Validity and reliability of the Italian version of the Teachers' Sense of Efficacy Scale

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Pintus ◽  
Chiara Bertolini ◽  
Lucia Scipione ◽  
Maja Antonietti
Keyword(s):  
Classroom Management ◽  
Instructional Strategies ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Italian Version ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Sense Of Efficacy ◽  
Three Factor

PurposeThis study investigates the construct validity and reliability of the Italian version of the Teachers' Self-Efficacy Scale (TSES) developed by Tschannen-Moran and Hoy (2001) and contributes to existing research aimed at exploring the elements and variables that influence teachers' self-efficacy levels.Design/methodology/approachThe instrument, translated and adapted in Italian by Cardarello et al. (2017), was tested on a sample of 349 in-service second grade teachers with similar demographic profiles (gender, age, seniority). The study analyzes the data following the exploratory factor analysis.FindingsThe results of this research confirm the relevance of the three-factor model, but opens the possibility of a different organizational structure of the items within the scale. In fact, the results confirmed both the original TSES three-factor structure (student engagement, classroom management, instructional strategies) and a new four-factor structure. The new four-factor structure recognizes two new factors of an instructional nature, “Inclusive instructional strategies, learner-centered” and “Traditional instructional strategies, teacher-centered.” The first one recalls beliefs about capabilities to use strategies and assessments focused on students' needs (inclusive perspective); the second one refers to the dimension of the disciplinary master.Originality/valueAccording to the idea that teachers' self-efficacy is a multidimensional construct, the findings of this study invite to reflect upon the meanings of scale application in different cultural contexts and open a discussion about instructional strategies and the experience of teaching in Italy.

Measuring fairness in franchisor-franchisee relationship: a confirmatory approach

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 158-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ateeque Shaikh ◽  
Saswata Narayan Biswas ◽  
Vanita Yadav ◽  
Debiprasad Mishra
Keyword(s):  
Factor Structure ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Threshold Level ◽  
Fit Indices ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Perceptions Of Fairness ◽  
Three Factor

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop, test and validate a measure of fairness in the context of franchisor-franchisee relationship and test for the dimensionality of fairness. Design/methodology/approach The authors surveyed 300 franchisees of a large-scale franchisor in India. The authors employ confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to analyse the data. Findings The authors tested four models of the fairness construct through CFA using structural equation modelling. The three-factor corrected model of the fairness construct exhibits comparatively better goodness of fit indices as compared to the other correlated models of the fairness construct. It clears the threshold level of validity and reliability test. The findings of the study suggest that the factor structure of fairness is three-factor correlated model with aspects of procedural fairness and informational fairness getting subsumed into one construct. Research limitations/implications Factor structure of fairness construct differs with earlier empirical research findings with both interpersonal fairness and informational fairness subsuming into each other to form one construct. Practical implications This measure can be utilized by franchisee managers to track perceptions of fairness among franchisees to manage the franchise relationship in a better way. Franchisees expect information sharing from the franchisor and not the representative of the franchisor. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to develop a valid and reliable measure of fairness construct in the context of franchise relationship. This study also identifies factor structure of fairness construct.

Factorial structure of the Resiliency Scale for Children and Adolescents (RSCA) among incarcerated male adolescent offenders

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel A. Gibson ◽  
Jane Clarbour
Keyword(s):  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
Emotional Reactivity ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Supporting Evidence ◽  
Male Adolescent ◽  
Adolescent Offenders ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Three Factor

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the factor structure of the Resiliency Scales for Children and Adolescents (RSCA, Prince-Embury, 2006, 2007) and to provide supporting evidence that this is a psychometrically sound measure for practitioners and researchers to use to assess resilience in incarcerated male adolescent offenders in the UK. Design/methodology/approach Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to determine if the factor structure could be replicated among incarcerated male adolescent offenders. Concurrent validation of the measure was also conducted, utilising the Beck Youth Inventory, second edition (BYI-II-II; Beck et al., 2005). Findings CFA of the RSCA was unable to confirm the structure of the measure at an item level, therefore parcelling techniques were utilised similarly to Prince-Embury and Courville (2008), using the subscales for the factors as indicators for the factors. While a three-factor model was found to be an acceptable fit to the data, there was also some support for a two-factor model. Despite this, there was more statistical support for the three-factor model and arguments are made for retaining this structure. Expected associations between the three subscales of sense of mastery, sense of relatedness and emotional reactivity were found with the Beck Youth Inventory demonstrating support for the concurrent validity of the measure in incarcerated male adolescent offenders. Practical implications This paper provides support for the internal structure of the RSCA with incarcerated male adolescent offenders within the UK, although some caution should be used when interpreting scores from the subscales. The findings suggest that the RSCA can be utilised by practitioners to identify young people who may benefit from additional support and also in assessment and treatment/intervention planning. This may be particularly useful when practitioners wish to explore the potential protective nature of resilience. Originality/value The current study is the first of its kind to formally explore the factor structure of the RSCA with incarcerated male adolescent offenders.

