scholarly journals Integrin α6β4 signaling switches DNA repair from homologous recombination to non-homologous end-joining pathway to sensitize breast cancer cells to cisplatin

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Chen ◽  
Brock Marrs ◽  
Lei Qi ◽  
Teresa Knifley ◽  
Stuart G. Jarrett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Genetic Manipulation ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Apoptosis Resistance ◽  
Integrin Α6β4 ◽  
Cisplatin Sensitivity ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

AbstractIntegrin α6β4 is highly expressed in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and drives aggressiveness by stimulating proliferation, angiogenesis, cell migration, invasion and metastasis. Signaling from this integrin stimulates DNA repair and apoptosis resistance, suggesting that it could contribute to therapeutic resistance. Upon testing this hypothesis, we found that integrin α6β4 signaling promoted a three-fold greater sensitivity to cisplatin but exhibited no difference in response to other chemotherapies tested. Mechanistic investigations revealed that integrin α6β4 stimulated quicker and higher amplitude of activation of ATM, Chk2, p53, and 53BP1, which required the integrin β4 signaling domain. Genetic manipulation of gene expression demonstrated that mutant p53 cooperated with integrin α6β4 for cisplatin sensitivity and was necessary for downstream phosphorylation of 53BP1 and enhanced ATM activation. Additionally, we discovered that integrin α6β4 preferentially activated DNA-PKc in response to cisplatin, which led to formation of DNA-PKc-p53 complexes and 53BP1 activation. As a result, integrin α6β4 shifted double strand break repair from homologous recombination (HR) to non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). In summary, we discovered a novel function of integrin α6β4 in switching DSB repair from HR to NHEJ that results in cisplatin sensitivity in TNBC.

scholarly journals Genome Instability and Pressure on Non-Homologous end Joining drives Chemotherapy Resistance via a DNA Repair Crisis Switch in Triple Negative Breast Cancer.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Wiegmans ◽  
Ambber Ward ◽  
Ekaterina Ivanova ◽  
Pascal H G Duijf ◽  
Romy VanOosterhout ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Chemotherapy Resistance ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Repair Pathways ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

Abstract Background: Chemotherapy intensifies pressure on the DNA repair pathways that can lead to deregulation. There is an urgent clinical need to be able to track the emergence of chemotherapy resistance and tailor patient staging appropriately. This is especially evident in the triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype, of which standard of care is chemotherapy with tumours displaying high levels of inherent genome instability. TNBC has an overall poor prognosis for survival. There have been numerous studies into single agent chemoresistance but to date no study has elucidated in detail the roles of the key DNA repair components in resistance associated with the frontline clinical combination of anthracyclines and taxanes together. Methods: In this study, we hypothesized that the emergence of chemotherapy resistance is driven by changes in functional signaling in the DNA repair pathways. We identified the importance of the DNA repair pathways in chemoresistant clinical samples and characterized the emergence of chemoresistance in TNBC cell lines. We utilized classical DNA repair assays and specific targeting of key DNA repair proteins to elucidate a new mechanism for adaptation to the combination of doxorubicin and docetaxel. Results: We identified that consistent pressure on the non-homologous end joining pathway in the presence of genome instability causes failure of the key kinase DNA-PK, loss of p53 and compensation by p73. In-turn a switch to reliance on the homologous recombination pathway and RAD51 recombinase occurs to repair residual double strand DNA breaks. Conclusions: We demonstrate that RAD51 is an actionable target for resensitization to chemotherapy in resistant cells with a matched gene expression profile of resistance highlighted by homologous recombination.

scholarly journals Genome instability and pressure on non-homologous end joining drives chemotherapy resistance via a DNA repair crisis switch in triple negative breast cancer

NAR Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian P Wiegmans ◽  
Ambber Ward ◽  
Ekaterina Ivanova ◽  
Pascal H G Duijf ◽  
Mark N Adams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Chemotherapy Resistance ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Repair Pathways ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

