Industrial Dataspace: A Broker to Run Cyber-Physical-Social Production System in Level of Machining Workshops

Author(s):  
Pingyu Jiang ◽  
Chao Liu ◽  
Pulin Li ◽  
Haoliang Shi
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dora Kazaryan ◽  
Vitaly Chulkov

In need of increase in effective management of human resources and, as a result, - enhancement of organizational structures of management, there is always a need to find out: whether it is possible to modernize the existing organizational structure of management or in the course of reorganization it is necessary to create new structure. The basic model of a cycle of reorganization constructed in 1996 as one of fundamental developments of society was result of the researches executed by school of sciences "Infografichesky bases of functional systems". At the same time reorganization is understood as the method of transformation of physical, virtual, legal, legal and other objects and processes of activities (merge, separation, accession, allocation, the termination, origin, etc.) allowing a possibility of partial or basic change of organization-legal and legal forms, technologies, methods and means of its implementation. Cycle of reorganization are the four interconnected stages: device, disorganization, reorganization, soorganization. In a social production system of transport sector of managing of the country all listed stages of a basic cycle of reorganization are closely connected with objective need of fixed updating of technical means, technologies of their production and use in case of operation, and also transport and handling services. As a result of such updating which is carried out without system study in the form of local operational changes in invariable organizational structures of management the stratifications significantly influencing the relations of certain figures and their groups breaking the relations and results of activities which are initially pledged in these structures accumulate. At the same time officially in a directive way appointed regulation of such relations upon lags behind real dynamics of production life and doesn't allow to realize possibilities of antropotechnical management fully.


IKON ◽  
2014 ◽  
pp. 27-28
Author(s):  
Paolo Braga ◽  
Erica Negri ◽  
Michele Zatta

2010 ◽  
Vol 4 (supplement) ◽  
pp. 46-63
Author(s):  
Vidar Thorsteinsson

The paper explores the relation of Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri's work to that of Deleuze and Guattari. The main focus is on Hardt and Negri's concept of ‘the common’ as developed in their most recent book Commonwealth. It is argued that the common can complement what Nicholas Thoburn terms the ‘minor’ characteristics of Deleuze's political thinking while also surpassing certain limitations posed by Hardt and Negri's own previous emphasis on ‘autonomy-in-production’. With reference to Marx's notion of real subsumption and early workerism's social-factory thesis, the discussion circles around showing how a distinction between capital and the common can provide a basis for what Alberto Toscano calls ‘antagonistic separation’ from capital in a more effective way than can the classical capital–labour distinction. To this end, it is demonstrated how the common might benefit from being understood in light of Deleuze and Guattari's conceptual apparatus, with reference primarily to the ‘body without organs’ of Anti-Oedipus. It is argued that the common as body without organs, now understood as constituting its own ‘social production’ separate from the BwO of capital, can provide a new basis for antagonistic separation from capital. Of fundamental importance is how the common potentially invents a novel regime of qualitative valorisation, distinct from capital's limitation to quantity and scarcity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document