Teacher Candidates’ Sense of Self-Efficacy Toward Classroom Management

2019 ◽  
Vol 200 (3) ◽  
pp. 153-163
Author(s):  
Nykela Jackson ◽  
Rachelle Miller
Keyword(s):  
Classroom Management ◽  
Instructional Strategies ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Teacher Candidates ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Sense Of Self ◽  
Teacher Preparation Programs ◽  
Preparation Programs ◽  
Management Tools ◽  
Sense Of Efficacy

The authors examined differences in self-efficacy regarding classroom management practices between alternative teacher candidates (alternative certification [AC]) and traditional teacher candidates (traditional certification [TC]) at one university. The Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale was used as the pre-/post-instrument in a course on classroom management. Quantitative data indicated nonsignificant mean scores for engagement, instructional strategies, and classroom management. Classroom management tools, change in dispositions, and instructional strategies were identified as qualitative themes. Results suggested more ways to authentically involve candidates in understanding and implementing classroom management practices to enhance sense of self-efficacy should be included in teacher preparation programs and courses on classroom management.

scholarly journals TEACHER SELF EFFICACY IN NATIONAL SECONDARY SCHOOLS AT PENINSULAR MALAYSIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (40) ◽  
pp. 160-167
Author(s):  
Fei Shin Liang ◽  
Mei Kin Tai
Keyword(s):  
Student Engagement ◽  
Classroom Management ◽  
Instructional Strategies ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Peninsular Malaysia ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Three Dimensions ◽  
Sense Of Efficacy ◽  
Teacher Self Efficacy ◽  
High Level

Teacher self-efficacy is a cognitive process that allows an individual to measure the level of self-confidence in behavior change. In relation to that, this study was conducted to identify the level of self-efficacy of teachers in National Secondary School (SMK) in Peninsular Malaysia. Three dimensions namely Student Engagement, Instructional Strategies, and Classroom Management were measure in this study. There were 357 teachers selected randomly for this study. Data were collected through a questionnaire using the Teacher Sense of Efficacy Scale (TSES) instrument. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics to describe the level of self-efficacy of teachers. The findings of the study show that the level of self-efficacy of teachers in SMK in Peninsular Malaysia at a high level (Mean = 4.15, SP = .425). Student Engagement dimension (Min = 4.11, SP = .443), Instructional Strategies dimensions (Mean = 4.15, SP = .456) and Classroom Management dimension (Mean = 4.19, SP = .491).

Factorial Structure of the Therapist Adherence Measure-Revised (TAM-R) Within Multisystemic Therapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 427-431
Author(s):  
Aurelie M. C. Lange ◽  
Marc J. M. H. Delsing ◽  
Ron H. J. Scholte ◽  
Rachel E. A. van der Rijken
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Multisystemic Therapy ◽  
Model Fit ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Adherence Measure ◽  
Therapist Adherence ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
The Us

Abstract. The Therapist Adherence Measure (TAM-R) is a central assessment within the quality-assurance system of Multisystemic Therapy (MST). Studies into the validity and reliability of the TAM in the US have found varying numbers of latent factors. The current study aimed to reexamine its factor structure using two independent samples of families participating in MST in the Netherlands. The factor structure was explored using an Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) in Sample 1 ( N = 580). This resulted in a two-factor solution. The factors were labeled “therapist adherence” and “client–therapist alliance.” Four cross-loading items were dropped. Reliability of the resulting factors was good. This two-factor model showed good model fit in a subsequent Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in Sample 2 ( N = 723). The current finding of an alliance component corroborates previous studies and fits with the focus of the MST treatment model on creating engagement.

Information risk, stock returns, and asset pricing: Evidence from China

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 379-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raheel Safdar ◽  
Chen Yan
Keyword(s):  
Stock Returns ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Empirical Literature ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Market Pricing ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Information Risk ◽  
Accruals Quality ◽  
Three Factor

Purpose This study aims to investigate information risk in relation to stock returns of a firm and whether information risk is priced in China. Design/methodology/approach The authors used accruals quality (AQ) as their measure of information risk and performed Fama-Macbeth regressions to investigate association of AQ with future realized stock returns. Moreover, two-stage cross-sectional regression analysis was performed, both at firm level and at portfolio level, to test if the AQ factor is priced in China in addition to existing factors in the Fama French three-factor model. Findings The authors found poor AQ being associated with higher future realized stock returns. Moreover, they found evidence of market pricing of AQ in addition to existing factors in the Fama French three-factor model. Further, subsample analysis revealed that investors value AQ more in non-state owned enterprises than in state owned enterprises. Research limitations/implications The study sample comprises A-shares only and the generalization of the findings is limited by the peculiar institutional and economic setup in China. Originality/value This study contributes to market-based accounting literature by providing further insight into how and if investors value information risk, and it seeks to fill gap in empirical literature by providing evidence from the Chinese capital market.

