Sensitivity analysis of geotechnical site conditions effect on the seismic response of a saturated inhomogeneous poroviscoelastic soil profile

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 661-677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toufiq Ouzandja ◽  
Mohamed Hadid
Keyword(s):  
Soil Properties ◽  
Seismic Response ◽  
Pore Water ◽  
Soil Profile ◽  
Water Saturation ◽  
Free Field ◽  
Response Spectra ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Linear And Nonlinear

Purpose This paper aims to present the investigation of the linear and nonlinear seismic site response of a saturated inhomogeneous poroviscoelastic soil profile for different soil properties, such as pore-water saturation, non-cohesive fines content FC, permeability k, porosity n and coefficient of uniformity Cu. Design/methodology/approach The inhomogeneous soil profile is idealized as a multi-layered saturated poroviscoelastic medium and is characterized by the Biot’s theory, with a shear modulus varying continuously with depth according to the Wichtmann’s model. Seismic response analysis has been evaluated through a computational model, which is based on the exact stiffness matrix method formulated in the frequency domain assuming that the incoming seismic waves consist of inclined P-SV waves. Findings Unlike the horizontal seismic response, the results indicate that the vertical one is strongly affected by the pore water saturation. Moreover, in the case of fully saturated soil profile, the same vertical response spectra are found for the two cases of soil behavior, linear and nonlinear. Originality/value This research is a detailed study of the geotechnical soil properties effect on the bi-directional seismic response of saturated inhomogeneous poroviscoelastic soil profile, which has not been treated before; the results are presented in terms of the peak acceleration ratio, as well as the free-field response spectra and the spectral ratio (V/H).

Free-Field Seismic Response Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Angina ◽  
Andrea Steri ◽  
Stefano Stacul ◽  
Diego Lo Presti
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Response ◽  
Free Field ◽  
Ground Level ◽  
Response Spectra ◽  
Site Investigation ◽  
Building Code ◽  
Elastic Response ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
Elastic Response Spectra ◽  
The Time Domain

This paper shows the results of free-field seismic response analyses (SRA), that were performed for the subsoil conditions of Piazza dei Miracoli in Pisa. The site investigation and in particular the shear wave velocity profile is extended down to 120 m below the ground level. One-dimensional SRA were carried out by using three computer codes, EERA, STRATA and ONDA. The first two codes perform the analyses in the frequency domain considering a linear-equivalent soil model. ONDA analyses the problem in the time domain assuming a true non-linear soil behaviour. In particular, the Ramberg-Osgood constitutive model, coupled with a modified Masing criterion was assumed. The computed elastic response spectra were compared to those prescribed by the Italian Building Code, which represents the Italian implementation of Eurocodes. Some details concerning the response spectra prescribed by Italian Building Code are also given.

Nonstationary Probabilistic Seismic Response Analysis of Nonlinear Soil Profile under Bidirectional Dynamic Loading

2012 ◽  
Vol 193-194 ◽  
pp. 949-953
Author(s):  
Xiao Dong Pan ◽  
Jia En Zhong ◽  
Chao Chao He
Keyword(s):  
Spectral Density ◽  
Seismic Response ◽  
Ground Motion ◽  
Power Spectral Density ◽  
Soil Profile ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
Time Varying ◽  
Seismic Response Analysis ◽  
Dynamic Reliability ◽  
Power Spectral

In this paper, according to the characteristics of near-fault earthquakes, combined with the strong ground motion attenuation law in China, the nonstationary power spectrum of bidirectional ground motion input is obtained through random vibration analysis. By introducing the pseudo excitation algorithm, the evolutionary power spectral density (PSD) of acceleration at the engineering bedrock is handled as the nonstationary pseudo input, and the Hardin-Drnevich hyperbolic model is utilized to take into account the nonlinearity of soil layer. On this basis, finite element method in the time domain and frequency domain are used for seismic response analysis of soil profile. Values including various time-varying power spectral density of the dynamic response, time varying RMS and time-dependent reliability at different threshold can be obtained by calculating, which provides a basis for the analysis of the foundation dynamic reliability assessment.

