scholarly journals Regularizing the Deepsurv Network Using Projection Loss For Medical Risk Assessment

IEEE Access ◽  
2022 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Phawis Thammasorn ◽  
Stephanie K. Schaub ◽  
Daniel S. Hippe ◽  
Matthew B. Spraker ◽  
Jan C. Peeken ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2003 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason H. Goodchild ◽  
Michael Glick
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-277
Author(s):  
Nigel Jepson ◽  
◽  
Rienk Rienks ◽  
David Smart ◽  
Michael H Bennett ◽  
...  

The South Pacific Underwater Medicine Society (SPUMS) diving medical for recreational scuba divers was last reviewed in 2011. From 2011 to 2019, considerable advancements have occurred in cardiovascular risk assessment relevant to divers. The SPUMS 48th (2019) Annual Scientific Meeting theme was cardiovascular risk assessment in diving. The meeting had multiple presentations updating scientific information about assessing cardiovascular risk. These were distilled into a new set of guidelines at the final conference workshop. SPUMS guidelines for medical risk assessment in recreational diving have subsequently been updated and modified including a new Appendix C: Suggested evaluation of the cardiovascular system for divers. The revised evaluation of the cardiovascular system for divers covers the following topics: 1. Background information on the relevance of cardiovascular risk and diving; 2. Defining which divers with cardiovascular problems should not dive, or whom require treatment interventions before further review; 3. Recommended screening procedures (flowchart) for divers aged 45 and over; 4. Assessment of divers with known or symptomatic cardiovascular disease, including guidance on assessing divers with specific diagnoses such as hypertension, atrial fibrillation, cardiac pacemaker, immersion pulmonary oedema, takotsubo cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and persistent (patent) foramen ovale; 5. Additional cardiovascular health questions included in the SPUMS guidelines for medical risk assessment in recreational diving; 6. Updated general cardiovascular medical risk assessment advice; 7. Referencing of relevant literature. The essential elements of this guideline are presented in this paper.


2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 2325-2331 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Michael Meneghini ◽  
Mary Ziemba-Davis ◽  
Marshall K. Ishmael ◽  
Alexander L. Kuzma ◽  
Peter Caccavallo

1995 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-43
Author(s):  
W. Malkusch ◽  
B. Rehn ◽  
J. Bruch

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 1523-1538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharlene Hesse-Biber ◽  
Bailey Flynn ◽  
Keeva Farrelly

The growth of the Internet since the millennium has opened up a myriad of opportunities for education, particularly in medicine. Although those looking for health care information used to have to turn to a face-to-face doctor’s visit, an immense library of medical advice is now available at their fingertips. The BRCA genetic predispositions (mutations of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer genes) which expose men and women to greater risk of breast, ovarian, and other cancers can be researched extensively online. Several nonprofit organizations now offer online risk assessment and decision-making tools meant to supplement conversation with medical professionals, which in actuality are quickly replacing it. We argue here through a critical qualitative template analysis of several such tools that the discursive frameworks utilized are prone to fearmongering, commercialization, and questionable validity. Left unchecked, these assessment tools could do more harm than good in driving young women especially to take unnecessary extreme surgical action.


1992 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 316-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
J A Talcott ◽  
R D Siegel ◽  
R Finberg ◽  
L Goldman

PURPOSE The study was undertaken to validate a clinical model for predicting the medical risk of cancer patients with fever and neutropenia. PATIENTS AND METHODS A consecutive sample of 444 cancer patients with fever and neutropenia (granulocyte count less than 500/microL) at two hospitals, a specialized cancer referral center and a university-affiliated general medical hospital, was studied to identify clinical characteristics in the first 24 hours that predict subsequent serious medical complications during the hospital stay. To control for bias, major risk factors and complications were subject to blinded review. RESULTS Serious medical complications occurred in 34% of patients with risk factors identified in a prior study, including prior inpatient status (group I), outpatients with a serious independent comorbidity (group II), or uncontrolled cancer (group III), compared with 5% of the remaining patients (group IV) (P less than .000001). Two of the complications in group IV patients were transient asymptomatic hypotension, and the remaining three complications occurred after at least 1 week of progressive medical deterioration. These risk groups were independently significant in stepwise logistic regression analysis. Multiple complications (17%) and death (10%) were common among patients in groups I through III but did not occur in group IV patients. CONCLUSIONS This risk assessment model accurately stratified the medical risk of these patients using only clinical information available on the first day of their course. Low-risk patients are an appropriate population in which to study less intensive treatment strategies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document