directly with P10 that further stabilizes the receptor in the active conformation. Together, these structures provide a common model for understanding glycoprotein hormone signal transduction and dysfunction, and inspire the search for clinically suitable small molecular compounds to treat endocrine diseases.

scholarly journals The Nematode Leucine-Rich Repeat-Containing, G Protein-Coupled Receptor (LGR) Protein Homologous to Vertebrate Gonadotropin and Thyrotropin Receptors is Constitutively Activated in Mammalian Cells

2000 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 272-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masataka Kudo ◽  
Thomas Chen ◽  
Koji Nakabayashi ◽  
Sheau Yu Hsu ◽  
Aaron J. W. Hsueh
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Hormone Receptors ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
Leucine Rich Repeat ◽  
Camp Production ◽  
Glycoprotein Hormone ◽  
Lh Receptor ◽  
Glycoprotein Hormone Receptors ◽  
Leucine Rich Repeats ◽  
G Protein Coupled

Abstract The receptors for LH, FSH, and TSH belong to the large G protein-coupled, seven-transmembrane (TM) protein family and are unique in having a large N-terminal extracellular (ecto-) domain containing leucine-rich repeats important for interactions with the large glycoprotein hormone ligands. Recent studies indicated the evolution of an expanding family of homologous leucine-rich repeat-containing, G protein-coupled receptors (LGRs), including the three known glycoprotein hormone receptors; mammalian LGR4 and LGR5; and LGRs in sea anemone, fly, and snail. We isolated nematode LGR cDNA and characterized its gene from the Caenorhabditis elegans genome. This receptor cDNA encodes 929 amino acids consisting of a signal peptide for membrane insertion, an ectodomain with nine leucine-rich repeats, a seven-TM region, and a long C-terminal tail. The nematode LGR has five potential N-linked glycosylation sites in its ectodomain and multiple consensus phosphorylation sites for protein kinase A and C in the cytoplasmic loop and C tail. The nematode receptor gene has 13 exons; its TM region and C tail, unlike mammalian glycoprotein hormone receptors, are encoded by multiple exons. Sequence alignments showed that the TM region of the nematode receptor has 30% identity and 50% similarity to the same region in mammalian glycoprotein hormone receptors. Although human 293T cells expressing the nematode LGR protein do not respond to human glycoprotein hormones, these cells exhibited major increases in basal cAMP production in the absence of ligand stimulation, reaching levels comparable to those in cells expressing a constitutively activated mutant human LH receptor found in patients with familial male-limited precocious puberty. Analysis of cAMP production mediated by chimeric receptors further indicated that the ectodomain and TM region of the nematode LGR and human LH receptor are interchangeable and the TM region of the nematode LGR is responsible for constitutive receptor activation. Thus, the identification and characterization of the nematode receptor provides the basis for understanding the evolutionary relationship of diverse LGRs and for future analysis of mechanisms underlying the activation of glycoprotein hormone receptors and related LGRs.

scholarly journals Characterization of Two Fly LGR (Leucine-Rich Repeat-Containing, G Protein-Coupled Receptor) Proteins Homologous to Vertebrate Glycoprotein Hormone Receptors: Constitutive Activation of Wild-Type Fly LGR1 But Not LGR2 in Transfected Mammalian Cells**This study was supported by NIH Grant HD-23273. The GenBank submission number for fly LGR2 is AF274591.