Study on the Characters of Seismic Response Spectra Based on China Financial Information Mansion

2014 ◽  
Vol 580-583 ◽  
pp. 1729-1733
Author(s):  
Ming Li ◽  
Yuan Qing Wang ◽  
Wei Tao ◽  
Bin Wang ◽  
Qing Xian Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Response ◽  
Response Spectrum ◽  
Response Spectra ◽  
Financial Information ◽  
Amplification Coefficient ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
Magnification Factor ◽  
Characteristic Period ◽  
Seismic Coefficient ◽  
Dynamic Magnification Factor

Rare study is done on floor response spectrum of super-high rise building, but it is an important condition for the seismic response analysis of floor subsidiary structure. Therefore, based on the early calculation model of China Financial Information Mansion, the floor response spectrum is calculated under different input ground motion. The floor and ground response spectrum is compared with each other from the seismic coefficient, dynamic amplification coefficient, characteristic period and the form of response spectrum. The results shows that: the floor seismic coefficient and the magnification coefficient are greater or smaller than the ground ones, the biggest difference of which is nearly 1 times; all the floor character period are greater than the ground ones, the biggest difference of which is over 60%; there are obvious differences between the floor and ground dynamic magnification factor spectra form under some conditions, of which the second peak of the former one is probably very large, even near to the peak of the first one, while the latter has no such phenomenon. Therefore, during the process of calculating the seismic response of floor subsidiary structure, it is necessary to consider the change of floor seismic coefficient, dynamic magnification factor, characteristic period and spectra form based on the main structure.

Study on the Ground Response Analysis for Stiff Soil

2014 ◽  
Vol 915-916 ◽  
pp. 122-125
Author(s):  
Xiao Fei Li ◽  
Rui Sun ◽  
Xiao Bo Yu
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Response ◽  
Working Conditions ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Response Spectra ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
Seismic Response Analysis ◽  
Ground Response Analysis ◽  
Ground Acceleration ◽  
Strong Motion Records ◽  
Stiff Soil

In order to test the applicable of the seismic response analysis procedures SHAKE2000 and LSSRLI-1 for class ІІ site, 17 stations and 35 underground strong motion records of KiK-net are selected from Class ІІ site. 210 working conditions are used to verify the applicability of the two soil seismic response analysis programs at Class ІІ site. These two programs are used to calculate the selected working conditions, giving the peak acceleration of the ground, the shear strain and the ground acceleration response spectra. By analyzing the results of the two programs and the measured results to assess the degree of difference between the two methods and which program is closer to the real situation. Studies have shown that in class ІІ site, in most cases, the results of SHAKE2000 and LSSRLI-1 differ little. While comparing with the actual records, SHAKE2000 is closer to the strong motion records.

scholarly journals A MPM framework for large deformation seismic response analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Kohler ◽  
Andreas Stoecklin ◽  
Alexander M. Puzrin
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Conditions ◽  
Seismic Response ◽  
Large Deformation ◽  
Free Field ◽  
Large Mass ◽  
Material Point ◽  
Ground Movement ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
Seismic Response Analysis ◽  
Seismic Triggering

Landslides are often triggered by earthquakes and can cause immense damage due to large mass movements. To model such large-deformation events, the material point method (MPM) has become increasingly popular in recent years. A limitation of existing MPM implementations is the lack of appropriate boundary conditions to perform seismic response analysis of slopes. In this article, an extension to the basic MPM framework is proposed for simulating the seismic triggering and subsequent collapse of slopes within a single analysis step. Original implementations of a compliant base boundary and free-field boundary conditions in the MPM framework are presented, enabling the application of input ground motions while accounting for the absorption of outgoing waves and the free-ground movement at the lateral boundaries. An example slope is analysed to illustrate the proposed procedure and to benchmark it against the results obtained using an independent simulation technique, based on a three-step FE analysis. The comparison generally shows a good agreement of the results obtained from the two independent procedures and highlights advantages of the presented “all-in-one” MPM approach, in particular for long duration strong motions.

scholarly journals Study on the influence of seafloor soft soil layer on seismic ground motion

