Income vs price subsidy: policy options to help the urban poor facing food price surge

2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huang Chunyan ◽  
Zhong Funing ◽  
He Jun
2018 ◽  
Vol III (III) ◽  
pp. 54-73
Author(s):  
Sajjad ◽  
Zahoor Ul Haq ◽  
Zia Ullah

We estimate the effect of food price subsidy on poverty in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan in this paper. The study uses Linear Approximate Almost Ideal Demand System for the estimation of compensated and uncompensated price and expenditure elasticities of food using Household Integrated Economic Survey. The estimated own and cross price Hicksian elasticities are used for estimating the changes in the quantity of food consumed, expenditure on food and its effect on poverty. The study uses two recent available poverty lines for estimation, showing that the scheme of food price subsidy increase real income of the households which has a decreased poverty state. The analysis shows that the subsidy program marginally decreases poverty in the province. The study recommends targeted food price subsidy for poverty alleviation and eradicating chronic hunger.


2010 ◽  
Vol 55 (02) ◽  
pp. 401-410
Author(s):  
TITAS KUMAR BANDOPADHYAY

The purpose of this paper is to examine Field's (1989) proposition in a multisector general equilibrium model with imperfect capital mobility. The effects of different fiscal policies on the equilibrium rate of urban unemployment are also examined. The main findings are (i) more efficient on-the-job search from the rural sector raises equilibrium urban unemployment rate whereas (ii) increased job search efficiency from the urban informal sector lowers this rate. Aditionally, (iii) urban price subsidy policy lowers the equilibrium urban unemployment rate, and (iv) rural subsidy policy raises this rate.


Agriculture ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 988
Author(s):  
Wei Wang ◽  
Chongmei Zhang ◽  
Jiahao Song ◽  
Dingde Xu

China is an important cotton production area in the world. Since 2014, China has implemented a cotton target price subsidy policy in Xinjiang for 7 years. As the policy implementation time has lengthened, some deep-seated problems have started to emerge. Therefore, it is necessary to summarize and evaluate to clarify the future policy direction of the cotton target price subsidy policy. Based on county-level panel data of Xinjiang and Shandong from 2011 to 2018, this paper used the Propensity Score Matching—Difference in Difference method to analyze the impact of the implementation of cotton target price subsidy policy on cotton planting in Xinjiang. The results showed that: (1) after the implementation of the cotton target price subsidy policy, cotton production was stimulated by the transition, cotton producers’ enthusiasm for cotton production was higher, cotton production increased rapidly, and the yield per unit area decreased, indicating that there was a 'bubble' in cotton cultivation. (2) The target price subsidy policy mainly achieves the expansion of the cotton planting scale by reducing the area of competitive crops. In view of the above research conclusions, this paper further explains its policy implications. It is proposed that the future cotton target price level should be formulated to fully consider the comparative benefits between different crops, to restrict the subjects that enjoy subsidies and the upper limit of subsidies, and strictly implement the concept of green development; it is necessary to guide cotton production out of ecologically vulnerable areas.


Energy Policy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 157 ◽  
pp. 112477
Author(s):  
Hongshan Ai ◽  
Zhengqing Zhou ◽  
Ke Li ◽  
Zhi-Yong Kang

2001 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 497-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jayatilleke S Bandara ◽  
Anthony Chisholm ◽  
Anura Ekanayake ◽  
Sisira Jayasuriya

Food Policy ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 275-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek Byerlee ◽  
T.S. Jayne ◽  
Robert J. Myers

Author(s):  
Douglas Paranahyba de Abreu ◽  
Adriano De Carvalho Paranaiba ◽  
Alcido Elenor Wander

The present article aims to indicate the peculiarities and contradictions found in the price subsidy policies in Brazilian agriculture in the last decade. Despite State efforts carried out through the Minimum Prices Guarantee Policy (PGPM, in the original Portuguese), they have not been a good alternative for several producers. The Austrian School interpretation indicates that the information is not available in a homogenous way to economic agents and price interventions regarding the grant of subsidies, it bears unrevealed costs that raise the information asymmetry of the candidates for the minimum price policy, being unable to reach its objective of reducing such market information asymmetry.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document