Endocrinology ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 141 (11) ◽  
pp. 4081-4090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinya Nishi ◽  
Sheau Yu Hsu ◽  
Karen Zell ◽  
Aaron J. W. Hsueh
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Hormone Receptors ◽  
Coupling Mechanism ◽  
Leucine Rich Repeat ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptor ◽  
Glycoprotein Hormone ◽  
Glycoprotein Hormone Receptors ◽  
Signaling Mechanisms ◽  
G Protein Coupled

Abstract The receptors for lutropin (LH), FSH, and TSH belong to the large G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily and are unique in having a large N-terminal extracellular (ecto-) domain important for interactions with the large glycoprotein hormone ligands. Recent studies indicated the evolution of a large family of the leucine-rich repeat-containing, G protein-coupled receptors (LGRs) with at least seven members in mammals. Based on the sequences of mammalian glycoprotein hormone receptors, we have identified a new LGR in Drosophila melanogaster and named it as fly LGR2 to distinguish it from the previously reported fly LH/FSH/TSH receptor (renamed as fly LGR1). Genomic analysis indicated the presence of 10 exons in fly LGR2 as compared with 16 exons in fly LGR1. The deduced fly LGR2 complementary DNA (cDNA) showed 43 and 64% similarity to the fly LGR1 in the ectodomain and transmembrane region, respectively. Comparison of 12 LGRs from diverse species indicated that these proteins can be divided into three subfamilies and fly LGR1 and LGR2 belong to different subfamilies. Potential signaling mechanisms were tested in human 293T cells overexpressing the fly receptors. Of interest, fly LGR1, but not LGR2, showed constitutive activity as reflected by elevated basal cAMP production in transfected cells. The basal activity of fly LGR1 was further augmented following point mutations of key residues in the intracellular loop 3 or transmembrane VI, similar to those found in patients with familial male precocious puberty. The present study reports the cloning of fly LGR2 and indicates that the G protein-coupling mechanism is conserved in fly LGR1 as compared with the mammalian glycoprotein hormone receptors. The characterization of fly receptors with features similar to mammalian glycoprotein hormone receptors allows a better understanding of the evolution of this unique group of GPCRs and future elucidation of their ligand signaling mechanisms.

scholarly journals Trans-Activation of Mutant Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptors Selectively Generates Only One of Two Hormone Signals

2004 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 968-978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inhae Ji ◽  
ChangWoo Lee ◽  
MyoungKun Jeoung ◽  
YongBum Koo ◽  
Gail A. Sievert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adenylyl Cyclase ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Hormone Receptors ◽  
Transmembrane Domain ◽  
Signal Generation ◽  
Lh Receptor ◽  
Glycosyl Phosphatidylinositol ◽  
Mutant Receptors ◽  
G Protein Coupled ◽  
Hormone Signals

Abstract Previously, we reported that a liganded LH receptor (LHR) is capable of activating itself (cis-activation) and other nonliganded LHRs to induce cAMP (trans-activation). Trans-activation of the LHR raises two crucial questions. Is trans-activation unique to LHR or common to other G protein-coupled receptors? Does trans-activation stimulate phospholipase Cβ as it does adenylyl cyclase? To address these questions, two types of novel FSH receptors (FSHRs) were constructed, one defective in hormone binding and the other defective in signal generation. The FSHR, a G protein-coupled receptor, comprises two major domains, the N-terminal extracellular exodomain that binds the hormone and the membrane-associated endodomain that generates the hormone signals. For signal defective receptors, the exodomain was attached to glycosyl phosphatidylinositol (ExoGPI) or the transmembrane domain of CD8 immune receptor (ExoCD). ExoGPI and ExoCD can trans-activate another nonliganded FSH. Surprisingly, the trans-activation generates a signal to activate either adenylyl cyclase or phospholipase Cβ, but not both. These results indicate that trans-activation in these mutant receptors is selective and limited in signal generation, thus providing new approaches to investigating the generation of different hormone signals and a novel means to selectively generate a particular hormone signal. Our data also suggest that the FSHR’s exodomain could not trans-activate LHR.

scholarly journals Dissecting the allosteric networks governing agonist efficacy and potency in G protein-coupled receptors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franziska Marie Heydenreich ◽  
Maria Marti-Solano ◽  
Manbir Sandhu ◽  
Brian K Kobilka ◽  
Michel Bouvier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Conformational Changes ◽  
Structural Changes ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
Residue Level ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptors ◽  
Maximal Response ◽  
Pharmacological Properties ◽  
Receptor Ligand ◽  
G Protein Coupled

