A refraction correction for buried interfaces applied to in situ grazing-incidence X-ray diffraction studies on Pd electrodes

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan T. Landers ◽  
David M. Koshy ◽  
Soo Hong Lee ◽  
Walter S. Drisdell ◽  
Ryan C. Davis ◽  
...  

In situ characterization of electrochemical systems can provide deep insights into the structure of electrodes under applied potential. Grazing-incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXRD) is a particularly valuable tool owing to its ability to characterize the near-surface structure of electrodes through a layer of electrolyte, which is of paramount importance in surface-mediated processes such as catalysis and adsorption. Corrections for the refraction that occurs as an X-ray passes through an interface have been derived for a vacuum–material interface. In this work, a more general form of the refraction correction was developed which can be applied to buried interfaces, including liquid–solid interfaces. The correction is largest at incidence angles near the critical angle for the interface and decreases at angles larger and smaller than the critical angle. Effective optical constants are also introduced which can be used to calculate the critical angle for total external reflection at the interface. This correction is applied to GIXRD measurements of an aqueous electrolyte–Pd interface, demonstrating that the correction allows for the comparison of GIXRD measurements at multiple incidence angles. This work improves quantitative analysis of d-spacing values from GIXRD measurements of liquid–solid systems, facilitating the connection between electrochemical behavior and structure under in situ conditions.

2000 ◽  
Vol 07 (04) ◽  
pp. 437-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. RENAUD

The application of X-rays to the structural characterization of surfaces and interfaces, in situ and in UHV, is discussed on selected examples. Grazing incidence X-ray diffraction is not only a very powerful technique for quantitatively investigating the atomic structure of surfaces and interfaces, but is also very useful for providing information on the interfacial registry for coherent interfaces or on the strain deformation, island and grain sizes for incoherent epilayers.


2011 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 1546-1553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Pierre Veder ◽  
Ayman Nafady ◽  
Graeme Clarke ◽  
Ross P. Williams ◽  
Roland De Marco ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 2830-2839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yvonne Soldo-Olivier ◽  
Maurizio De Santis ◽  
Wang Liang ◽  
Eric Sibert

Surface X-ray diffraction characterization of a Pd10ML/Au(111) film. A characteristic Pd rod with sharp Bragg-like peaks is observed, signature of 3D islands growth.


1990 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Pinchaux ◽  
M. Sauvage-Simkin ◽  
J. Massies ◽  
N. Jedrecy ◽  
N. Greiser ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 239 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. M. Clemens ◽  
J-A. Bain ◽  
A. P. Payne ◽  
T. C. Hufnagel ◽  
S. M. Brennan

ABSTRACTStructural deviations from ideal layering of bulk constituents can have dramatic effects on the properties of multilayered materials. We discuss three examples of the use of x-ray diffraction in non-standard geometries to examine these effects. In Mo/Ni multilayers, we use asymmetric diffraction and grazing incidence x-ray scattering (GIXS) to deduce the strain and intermixing. We find that coherency stresses between the BCC Mo and FCC Ni planes play a major role. In the Fe/Cr system, we use rocking curves and asymmetric scans about the small angle superlattice lines to investigate the nature and extent of layer roughness. We find that conformai roughness dominates our best samples, while non-conformal roughness increases with sputter deposition pressure. In the Gd/Co system, we use in-situ GIXS to investigate amorphization reaction during deposition. We find a strong diffusional asymmetry and rapid reaction during growth.


Author(s):  
R. E. Herfert

Studies of the nature of a surface, either metallic or nonmetallic, in the past, have been limited to the instrumentation available for these measurements. In the past, optical microscopy, replica transmission electron microscopy, electron or X-ray diffraction and optical or X-ray spectroscopy have provided the means of surface characterization. Actually, some of these techniques are not purely surface; the depth of penetration may be a few thousands of an inch. Within the last five years, instrumentation has been made available which now makes it practical for use to study the outer few 100A of layers and characterize it completely from a chemical, physical, and crystallographic standpoint. The scanning electron microscope (SEM) provides a means of viewing the surface of a material in situ to magnifications as high as 250,000X.


1989 ◽  
Vol 211-212 ◽  
pp. 39-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Sauvage-Simkin ◽  
R. Pinchaux ◽  
J. Massies ◽  
P. Claverie ◽  
J. Bonnet ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document