scholarly journals Repression of divergent noncoding transcription by a sequence-specific transcription factor

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew CK Wu ◽  
Harshil Patel ◽  
Minghao Chia ◽  
Fabien Moretto ◽  
David Frith ◽  
...  

SummaryMany active eukaryotic gene promoters exhibit divergent noncoding transcription, but the mechanisms restricting expression of these transcripts are not well understood. Here we demonstrate how a sequence-specific transcription factor represses divergent noncoding transcription at highly expressed genes in yeast. We find that depletion of the transcription factor Rap1 induces noncoding transcription in a large fraction of Rap1 regulated gene promoters. Specifically, Rap1 prevents transcription initiation at cryptic promoters near its binding sites, which is uncoupled from transcription regulation in the protein-coding direction. We further provide evidence that Rap1 acts independently of chromatin-based mechanisms to repress cryptic or divergent transcription. Finally, we show that divergent transcription in the absence of Rap1 is elicited by the RSC chromatin remodeller. We propose that a sequence-specific transcription factor limits access of basal transcription machinery to regulatory elements and adjacent sequences that act as divergent cryptic promoters, thereby providing directionality towards productive transcription.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Wu ◽  
Claudia Vivori ◽  
Harshil Patel ◽  
Theodora Sideri ◽  
Folkert van Werven

The directionality of gene promoters - the ratio of protein-coding over divergent noncoding transcription - is highly variable and regulated. How promoter directionality is controlled remains poorly understood. We show that the chromatin remodelling complex RSC and general regulatory factors (GRFs) dictate promoter directionality by attenuating divergent transcription. Depletion of RSC increased divergent noncoding transcription and decreased protein-coding transcription at promoters with strong directionality. Consistent with RSCs role in regulating chromatin, RSC depletion impacts nucleosome occupancy upstream of the nucleosome depleted region where divergent transcription initiates, suggesting that nucleosome positioning at the 5 prime border of gene promoters physically blocks the recruitment of the transcription machinery and inhibits initiation of divergent transcription. Highly directional promoters were also enriched for the binding of GRFs such as Reb1 and Abf1. Furthermore, ectopic targeting of divergent transcription initiation sites with GRFs or the dCas9 protein can suppress divergent transcription. Our data suggest that RSC-mediated nucleosome positioning and GRFs play a pervasive role in repressing divergent transcription. We propose that any DNA binding factor, when stably associated with cryptic transcription start sites, can form a barrier for repressing divergent transcription. Our study provides an explanation as to why certain promoters are more directional than others.


2018 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 942-954.e7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew C.K. Wu ◽  
Harshil Patel ◽  
Minghao Chia ◽  
Fabien Moretto ◽  
David Frith ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Rennie ◽  
Maria Dalby ◽  
Marta Lloret-Llinares ◽  
Stylianos Bakoulis ◽  
Christian Dalager Vaagensø ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTMammalian gene promoters and enhancers share many properties. They are composed of a unified promoter architecture of divergent transcripton initiation and gene promoters may exhibit enhancer function. However, it is currently unclear how expression strength of a regulatory element relates to its enhancer strength and if the unifying architecture is conserved across Metazoa. Here we investigate the transcription initiation landscape and its associated RNA decay in D. melanogaster. Surprisingly, we find that the majority of active gene-distal enhancers and a considerable fraction of gene promoters are divergently transcribed. We observe quantitative relationships between enhancer potential, expression level and core promoter strength, providing an explanation for indirectly related histone modifications that are reflecting expression levels. Lowly abundant unstable RNAs initiated from weak core promoters are key characteristics of gene-distal developmental enhancers, while the housekeeping enhancer strengths of gene promoters reflect their expression strengths. The different layers of regulation mediated by gene-distal enhancers and gene promoters are also reflected in chromatin interaction data. Our results suggest a unified promoter architecture of many D. melanogaster regulatory elements, that is universal across Metazoa, whose regulatory functions seem to be related to their core promoter elements.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadezda A. Fursova ◽  
Anne H. Turberfield ◽  
Neil P. Blackledge ◽  
Emma L. Findlater ◽  
Anna Lastuvkova ◽  
...  