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) translate binding of extracellular ligands into intracellular responses through conformational changes. Ligand properties are described by the maximum response (efficacy) and the agonist concentration at half-maximal response (potency). Integrating structural changes with pharmacological properties remains challenging and has not yet been performed at the resolution of individual amino acids. We use epinephrine and β2-adrenergic receptor as a model to integrate residue-level pharmacology data with intramolecular residue contact data describing receptor activation. This unveils the allosteric networks driving ligand efficacy and potency. We provide detailed insights into how structural rearrangements are linked to fundamental pharmacological properties at single-residue level in a receptor-ligand system. Our approach can be used to determine such pharmacological networks for any receptor-ligand complex.

scholarly journals The Role of ICL1 and H8 in Class B1 GPCRs; Implications for Receptor Activlation

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Winfield ◽  
Kerry Barkan ◽  
Sarah Routledge ◽  
Nathan J. Robertson ◽  
Matthew Harris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Dynamics ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Conformational Changes ◽  
Transmembrane Helix ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
Cgrp Receptor ◽  
Intracellular Loop ◽  
Glucagon Receptor ◽  
G Protein Coupled

The first intracellular loop (ICL1) of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) has received little attention, although there is evidence that, with the 8th helix (H8), it is involved in early conformational changes following receptor activation as well as contacting the G protein β subunit. In class B1 GPCRs, the distal part of ICL1 contains a conserved R12.48KLRCxR2.46b motif that extends into the base of the second transmembrane helix; this is weakly conserved as a [R/H]12.48KL[R/H] motif in class A GPCRs. In the current study, the role of ICL1 and H8 in signaling through cAMP, iCa2+ and ERK1/2 has been examined in two class B1 GPCRs, using mutagenesis and molecular dynamics. Mutations throughout ICL1 can either enhance or disrupt cAMP production by CGRP at the CGRP receptor. Alanine mutagenesis identified subtle differences with regard elevation of iCa2+, with the distal end of the loop being particularly sensitive. ERK1/2 activation displayed little sensitivity to ICL1 mutation. A broadly similar pattern was observed with the glucagon receptor, although there were differences in significance of individual residues. Extending the study revealed that at the CRF1 receptor, an insertion in ICL1 switched signaling bias between iCa2+ and cAMP. Molecular dynamics suggested that changes in ICL1 altered the conformation of ICL2 and the H8/TM7 junction (ICL4). For H8, alanine mutagenesis showed the importance of E3908.49b for all three signal transduction pathways, for the CGRP receptor, but mutations of other residues largely just altered ERK1/2 activation. Thus, ICL1 may modulate GPCR bias via interactions with ICL2, ICL4 and the Gβ subunit.

scholarly journals A Microdomain Formed by the Extracellular Ends of the Transmembrane Domains Promotes Activation of the G Protein-Coupled α-Factor Receptor

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 2041-2051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer C. Lin ◽  
Ken Duell ◽  
James B. Konopka
Keyword(s):  
Ligand Binding ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Transmembrane Domain ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptors ◽  
Transmembrane Domains ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Subsequent Step ◽  
G Protein Coupled ◽  
Specific Reagent