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingyan Lan ◽  
Juan Liu ◽  
Xing Song
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Response ◽  
Ground Motion ◽  
Sea Water ◽  
Response Spectrum ◽  
Soft Soil ◽  
Free Field ◽  
Soil Layer ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
Peak Acceleration ◽  
Seismic Response Analysis

Abstract. In the complex medium system of sea area, the overlying sea water and the surface soft soil have a significant impact on the seafloor ground motion, which brings great seismic risk to the safety of offshore engineering structures. In this paper, four sets of typical free field models are constructed and established, which are land model, land model with surface soft soil, sea model and sea model with surface soft soil. The dynamic finite difference method is used to carry out two-dimensional seismic response analysis of typical free field based on the input forms about P and SV wave. By comparing the seismic response analysis results of four groups of calculation models, the effects of overlying seawater and soft soil on peak acceleration and acceleration response spectrum are studied. The results show that when SV wave is input, the peak acceleration and response spectrum of the surface of soft soil on the surface and the seabed surface can be amplified, while the overlying sea water can significantly reduce the ground motion. When P wave is used, the effect of overlying seawater and soft soil on peak acceleration and response spectrum of surface and seabed can be ignored. The peak acceleration decreases first and then increases from the bottom to the surface, and the difference of peak acceleration calculated by four free field models is not obvious. The results show that the overlying sea water and the surface soft soil layer have little effect on the peak acceleration of ground motion below the surface.

Study on Piping Response Under Multiple Excitation: Part 2 — Validation for Multiple Excitation Analysis of Piping

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoru Kai ◽  
Tomoyoshi Watakabe ◽  
Naoaki Kaneko ◽  
Kunihiro Tochiki ◽  
Makoto Moriizumi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Response ◽  
Seismic Design ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Response Spectrum ◽  
Time History ◽  
Response Spectra ◽  
Shaking Table ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
Multiple Time ◽  
Floor Response Spectra

The piping in a nuclear power plant is laid across multiple floors of a single building or two buildings, which are supported at many points. As the piping is excited by multiple-inputs from the supporting points during an earthquake, seismic response analysis by multiple excitations is needed to obtain the exact seismic response of the piping. However, few experiments involving such multiple excitation have been performed to verify the validity of multiple excitation analysis. Therefore, analysis of the seismic design of piping in Japan is performed by the enveloped Floor Response Spectrum (FRS), which covers all floor response spectra at all supporting points. The piping response estimated by enveloped FRS is conservative in most cases compared with the actual seismic response by multiple excitations. To perform rational seismic design and evaluation, it is important to investigate the seismic response by multiple excitations and to verify the validity of the analytical method by multiple excitation test. This paper reports the validation results of the multiple-excitation analysis of piping compared with the results of the multiple excitations shaking test using triple uni-axial shaking table and a 3-dimensional piping model (89.1mm diameter and 5.5mm thickness). Three directional moments from the analysis and the shaking test were compared on the validation. As the result, it is confirmed that the analysis by multiple time history excitation corresponds with the test result.

Evaluation of the effect of depth to bedrock on seismic amplification phenomena

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
gaetano falcone ◽  
giuseppe naso ◽  
stefania fabozzi ◽  
federico mori ◽  
massimiliano moscatelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Waves ◽  
Site Response ◽  
Soft Soil ◽  
Free Field ◽  
Response Spectra ◽  
Maximum Depth ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
Local Conditions ◽  
Seismic Amplification ◽  
Bedrock Depth

<p>When an earthquake occurs, the propagation of the seismic waves is conditioned by local conditions, e.g., depth to seismic bedrock and impedance ratio between soft soil and seismic bedrock. Bearing in mind that the maximum depth of site prospections generally does not extend up to seismic bedrock depth, a parametric study was carried out with reference to ideal case studies in order to investigate the effect on local seismic amplification of the depth to bedrock.</p><p>The results are presented in terms of charts of amplification factors (i.e., ratio of integral quantities referred to free-field and reference response spectra) and minimum depth to investigate vs building type. These charts will allow defining the thickness of the cover deposit that should be characterised in terms of geophysical and geotechnical parameters in order to perform seismic site response analysis according to a precautionary approach, in areas where depth to seismic bedrock is higher than conventional maximum depth of site surveys.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document