Understanding the Digital Native Behaviors of College Students from Computer Experience

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shun Xu ◽  
Shan Jiang
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Digital Native ◽  
Computer Experience

Gender Differences in Computer Attitudes and Use among College Students

1997 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lily Shashaani
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Gender Differences ◽  
Gender Gap ◽  
Parental Behavior ◽  
Computer Training ◽  
Computer Attitudes ◽  
Computer Experience ◽  
Parental Encouragement ◽  
Students Attitudes

In this study we examined the gender gap in computer attitudes and use based on a sample of 202 college students. We surveyed the students' attitudes in relation to gender, experience, and parental encouragement. Students responded differently in regard to attitudes and experience: females were less interested in computers and less confident than males; males were more experienced. Further analysis of the students' responses showed that one semester of computer training improved their attitude toward computers. The results are discussed in terms of students' precollege computer experience and parental behavior.

Deaf College Students and Computers: The Beneficial Effect of Experience on Attitudes

1989 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 219-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate MacKowiak
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Computer Anxiety ◽  
Computer Attitudes ◽  
Attitudes Toward Computers ◽  
Computer Experience ◽  
Spring Semester ◽  
Students Attitudes ◽  
Level Of Significance ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Three Components

The impact of individual differences on deaf college students' attitudes toward computers was investigated. Three components of computer attitudes were examined: liking, anxiety, confidence. Mean scores for each component were calculated. Subjects ( n = 131) were students of both sexes who responded to a questionnaire (alpha .89 for the fall semester and .92 for the spring semester). A t-test did not yield significant differences in the two administrations. The sample positively responded to lack of computer anxiety, and indicated computer liking. Students' confidence level was low. Analyses of variance procedures (.05 level of significance) were run to determine the effect of age, sex, computer experience and major on attitudes. Age, sex, and major were not statistically significant. Computer experience had main affect on all three components of computer attitudes. Interaction by age, sex, experience, and major, was statistically significant for computer anxiety only.

Psychology of Computer Use: XXXVII. Computer-Related Stress and Amount of Computer Experience

1996 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 968-970 ◽  
Author(s):  
Collin T. Ballance ◽  
Vickie V. Ballance
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Computer Technology ◽  
Computer Use ◽  
Computer Experience ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Related Stress

57 college students were surveyed using Hudiburg's revised Computer Technology Hassles Scale. From additional information, groups with various amounts of experience were formed. Comparison suggests that computer-related stress is not simply a by-product of increased interaction with computers.

Psychology of Computer Use: XXVII. Relating Self-Rated Computer Experience to Computer Stress

1993 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 680-682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Collin T. Ballance ◽  
Vickie V. Ballance
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Computer Technology ◽  
Computer Use ◽  
Computer Experience

College students were surveyed using Hudiburg's Computer Technology Hassles Scale and their computer experience. Students with low, moderate, and high computer experience ( ns = 67, 77, and 37) appeared to perceive the same interactions as unpleasant. The students selected unpleasant interactions in the same numbers and with the same intensity.

Lessons Learned From Coaching Postsecondary Students With Traumatic Brain Injury

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-96
Author(s):  
Mary R. T. Kennedy
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Sense Of Self ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Sudden Onset ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Speech Language Pathologists ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Exhaustive List

Purpose The purpose of this clinical focus article is to provide speech-language pathologists with a brief update of the evidence that provides possible explanations for our experiences while coaching college students with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Method The narrative text provides readers with lessons we learned as speech-language pathologists functioning as cognitive coaches to college students with TBI. This is not meant to be an exhaustive list, but rather to consider the recent scientific evidence that will help our understanding of how best to coach these college students. Conclusion Four lessons are described. Lesson 1 focuses on the value of self-reported responses to surveys, questionnaires, and interviews. Lesson 2 addresses the use of immediate/proximal goals as leverage for students to update their sense of self and how their abilities and disabilities may alter their more distal goals. Lesson 3 reminds us that teamwork is necessary to address the complex issues facing these students, which include their developmental stage, the sudden onset of trauma to the brain, and having to navigate going to college with a TBI. Lesson 4 focuses on the need for college students with TBI to learn how to self-advocate with instructors, family, and peers.

Case Studies for Telepractice in AAC

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanya Rose Curtis
Keyword(s):  
Service Delivery ◽  
Case Studies ◽  
Eye Gaze ◽  
Cognitive Impairments ◽  
Perceived Barriers ◽  
Computer Experience ◽  
Access Methods ◽  
Complex Communication Needs ◽  
Barriers To Service ◽  
Communication Needs

As the field of telepractice grows, perceived barriers to service delivery must be anticipated and addressed in order to provide appropriate service delivery to individuals who will benefit from this model. When applying telepractice to the field of AAC, additional barriers are encountered when clients with complex communication needs are unable to speak, often present with severe quadriplegia and are unable to position themselves or access the computer independently, and/or may have cognitive impairments and limited computer experience. Some access methods, such as eye gaze, can also present technological challenges in the telepractice environment. These barriers can be overcome, and telepractice is not only practical and effective, but often a preferred means of service delivery for persons with complex communication needs.

Effects of Physical Training on Stuttering

1968 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 767-776 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Don Franks ◽  
Elizabeth B. Franks
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Group Therapy ◽  
Physical Training ◽  
Cardiovascular Response ◽  
Training Group ◽  
Physical Stress ◽  
Submaximal Exercise ◽  
Endurance Running ◽  
Response To Exercise

Eight college students enrolled in group therapy for stuttering were divided into two equal groups for 20 weeks. The training group supplemented therapy with endurance running and calisthenics three days per week. The subjects were tested prior to and at the conclusion of the training on a battery of stuttering tests and cardiovascular measures taken at rest, after stuttering, and after submaximal exercise. There were no significant differences (0.05 level) prior to training. At the conclusion of training, the training group was significandy better in cardiovascular response to exercise and stuttering. Although physical training did not significantly aid the reduction of stuttering as measured in this study, training did cause an increased ability to adapt physiologically to physical stress and to the stress of stuttering.

The Effects of a Neutral Stimulus (Buzzer) on Motor Responses and Disfluencies in Normal Speakers

1969 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 179-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard R. Martin ◽  
Gerald M. Siegel
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Neutral Stimulus ◽  
Motor Responses ◽  
Control Subjects ◽  
And Control ◽  
Speaking Task

Seventy-two college students were divided into three groups: Button Push-Speech (BP-S), Speech-Button Push (S-BP), and Control. BP-S subjects pushed one of two buttons on signal for 8 min. During the last 4 min, depression of the criterion button caused a buzzer to sound. After the button-push task, subjects spoke spontaneously for 30 min. During the last 20 min, the buzzer was presented contingent upon each disfluency. S-BP subjects were run under the same procedures, but the order of button-push and speech tasks was reversed. Control subjects followed the same procedures as S-BP subjects, but no buzzer signal was presented at any time. Both S-BP and BP-S subjects emitted significantly fewer disfluencies during the last 20 min (Conditioning) than during the first 10 min (Baserate) of the speaking task. The frequency of disfluencies for Control subjects did not change significantly from Baserate to Conditioning. In none of the three groups did the frequency of pushes on the criterion button change significantly from minute to minute throughout the 8-min button-push session.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document