AbstractHistone-modifying systems play fundamental roles in gene regulation and the development of multicellular organisms. Histone modifications that are enriched at gene regulatory elements have been heavily studied, but the function of modifications that are found more broadly throughout the genome remains poorly understood. This is exemplified by histone H2A mono-ubiquitylation (H2AK119ub1) which is enriched at Polycomb-repressed gene promoters, but also covers the genome at lower levels. Here, using inducible genetic perturbations and quantitative genomics, we discover that the BAP1 deubiquitylase plays an essential role in constraining H2AK119ub1 throughout the genome. Removal of BAP1 leads to pervasive accumulation of H2AK119ub1, which causes widespread reductions in gene expression. We show that elevated H2AK119ub1 represses gene expression by counteracting transcription initiation from gene regulatory elements, causing reductions in transcription-associated histone modifications. Furthermore, failure to constrain pervasive H2AK119ub1 compromises Polycomb complex occupancy at a subset of Polycomb target genes leading to their derepression, therefore explaining the original genetic characterisation of BAP1 as a Polycomb group gene. Together, these observations reveal that the transcriptional potential of the genome can be modulated by regulating the levels of a pervasive histone modification, without the need for elaborate gene-specific targeting mechanisms.


Science ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 322 (5909) ◽  
pp. 1849-1851 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy C. Seila ◽  
J. Mauro Calabrese ◽  
Stuart S. Levine ◽  
Gene W. Yeo ◽  
Peter B. Rahl ◽  
...  

Transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) is thought to occur unidirectionally from most genes. Here, we present evidence of widespread divergent transcription at protein-encoding gene promoters. Transcription start site–associated RNAs (TSSa-RNAs) nonrandomly flank active promoters, with peaks of antisense and sense short RNAs at 250 nucleotides upstream and 50 nucleotides downstream of TSSs, respectively. Northern analysis shows that TSSa-RNAs are subsets of an RNA population 20 to 90 nucleotides in length. Promoter-associated RNAPII and H3K4-trimethylated histones, transcription initiation hallmarks, colocalize at sense and antisense TSSa-RNA positions; however, H3K79-dimethylated histones, characteristic of elongating RNAPII, are only present downstream of TSSs. These results suggest that divergent transcription over short distances is common for active promoters and may help promoter regions maintain a state poised for subsequent regulation.


1993 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 1196-1204 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Morohashi ◽  
U M Zanger ◽  
S Honda ◽  
M Hara ◽  
M R Waterman ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 295 (26) ◽  
pp. 8725-8735
Author(s):  
Stephanie L. Safgren ◽  
Rachel L. O. Olson ◽  
Anne M. Vrabel ◽  
Luciana L. Almada ◽  
David L. Marks ◽  
...  

The transcription factor GLI1 (GLI family zinc finger 1) plays a key role in the development and progression of multiple malignancies. To date, regulation of transcriptional activity at target gene promoters is the only molecular event known to underlie the oncogenic function of GLI1. Here, we provide evidence that GLI1 controls chromatin accessibility at distal regulatory regions by modulating the recruitment of SMARCA2 (SWI/SNF-related, matrix-associated, actin-dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily A, member 2) to these elements. We demonstrate that SMARCA2 endogenously interacts with GLI1 and enhances its transcriptional activity. Mapping experiments indicated that the C-terminal transcriptional activation domain of GLI1 and SMARCA2's central domains, including its ATPase motif, are required for this interaction. Interestingly, similar to SMARCA2, GLI1 overexpression increased chromatin accessibility, as indicated by results of the micrococcal nuclease assay. Further, results of assays for transposase-accessible chromatin with sequencing (ATAC-seq) after GLI1 knockdown supported these findings, revealing that GLI1 regulates chromatin accessibility at several regions distal to gene promoters. Integrated RNA-seq and ATAC-seq data analyses identified a subset of differentially expressed genes located in cis to these regulated chromatin sites. Finally, using the GLI1-regulated gene HHIP (Hedgehog-interacting protein) as a model, we demonstrate that GLI1 and SMARCA2 co-occupy a distal chromatin peak and that SMARCA2 recruitment to this HHIP putative enhancer requires intact GLI1. These findings provide insights into how GLI1 controls gene expression in cancer cells and may inform approaches targeting this oncogenic transcription factor to manage malignancies.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Conghui Li ◽  
Honghong Wang ◽  
Zhinang Yin ◽  
Pingping Fang ◽  
Ruijing Xiao ◽  
...  