Abstract Chemotherapy is used as a standard-of-care against cancers that display high levels of inherent genome instability. Chemotherapy induces DNA damage and intensifies pressure on the DNA repair pathways that can lead to deregulation. There is an urgent clinical need to be able to track the emergence of DNA repair driven chemotherapy resistance and tailor patient staging appropriately. There have been numerous studies into chemoresistance but to date no study has elucidated in detail the roles of the key DNA repair components in resistance associated with the frontline clinical combination of anthracyclines and taxanes together. In this study, we hypothesized that the emergence of chemotherapy resistance in triple negative breast cancer was driven by changes in functional signaling in the DNA repair pathways. We identified that consistent pressure on the non-homologous end joining pathway in the presence of genome instability causes failure of the key kinase DNA-PK, loss of p53 and compensation by p73. In-turn a switch to reliance on the homologous recombination pathway and RAD51 recombinase occurred to repair residual double strand DNA breaks. Further we demonstrate that RAD51 is an actionable target for resensitization to chemotherapy in resistant cells with a matched gene expression profile of resistance highlighted by homologous recombination in clinical samples.

141 INDICATIONS FOR DNA DOUBLE-STRAND BREAK REPAIR IN EARLY BOVINE EMBRYOS

2007 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 188
Author(s):  
A. Brero ◽  
D. Koehler ◽  
T. Cremer ◽  
E. Wolf ◽  
V. Zakhartchenko
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Homologous Recombination Repair ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Male And Female ◽  
Γh2ax Foci ◽  
Recombination Repair

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are considered the most severe type of DNA lesions, because such lesions, if unrepaired, lead to a loss of genome integrity. Soon after induction of DSBs, chromatin surrounding the damage is modified by phosphorylation of the histone variant H2AX, generating so-called γH2AX, which is a hallmark of DSBs (Takahashi et al. 2005 Cancer Lett. 229, 171–179). γH2AX appears to be a signal for the recruitment of proteins constituting the DNA repair machinery. Depending on the type of damage and the cell cycle stage of the affected cell, DSBs are repaired either by nonhomologous end joining or by homologous recombination using the sister chromatid DNA as template (Hoeijmakers 2001 Nature 411, 366–374). We used immunofluorescence to analyze chromatin composition during bovine development and found γH2AX foci in both male and female pronuclei of IVF embryos. The number and size of foci varied considerably between embryos and between the male and female pronuclei. To test whether the observed γH2AX foci represented sites of active DNA repair, we co-stained IVF zygotes for γH2AX and 3 different proteins involved in homologous recombination repair of DSBs: NBS1 (phosphorylated at amino acid serine 343), 53BP1, and Rad51. We found co-localization of γH2AX foci with phosphorylated NBS1 as well as with Rad51 but did not observe the presence of 53BP1 at γH2AX foci in IVF zygotes. Our finding shows the presence of DSBs in IVF zygotes and suggests the capability of homologous recombination repair. The lack of 53BP1, a component of homologous recombination repair, which usually co-localizes with γH2AX foci at exogenously induced DSBs (Schultz et al. 2000 J. Cell. Biol. 151, 1381–1390) poses the possibility that the mechanism present in early embryos differs substantially from that involved in DNA repair of DSBs in somatic cells.

scholarly journals RecF and RecR Play Critical Roles in the Homologous Recombination and Single-Strand Annealing Pathways of Mycobacteria

2015 ◽  
Vol 197 (19) ◽  
pp. 3121-3132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richa Gupta ◽  
Stewart Shuman ◽  
Michael S. Glickman
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Single Strand ◽  
Central Position ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Strand Annealing

