scholarly journals Regulatory mechanisms for the axonal localization of tau in neurons

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minori Iwata ◽  
Shoji Watanabe ◽  
Ayaka Yamane ◽  
Tomohiro Miyasaka ◽  
Hiroaki Misonou
Keyword(s):  
Hippocampal Neurons ◽  
Neuronal Development ◽  
Experimental System ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Rich Region ◽  
Phosphorylation State ◽  
Microtubule Binding Domain ◽  
Mature Neuron ◽  
Early Expression ◽  
Proline Rich Region

AbstractTau is a microtubule (MT)-associated protein, which precisely localizes to the axon of a mature neuron. Although it has been widely used as an axonal marker, the mechanisms for its axonal localization have been elusive. This might be largely due to the lack of an experimental system, as exogenously expressed tau, such as GFP-tau, mis-localizes to the soma and dendrites. In this study, we found that the expression of endogenous tau and its axonal localization in cultured rat hippocampal neurons mainly occur during early neuronal development and are coupled. By mimicking this early expression, we demonstrate that exogenously expressed human tau can be properly localized to the axon, thereby providing the first experimental model to study the mechanisms of tau localization. Using this model, we obtained surprising findings that the axonal localization of tau did not require the MT-binding domain nor correlate with the MT-binding ability. Instead, we identified a transport mechanism mediated by the proline-rich region 2 (PRR2), which contains a number of important phosphorylation sites. Mimicking phosphorylation and dephosphorylation in PRR2 disrupts the axonal localization, suggesting that it is regulated by the phosphorylation state of PRR2. These results shed new lights on the mechanism for the axonal localization of tau and indicate a link between the hyperphosphorylation and mis-localization of tau observed in tauopathies.Significance statementIn this paper, we present a first experimental system, in which expressed tau is properly localized to the axon, and which can therefore be used to study the mechanisms of tau localization and mis-localization. Using this system, we provide evidence that the microtubule binding domain of tau nor stable binding of tau to microtubules is not necessary for its axonal localization. Instead, we identified the proline-rich region and its phosphorylation-state dictate the localization of tau in neurons. These results provide a novel foundation to consider how axonal tau mis-localize to the soma and dendrites during early pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease.

scholarly journals Regulatory mechanisms for the axonal localization of tau protein in neurons

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (19) ◽  
pp. 2441-2457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minori Iwata ◽  
Shoji Watanabe ◽  
Ayaka Yamane ◽  
Tomohiro Miyasaka ◽  
Hiroaki Misonou
Keyword(s):  
Tau Protein ◽  
Hippocampal Neurons ◽  
Neuronal Development ◽  
Tight Binding ◽  
Regulatory Mechanisms ◽  
Rich Region ◽  
Mature Neurons ◽  
Developing Neurons ◽  
Surprising Finding ◽  
Proline Rich Region

Tau is a microtubule (MT)-associated protein that is thought to be localized to the axon. However, its precise localization in developing neurons and mechanisms for the axonal localization have not been fully addressed. In this study, we found that the axonal localization of tau in cultured rat hippocampal neurons mainly occur during early neuronal development. Interestingly, transient expression of human tau in very immature neurons, but not in mature neurons, mimicked the developmental localization of endogenous tau to the axon. We therefore were able to establish an experimental model, in which exogenously expressed tau can be properly localized to the axon. Using this model, we obtained a surprising finding that the axonal localization of tau did not require stable MT binding. Tau lacking the MT-binding domain (MTBD) exhibited high diffusivity but localized properly to the axon. In contrast, a dephosphorylation-mimetic mutant of the proline-rich region 2 showed reinforced MT binding and mislocalization. Our results suggest that tight binding to MTs prevents tau from entering the axon and results in mislocalization in the soma and dendrites when expressed in mature neurons. This study therefore provides a novel mechanism independent of MTBD for the axonal localization of tau.

scholarly journals Second-Site Changes Affect Viability of Amphotropic/Ecotropic Chimeric Enveloped Murine Leukemia Viruses

2000 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 899-913 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucille O'Reilly ◽  
Monica J. Roth
Keyword(s):  
Receptor Binding ◽  
Single Point ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Receptor Binding Domain ◽  
Rich Region ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Nih 3T3 ◽  
Proline Rich Region ◽  
Murine Leukemia

ABSTRACT Chimeras were previously generated between the ecotropic (Moloney-MuLV) and amphotropic (4070A) SU and TM proteins of murine leukemia virus (MuLV). After passage in D17 cells, three chimeras with junctions in the C terminus of SU (AE5, AE6, and AE7), showed improved kinetics of viral spreading, suggesting that they had adapted. Sequencing of the viruses derived from the D17 cell lines revealed second-site changes within the env gene. Changes were detected in the receptor binding domain, the proline-rich region, the C terminus of SU, and the ectodomain of TM. Second-site changes were subcloned into the parental DNA, singly and in combination, and tested for viability. All viruses had maintained their original cloned mutations and junctions. Reconstruction and passage of AE7 or AE6 virus with single point mutations recovered the additional second-site changes identified in the parental population. The AE5 isolate required changes in the VRA, the VRC, the VRB-hinge region, and the C terminus of SU for efficient infection. Passage of virus, including the parental 4070A, in D17 cells resulted in a predominant G100R mutation within the receptor binding domain. Viruses were subjected to titer determination in three cell types, NIH 3T3, canine D17, and 293T. AE6 viruses with changes in the proline-rich region initially adapted for growth on D17 cells could infect all cell types tested. AE6-based chimeras with additional mutations in the C terminus of SU could infect D17 and 293T cells. Infection of NIH 3T3 cells was dependent on the proline-rich mutation. AE7-based chimeras encoding L538Q and G100R were impaired in infecting NIH 3T3 and 293T cells.