G-quadruplexes (G4s) are noncanonical DNA secondary structures formed through the self-association of guanines, and G4s are distributed widely across the genome. G4 participates in multiple biological processes including gene transcription, and G4-targeted ligands serve as potential therapeutic agents for DNA-targeted therapies. However, genome-wide studies of the exact roles of G4s in transcriptional regulation are still lacking. Here, we establish a sensitive G4-CUT&Tag method for genome-wide profiling of native G4s with high resolution and specificity. We find that native G4 signals are cell type–specific and are associated with transcriptional regulatory elements carrying active epigenetic modifications. Drug-induced promoter-proximal RNA polymerase II pausing promotes nearby G4 formation. In contrast, G4 stabilization by G4-targeted ligands globally reduces RNA polymerase II occupancy at gene promoters as well as nascent RNA synthesis. Moreover, ligand-induced G4 stabilization modulates chromatin states and impedes transcription initiation via inhibition of general transcription factors loading to promoters. Together, our study reveals a reciprocal genome-wide regulation between native G4 dynamics and gene transcription, which will deepen our understanding of G4 biology toward therapeutically targeting G4s in human diseases.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud M. Ibrahim ◽  
Aslihan Karabacak ◽  
Alexander Glahs ◽  
Ena Kolundzic ◽  
Antje Hirsekorn ◽  
...  

AbstractDivergent transcription from promoters and enhancers is pervasive in many species, but it remains unclear if it is a general and passive feature of all eukaryotic cis regulatory elements. To address this, we define promoters and enhancers in C. elegans, D. melanogaster and H. sapiens using ATAC-Seq and investigate the determinants of their transcription initiation directionalities by analyzing genome-wide nascent, cap-selected, polymerase run-on assays. All three species initiate divergent transcription from separate core promoter sequences. Sequence asymmetry downstream of forward and reverse initiation sites, known to be important for termination and stability in H. sapiens, is unique in each species. Chromatin states of divergent promoters are not entirely conserved, but in all three species, the levels of histone modifications on the +1 nucleosome are independent from those on the -1 nucleosome, arguing for independent initiation events. This is supported by an integrative model of H3K4me3 levels and core promoter sequence that is highly predictive of promoter directionality and of two types of promoters: those with balanced initiation directionality and those with skewed directionality. Lastly, D. melanogaster enhancers display variation in chromatin architecture depending on enhancer location, and D. melanogaster promoter regions with dual enhancer/promoter potential are enriched for divergent transcription. Our results point to a high degree of variation in regulatory element transcription initiation directionality within and between metazoans, and to non-passive regulatory mechanisms of transcription initiation directionality in those species.


Blood ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 990-999 ◽  
Author(s):  
MJ Ulrich ◽  
TJ Ley

Abstract We examined the importance of cis-acting regulatory elements of the human gamma-globin gene promoter in a cell line (K562) where this gene normally functions. A gamma-Globin promoter fragments were fused to the neomycin phosphotransferase (neoR) gene in a plasmid-based vector and transiently transfected by electroporation into K562 cells. Correctly initiated “A gamma-neo” transcripts were detected with an S1 nuclease protection assay that was internally controlled for transfection efficiency and RNA content. We first optimized the conditions for electroporation, and then determined input DNA concentrations that permitted study of gamma-promoter function in the linear range of the assay. We discovered that a gamma-globin promoter fragment extending from -299 to +36 (with respect to the transcription initiation site) was active in this transient transfection assay, and that the expression of this promoter was increased by the SV40 enhancer. Deletion of the gamma-globin promoter to position -199 did not significantly affect gamma-globin promoter function. However, deletion to -160 reduced gamma promoter strength to 70% that of control, deletion to position -130 to 19% that of control, and deletion to position -61 to 8.7% that of control. Three gamma-globin promoters containing mutations associated with hereditary persistence of fetal hemoglobin (-202 C----G, -196 C----T, and -117 G----A) were not overexpressed in the K562 cell environment, consistent with the hypothesis that these promoters are not overexpressed in fetal erythroblasts, only adult erythroid cells. This system will allow us to further dissect the roles of regulatory globin cis-acting DNA elements in fetal erythroid cells.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document