ABSTRACTMycobacteria encode three DNA double-strand break repair pathways: (i) RecA-dependent homologous recombination (HR), (ii) Ku-dependent nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), and (iii) RecBCD-dependent single-strand annealing (SSA). Mycobacterial HR has two presynaptic pathway options that rely on the helicase-nuclease AdnAB and the strand annealing protein RecO, respectively. Ablation ofadnABorrecOindividually causes partial impairment of HR, but loss ofadnABandrecOin combination abolishes HR. RecO, which can accelerate annealing of single-stranded DNAin vitro, also participates in the SSA pathway. The functions of RecF and RecR, which, in other model bacteria, function in concert with RecO as mediators of RecA loading, have not been examined in mycobacteria. Here, we present a genetic analysis ofrecFandrecRin mycobacterial recombination. We find that RecF, like RecO, participates in the AdnAB-independent arm of the HR pathway and in SSA. In contrast, RecR is required for all HR in mycobacteria and for SSA. The essentiality of RecR as an agent of HR is yet another distinctive feature of mycobacterial DNA repair.IMPORTANCEThis study clarifies the molecular requirements for homologous recombination in mycobacteria. Specifically, we demonstrate that RecF and RecR play important roles in both the RecA-dependent homologous recombination and RecA-independent single-strand annealing pathways. Coupled with our previous findings (R. Gupta, M. Ryzhikov, O. Koroleva, M. Unciuleac, S. Shuman, S. Korolev, and M. S. Glickman, Nucleic Acids Res 41:2284–2295, 2013,http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1298), these results revise our view of mycobacterial recombination and place the RecFOR system in a central position in homology-dependent DNA repair.

scholarly journals Homology-directed repair of a defective glabrous gene in Arabidopsis with Cas9-based gene targeting

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Hahn ◽  
Marion Eisenhut ◽  
Otho Mantegazza ◽  
Andreas P.M. Weber
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Gene Targeting ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break ◽  
In Planta ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Trichome Formation ◽  
Break Site ◽  
Repair Template ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

ABSTRACTThe CRISPR/Cas9 system has emerged as a powerful tool for targeted genome editing in plants and beyond. Double-strand breaks induced by the Cas9 enzyme are repaired by the cell’s own repair machinery either by the non-homologous end joining pathway or by homologous recombination. While the first repair mechanism results in random mutations at the double-strand break site, homologous recombination uses the genetic information from a highly homologous repair template as blueprint for repair of the break. By offering an artificial repair template, this pathway can be exploited to introduce specific changes at a site of choice in the genome. However, frequencies of double-strand break repair by homologous recombination are very low. In this study, we compared two methods that have been reported to enhance frequencies of homologous recombination in plants. The first method boosts the repair template availability through the formation of viral replicons, the second method makes use of an in planta gene targeting approach. Additionally, we comparatively applied a nickase instead of a nuclease for target strand priming. To allow easy, visual detection of homologous recombination events, we aimed at restoring trichome formation in a glabrous Arabidopsis mutant by repairing a defective glabrous1 gene. Using this efficient visual marker, we were able to regenerate plants repaired by homologous recombination at frequencies of 0.12% using the in planta gene targeting approach, while both approaches using viral replicons did not yield any trichome-bearing plants.

scholarly journals The deSUMOylase SENP2 coordinates homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining by independent mechanisms

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander J. Garvin ◽  
Alexandra K. Walker ◽  
Ruth M. Densham ◽  
Anoop Singh Chauhan ◽  
Helen R. Stone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

AbstractSUMOylation in the DNA double-strand break (DSB) response regulates recruitment, activity and clearance of repair factors. However, our understanding of a role for deSUMOylation in this process is limited. Here we identify different mechanistic roles for deSUMOylation in homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous enjoining (NHEJ) through the investigation of the deSUMOylase SENP2. We find regulated deSUMOylation of MDC1 prevents excessive SUMOylation and its RNF4-VCP mediated clearance from DSBs, thereby promoting NHEJ. In contrast we show HR is differentially sensitive to SUMO availability and SENP2 activity is needed to provide SUMO. SENP2 is amplified as part of the chromosome 3q amplification in many cancers. Increased SENP2 expression prolongs MDC1 foci retention and increases NHEJ and radioresistance. Collectively our data reveal that deSUMOylation differentially primes cells for responding to DSBs and demonstrates the ability of SENP2 to tune DSB repair responses.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document