Advancing the Field of Family Business Research: Further Testing the Measurement Properties of the F-PEC

2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel T. Holt ◽  
Matthew W. Rutherford ◽  
Donald F. Kuratko
Keyword(s):  
Family Business ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Initial Level ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Family Influence ◽  
Measurement Properties ◽  
Business Research ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Scale Data ◽  
Three Factor

The field of family business research is advanced by further examining the validity and reliability of Klein, Astrachan, and Smyrnios’s Family Influence on Power, Experience, and Culture Scale. Data from 831 family businesses are analyzed to assess the measure’s construct validity using exploratory and confirmatory techniques. The hypothesized three-factor model emerged to include culture, power, and experience. Extending the previous effort, the measure’s convergent validity was tested by assessing differences between the measure’s scores and the desires of the senior generation and the commitment of the next generation. Results support an initial level of convergent validity.

Beyond new roads and bridges

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-190
Author(s):  
Lenahan O’Connell ◽  
Juita-Elena (Wie) Yusuf ◽  
Khairul Azfi Anuar
Keyword(s):  
Factor Model ◽  
Public Support ◽  
Mass Transit ◽  
Light Rail ◽  
Urban Context ◽  
Public Preferences ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Hampton Roads ◽  
Infrastructure Investments ◽  
Three Factor

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to compare public preferences for investment and spending on non-automobile infrastructures (mass transit and bicycling) to preferences for new roads and the repair of current highways. The study explores the factors that explain preferences for non-automobile infrastructure using a three-factor model including self-interest (personal transportation benefits), concern for community-wide benefits (political beliefs), and concern for the economic impact. The study uses a case study of the urban context of the Hampton Roads region of Southeastern Virginia (USA). Design/methodology/approach The analysis uses data from a 2013 telephone survey of urban residents in the Hampton Roads area. Survey respondents were asked to identify their two investment priorities from four options: repairing existing roads, bridges, and tunnels; constructing new or expanding roads, bridges, and tunnels; expanding mass transit; and expanding bicycle routes and improving bike safety. Findings Repairing existing highway infrastructure is the most popular spending priority (66 percent of residents). There is as much support (46 percent) for investing in non-automobile infrastructure as for investing in new roads, bridges, and tunnels. Significant predictors of support for non-automobile infrastructure, using the three-factor model, are: length of commute time, self-identification as liberal, use of light rail, and a belief that light rail contributes to economic development. Originality/value The study examines public preferences for both non-traditional and traditional transportation infrastructure investments. It highlights the factors that contribute to public support for different transportation spending options.

scholarly journals Exploring the dimensionality of the TRIM-18 in the Spanish context

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Fernández-Capo ◽  
Silvia Recoder ◽  
Juana Gómez-Benito ◽  
María Gámiz ◽  
Pilar Gual ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
Spanish Population ◽  
Factor Analyses ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽  
Reliability Method ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Potential Use ◽  
Three Factor

<p>Introduction: The Transgression-Related Interpersonal Motivation (TRIM-18) Inventory is an instrument that assesses episodic forgiveness. This scale is composed of three subscales: <em>avoidance</em>, <em>revenge</em> and <em>benevolence</em>. The present study examined the dimensionality of the Spanish version of the TRIM-18 (TRIM-18-S) and provided evidence of validity and reliability. Method: A total of 943 participants completed the TRIM-18-S.  A subset of 277 participants completed additional measures of empathy, anger, and information regarding the relation with the offender. Results: The TRIM-18-S showed good psychometric properties, and confirmatory factor analyses revealed a three-factor structure. Conclusions: The scale presents adequate psychometric properties for its potential use in a Spanish population.</p><p> </p>

scholarly journals Reliability and Validity of the Persian Version Emotional Self-efficacy Scale for Young Adolescents

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-70
Author(s):  
Zahra Mohammadi ◽  
◽  
Zohreh Meshkati ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
First Grade ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
School Students ◽  
Statistical Population ◽  
Persian Version

Background: The present research aimed at determining the reliability and validity of the Persian version of the Emotional Self-Efficiency Scale (ESES) for adolescents of Isfahan city. This study was conducted using a developmental research method. The statistical population consisted of all the first-grade high school students of Isfahan city in 2018 (n=59396). Methods: A total number of 280 students (160 girls and 120 boys, mean±SD age of 12.98±1.14) were selected using a stratified random sampling method, and completed ESES for adolescents (2015), as well as Self-Efficacy Questionnaire for Children (2001). Results: An Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) revealed the four-factor structure of ESES. A Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) also confirmed the fit of the four-factor structure of the scale. The results of the within-group correlation coefficient were obtained to investigate the acceptable test-retest reliability. The results of the correlation between the above-mentioned scale and SEQ-C instrument was also significant (P<0.05). Moreover, ESES and its dimensions had proper reliability over time. The reliability obtained by Cronbach’s alpha for all four dimensions of the questionnaire, given the number of items, was higher than 0.5 for each dimension and higher than 0.7 for the whole scale, which was acceptable. Conclusion: These findings indicate the acceptable validity and reliability of ESES for Isfahan’s adolescents, and its validity and reliability should be investigated in broader research on Iranian children and adolescents.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document