scholarly journals Nucleus Assembly and Import in Xenopus laevis Egg Extract

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (6) ◽  
pp. pdb.prot097196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pan Chen ◽  
Daniel L. Levy
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (9) ◽  
pp. pdb.prot102509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julio C. Flores Servin ◽  
Aaron F. Straight

1990 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 177-184
Author(s):  
L.S. Cox ◽  
G.H. Leno

We describe a cell-free extract derived from the oocytes of Xenopus laevis. The oocyte extract is capable of decondensing sperm chromatin and of replicating single-stranded DNA in a semiconservative, aphidicolin-sensitive manner. In addition, oocyte extract supports the elongation phase of DNA synthesis in nuclei that have been preinitiated for replication. All of these properties are shared by previously described egg extracts. However, oocyte extracts differ from egg extracts in two important ways. First, they cannot support nuclear assembly, as visualised by phase-contrast, fluorescence and electron microscopy. Second, they do not initiate replication on chromatin or nuclei de novo. Crude low-speed supernatants can be partially fractionated into soluble and vesicular components by high-speed centrifugation. Such fractions from eggs can be functionally reconstituted, but the oocyte soluble fraction does not acquire the ability to assemble nuclei, or replicate them, even when supplemented with the egg vesicular fraction. Similarly, oocyte vesicles cannot substitute for egg vesicles on reconstitution with the egg soluble fraction. When the requirement for nuclear assembly is bypassed by using preformed, quiescent nuclei, replication is observed in egg but not oocyte extracts. However, the oocyte extract is not inhibitory for initiation of replication, as it does not prevent replication of sperm nuclei when mixed with egg extract. We suggest that the different capabilities of egg and oocyte extracts could provide the basis of an assay system for identifying factors involved in the initiation of DNA replication.


2008 ◽  
Vol 182 (4) ◽  
pp. 715-726 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne Uteng ◽  
Christian Hentrich ◽  
Kota Miura ◽  
Peter Bieling ◽  
Thomas Surrey

Molecular motors are required for spindle assembly and maintenance during cell division. How motors move and interact inside spindles is unknown. Using photoactivation and photobleaching, we measure mitotic motor movement inside a dynamic spindle. We find that dynein–dynactin transports the essential motor Eg5 toward the spindle poles in Xenopus laevis egg extract spindles, revealing a direct interplay between two motors of opposite directionality. This transport occurs throughout the spindle except at the very spindle center and at the spindle poles, where Eg5 remains stationary. The variation of Eg5 dynamics with its position in the spindle is indicative of position-dependent functions of this motor protein. Our results suggest that Eg5 drives microtubule flux by antiparallel microtubule sliding in the spindle center, whereas the dynein-dependent concentration of Eg5 outside the spindle center could contribute to parallel microtubule cross-linking. These results emphasize the importance of spatially differentiated functions of motor proteins and contribute to our understanding of spindle organization.


2010 ◽  
Vol 98 (3) ◽  
pp. 474a
Author(s):  
Hongxia Fu ◽  
Benjamin Freedman ◽  
Chwee Teck Lim ◽  
Rebecca Heald ◽  
Jie Yan

Gene ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 124 (2) ◽  
pp. 275-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heiner Schaal ◽  
Petra Pfeiffer ◽  
Michael Klein ◽  
Peter Gehrmann ◽  
Andreas Scheid

2004 ◽  
Vol 167 (5) ◽  
pp. 813-818 ◽  
Author(s):  
David T. Miyamoto ◽  
Zachary E. Perlman ◽  
Kendra S. Burbank ◽  
Aaron C. Groen ◽  
Timothy J. Mitchison

Although mitotic and meiotic spindles maintain a steady-state length during metaphase, their antiparallel microtubules slide toward spindle poles at a constant rate. This “poleward flux” of microtubules occurs in many organisms and may provide part of the force for chromosome segregation. We use quantitative image analysis to examine the role of the kinesin Eg5 in poleward flux in metaphase Xenopus laevis egg extract spindles. Pharmacological inhibition of Eg5 results in a dose–responsive slowing of flux, and biochemical depletion of Eg5 significantly decreases the flux rate. Our results suggest that ensembles of nonprocessive Eg5 motors drive flux in metaphase Xenopus extract spindles.


Chromosoma ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 120 (3) ◽  
pp. 245-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongxia Fu ◽  
Benjamin S. Freedman ◽  
Chwee Teck Lim ◽  
Rebecca Heald ◽  
Jie Yan

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. e201900390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Priego Moreno ◽  
Rebecca M Jones ◽  
Divyasree Poovathumkadavil ◽  
Shaun Scaramuzza ◽  
Agnieszka Gambus

We have shown previously that the process of replication machinery (replisome) disassembly at the termination of DNA replication forks in the S-phase is driven through polyubiquitylation of one of the replicative helicase subunits (Mcm7) by Cul2LRR1 ubiquitin ligase. Interestingly, upon inhibition of this pathway in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos, the replisomes retained on chromatin were unloaded in the subsequent mitosis. Here, we show that this mitotic replisome disassembly pathway exists in Xenopus laevis egg extract and we determine the first elements of its regulation. The mitotic disassembly pathway depends on the formation of K6- and K63-linked ubiquitin chains on Mcm7 by TRAIP ubiquitin ligase and the activity of p97/VCP protein segregase. Unlike in lower eukaryotes, however, it does not require SUMO modifications. Importantly, we also show that this process can remove all replisomes from mitotic chromatin, including stalled ones, which indicates a wide application for this pathway over being just a “backup” for terminated replisomes. Finally, we characterise the composition of the replisome retained on chromatin until mitosis.


1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 5054-5062 ◽  
Author(s):  
J M Lemaitre ◽  
S Bocquet ◽  
R Buckle ◽  
M Mechali

We report here unusual features of c-Myc specific to early embryonic development in Xenopus laevis, a period characterized by generalized transcriptional quiescence and rapid biphasic cell cycles. Two c-Myc protein forms, p61 and p64, are present in large amounts in the oocyte as well as during early development. In contrast, only p64 c-Myc is present in Xenopus somatic cells. p61 c-Myc is the direct translation product from both endogenous c-myc mRNAs and c-myc recombinant DNA. It is converted to the p64 c-Myc form after introduction into an egg extract, in the presence of phosphatase inhibitors. p61 and p64 belong to two distinct complexes localized in the cytoplasm of the oocyte. A 15S complex contains p64 c-Myc, and a 17.4S complex contains p61 c-Myc. Fertilization triggers the selective and total entry of only p64 c-Myc into the nucleus. This translocation occurs in a nonprogressive manner and is completed during the first cell cycles. This phenomenon results in an exceptionally high level of c-Myc in the nucleus, which returns to a somatic cell-like level only at the end of the blastulation period. During early development, when the entire embryonic genome is transcriptionally inactive, c-Myc does not exhibit a DNA binding activity with Max. Moreover, embryonic nuclei not only prevent the formation of c-Myc/Max complexes but also dissociate such preformed complexes. These peculiar aspects of c-Myc behavior suggest a function that could be linked to the rapid DNA replication cycles occurring during the early cell cycles rather than a function involving transcriptional activity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document