Functional goat meat nuggets fortified with novel bioactive Carica papaya L. and Origanum vulgare extracts and storage stability thereof

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 402-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niraj S. Jagtap ◽  
Rajesh V. Wagh ◽  
Manish Kumar Chatli ◽  
Om Prakash Malav ◽  
Pavan Kumar ◽  
...  

Purpose This paper aims to highlight the candidature of papaya/Carica papaya L. extracts (PLE) and oregano/Origanum vulgare leaves extract (OLE) as novel natural antioxidants, which was further fortified into goat meat nuggets to evaluate quality changes and storage stability at refrigeration temperature (4 ± 1ºC) for 20 days. Design/methodology/approach Three different products, namely, control (without phyto-extracts), T−1: PLE (0.5 per cent) and T-2: OLE (1.0 per cent) fortified goat meat nuggets, were prepared and subjected for various quality attributes with relation to storage stability. Findings It was observed that pH significantly (p = 0.14) decreased till 10th day of storage i.e. from 6.49 to 6.32 (control), 6.37 to 6.28 (T−1) and 6.45 to 6.43 (T-2) afterword showed increasing trend till further storage of 20 days in control, as well as treated products. Water activity was non-significant (p = 0.01) on first day of storage and decreased up to 20th day. PLE treated product showed good margin of microbiological protection followed by OLE and least was found in control. L* value showed increasing trend (p = 0.03) throughout storage and ranged from 50.15 to 54.27, while a* values were decreased significantly from 10.36 to 9.06, 10.86 to 9.49 in PLE (p = 0.02) and OLE (p = 0.03), respectively. Sensory panel awarded the highest score for fortified goat meat nuggets, justifying the best quality attributes in term of texture attributes of the treated products. Thus, papaya and oregano leave extracts proved in the extension of shelf life and can be further harvested to develop functional goat meat nuggets. Research limitations/implications In search of novel bioactive phyto-extract, meat industry focussed most of the research towards natural anti-oxidants. In the view of same, the present research strategy was planned to examine candidature of Carica papaya L. and OLEs as novel natural antioxidant into meat system during aerobic packaging storage. Goat meat nuggets are amongst the most convenient and famous snack, as well as nutritious meat products, but lacks functional properties. Therefore, with implication of present research at practical level, meat industry can develop function goat meat nuggets by incorporating Carica papaya L. and Origanum vulgare extracts as natural and novel bioactive antioxidants with improved functionality. Originality/value This is the first attempt to develop functional goat meat nuggets incorporated with papaya/Carica papaya L. and oregano/OLE. This research can lead to be a pioneer work in meat science.

2017 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 154-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devendra Kumar ◽  
Manish Kumar Chatli ◽  
Raghvendar Singh ◽  
Nitin Mehta ◽  
Pavan Kumar

Purpose The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of camel milk protein hydrolysates (CMPHs) on physico-chemical, sensory, colour profile and textural quality attributes of chevon patties. Design/methodology/approach Camel milk proteins were hydrolyzed with three different proteolytic enzymes, viz., alcalase (CMPH-A), α-chymotrypsin (CMPH-C) and papain (CMPH-P), and dried to powder form before further utilization. Four treatments were prepared with incorporation of CMPH, viz., CMPH 0 per cent (C), CMPH-A 0.09 per cent (T1), CMPH-C 0.06 per cent (T2) and CMPH-P 0.09 per cent (T3), in the product formulation. The developed goat meat patties were evaluated for physico-chemical (pH; emulsion stability, ES; cooking yield, CY; water activity, aw), instrumental colour and texture profile and sensory attributes. Findings The pH, moisture, fat and ES values of goat meat emulsions were comparable amongst treatments as well as with the control; however, treated emulsions had higher ES and moisture content. The pH and moisture per cent of cooked chevon patties varied significantly, whereas other physico-chemical (CY, aw, per cent protein, per cent fat, per cent ash and per cent dietary fibre) as well as dimensional parameters (per cent gain in height and decrease in diameter) were comparable amongst treatments and the control. Hardness, springiness, stringiness, cohesiveness, gumminess and resilience of chevon patties decreased significantly (p < 0.05) with the incorporation of CMPH than that of the control; however, the values were comparable among all the treated products. Protein hydrolysate in chevon patties resulted in significant increase in redness (a*) values, whereas all other parameters (L*, b* and hue) decreased significantly as compared to that of the control. The colour and appearance, texture, juiciness overall acceptability scores were comparable in all the treated products and were significantly (p < 0.05) higher than the control. The flavour scores of C, T1 and T3 were comparable but significantly lower than that of T2. The overall acceptability scores of T1 and T2 were also comparable and significantly higher than C and T3; however, the highest score was recorded for T2. Practical implications Results concluded that chevon patties with acceptable sensory attributes and improved CY and textural attributes can be successfully developed with the incorporation of CMPH. Originality/value The protein hydrolysates of different food proteins could be explored in a same pattern to find out their implication in food matrices.


2007 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 550-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arun K. Das ◽  
R.B. Sharma ◽  
N.P. Singh

2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 649-657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pavan Kumar ◽  
Manish Kumar Chatli ◽  
Nitin Mehta ◽  
O.P. Malav ◽  
Akhilesh K. Verma ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Kehinde Oke ◽  
Michael Ayodele Idowu ◽  
Olajide Philip Sobukola ◽  
H. Adegoke Bakare

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
G. Mahapatra ◽  
S. Biswas ◽  
G. Patra ◽  
A. K. Vidyarthi ◽  
R. Banerjee

2018 ◽  
Vol 111 ◽  
pp. 379-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leda C.M. Cunha ◽  
Maria Lúcia G. Monteiro ◽  
José M. Lorenzo ◽  
Paulo E.S. Munekata ◽  
Voster Muchenje ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document