scholarly journals Regulation of tau’s proline rich region by its N-terminal domain

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen McKibben ◽  
Elizabeth Rhoades
Keyword(s):  
Binding Domain ◽  
Rich Region ◽  
Tau Function ◽  
Microtubule Binding ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
Microtubule Polymerization ◽  
Tubulin Binding ◽  
Proline Rich Region

AbstractTau is an intrinsically disordered, microtubule-associated protein with a role in regulating microtubule dynamics. Despite intensive research, the molecular mechanisms of taumediated microtubule polymerization are poorly understood. Here we use single molecule fluorescence to investigate the role of tau’s N-terminal domain (NTD) and proline rich region (PRR) in regulating interactions of tau with soluble tubulin. Both full-length tau isoforms and truncated variants are assayed for their ability to bind soluble tubulin and stimulate microtubule polymerization. We describe a novel role for tau’s PRR as an independent tubulin-binding domain with polymerization capacity. In contrast to the relatively weak tubulin interactions distributed throughout the microtubule binding repeats (MTBR), resulting in heterogeneous tau:tubulin complexes, the PRR binds tubulin tightly and stoichiometrically. Moreover, we demonstrate that interactions between the PRR and MTBR are reduced by the NTD through a conserved conformational ensemble. Based on our data, we propose that tau’s PRR can serve as a core tubulin-binding domain, while the MTBR enhances polymerization capacity by increasing the local tubulin concentration. The NTD negatively regulates tubulin-binding interactions of both of these domains. This study draws attention to the central role of the PRR in tau function, as well as providing mechanistic insight into tau-mediated polymerization of tubulin.Significance StatementTau is an intrinsically disordered, microtubule associated protein linked to a number of neurodegenerative disorders. Here we identify tau’s proline rich region as having autonomous tubulin binding and polymerization capacity, which is enhanced by the flanking microtubule binding repeats. Moreover, we demonstrate that tau’s N-terminal domain negatively regulates both binding and polymerization. We propose a novel model for tau-mediated polymerization whereby the proline rich region serves as a core tubulin-binding domain, while the microtubule binding repeats increase the local concentration. Our work draws attention to the importance of the proline rich region and N-terminal domain in tau function, and highlights the proline rich region as a putative target for the development of therapeutics.

Spastin Interacts with CRMP2 to Regulate Neurite Outgrowth by Controlling Microtubule Dynamics through Phosphorylation Modifications

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumei Li ◽  
Jifeng Zhang ◽  
Jiaqi Zhang ◽  
Jiong Li ◽  
Longfei Cheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neurite Outgrowth ◽  
Hippocampal Neurons ◽  
Neuronal Development ◽  
Phosphorylation Site ◽  
Microtubule Dynamics ◽  
Microtubule Assembly ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Mediator Protein ◽  
Branch Formation

Aims: Our work aims to revealing the underlying microtubule mechanism of neurites outgrowth during neuronal development, and also proposes a feasible intervention pathway for reconstructing neural network connections after nerve injury. Background: Microtubule polymerization and severing are the basis for the neurite outgrowth and branch formation. Collapsin response mediator protein 2 (CRMP2) regulates axonal growth and branching as a binding partner of the tubulin heterodimer to promote microtubule assembly. And spastin participates in the growth and regeneration of neurites by severing microtubules into small segments. However, how CRMP2 and spastin cooperate to regulate neurite outgrowth by controlling the microtubule dynamics needs to be elucidated. Objective: To explore whether neurite outgrowth was mediated by coordination of CRMP2 and spastin. Method: Hippocampal neurons were cultured in vitro in 24-well culture plates for 4 days before being used to perform the transfection. Calcium phosphate was used to transfect the CRMP2 and spastin constructs and their control into the neurons. An interaction between CRMP2 and spastin was examined by using pull down, CoIP and immunofluorescence colocalization assays. And immunostaining was also performed to determine the morphology of neurites. Result: We first demonstrated that CRMP2 interacted with spastin to promote the neurite outgrowth and branch formation. Furthermore, our results identified that phosphorylation modification failed to alter the binding affinities of CRMP2 for spastin, but inhibited their binding to microtubules. CRMP2 interacted with the MTBD domain of spastin via its C-terminus, and blocking the binding sites of them inhibited the outgrowth and branch formation of neurites. In addition, we confirmed one phosphorylation site S210 at spastin in hippocampal neurons and phosphorylation spastin at site S210 promoted the neurite outgrowth but not branch formation by remodeling microtubules. Conclusion: Taken together, our data demonstrated that the interaction of CRMP2 and spastin is required for neurite outgrowth and branch formation and their interaction is not regulated by their phosphorylation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document