ABSTRACT The α-factor receptor (Ste2p) that promotes mating in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is similar to other G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in that it contains seven transmembrane domains. Previous studies suggested that the extracellular ends of the transmembrane domains are important for Ste2p function, so a systematic scanning mutagenesis was carried out in which 46 residues near the ends of transmembrane domains 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7 were replaced with cysteine. These mutants complement mutations constructed previously near the ends of transmembrane domains 5 and 6 to analyze all the extracellular ends. Eight new mutants created in this study were partially defective in signaling (V45C, N46C, T50C, A52C, L102C, N105C, L277C, and A281C). Treatment with 2-([biotinoyl] amino) ethyl methanethiosulfonate, a thiol-specific reagent that reacts with accessible cysteine residues but not membrane-embedded cysteines, identified a drop in the level of reactivity over a consecutive series of residues that was inferred to be the membrane boundary. An unusual prolonged zone of intermediate reactivity near the extracellular end of transmembrane domain 2 suggests that this region may adopt a special structure. Interestingly, residues implicated in ligand binding were mainly accessible, whereas residues involved in the subsequent step of promoting receptor activation were mainly inaccessible. These results define a receptor microdomain that provides an important framework for interpreting the mechanisms by which functionally important residues contribute to ligand binding and activation of Ste2p and other GPCRs.

scholarly journals Conformational changes involved in G-protein-coupled-receptor activation

2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (12) ◽  
pp. 616-625 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürgen Wess ◽  
Sung-Jun Han ◽  
Soo-Kyung Kim ◽  
Kenneth A. Jacobson ◽  
Jian Hua Li
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Conformational Changes ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptor ◽  
G Protein Coupled

scholarly journals CB1 Cannabinoid Receptor Signaling and Biased Signaling

Molecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (17) ◽  
pp. 5413
Author(s):  
Luciana M. Leo ◽  
Mary E. Abood
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Effects ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Conformational Changes ◽  
Cannabinoid Receptor ◽  
Therapeutic Potential ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
Cb1 Receptor ◽  
Cb1 Cannabinoid Receptor ◽  
Biased Signaling ◽  
G Protein Coupled

The CB1 cannabinoid receptor is a G-protein coupled receptor highly expressed throughout the central nervous system that is a promising target for the treatment of various disorders, including anxiety, pain, and neurodegeneration. Despite the wide therapeutic potential of CB1, the development of drug candidates is hindered by adverse effects, rapid tolerance development, and abuse potential. Ligands that produce biased signaling—the preferential activation of a signaling transducer in detriment of another—have been proposed as a strategy to dissociate therapeutic and adverse effects for a variety of G-protein coupled receptors. However, biased signaling at the CB1 receptor is poorly understood due to a lack of strongly biased agonists. Here, we review studies that have investigated the biased signaling profile of classical cannabinoid agonists and allosteric ligands, searching for a potential therapeutic advantage of CB1 biased signaling in different pathological states. Agonist and antagonist bound structures of CB1 and proposed mechanisms of action of biased allosteric modulators are used to discuss a putative molecular mechanism for CB1 receptor activation and biased signaling. Current studies suggest that allosteric binding sites on CB1 can be explored to yield biased ligands that favor or hinder conformational changes important for biased signaling.

scholarly journals The Molecular Basis of G Protein–Coupled Receptor Activation

2018 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 897-919 ◽  
Author(s):  
William I. Weis ◽  
Brian K. Kobilka
Keyword(s):  
Ligand Binding ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Conformational Changes ◽  
Cellular Responses ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptors ◽  
Active Conformation ◽  
Allosteric Coupling ◽  
External Stimuli ◽  
G Protein Coupled

G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediate the majority of cellular responses to external stimuli. Upon activation by a ligand, the receptor binds to a partner heterotrimeric G protein and promotes exchange of GTP for GDP, leading to dissociation of the G protein into α and βγ subunits that mediate downstream signals. GPCRs can also activate distinct signaling pathways through arrestins. Active states of GPCRs form by small rearrangements of the ligand-binding, or orthosteric, site that are amplified into larger conformational changes. Molecular understanding of the allosteric coupling between ligand binding and G protein or arrestin interaction is emerging from structures of several GPCRs crystallized in inactive and active states, spectroscopic data, and computer simulations. The coupling is loose, rather than concerted, and agonist binding does not fully stabilize the receptor in an active conformation. Distinct intermediates whose populations are shifted by ligands of different efficacies underlie the complex pharmacology of GPCRs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document