Integrating roboticist values into a Value Sensitive Design framework for humanoid robots

Author(s):  
EunJeong Cheon ◽  
Norman Makoto Su
Robotica ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronnie Joseph Wong ◽  
James Andrew Smith

SUMMARYWhile Sit-to-Stand and Stand-to-Sit are routine activities and are crucial pre-requisites to walking and running their underlying dynamics are poorly understood. Furthermore, the potential for using these movements to regenerate energy in energy-sensitive devices such as orthoses, prostheses and humanoid robots has never been examined. Insights in this domain can lead to more energy-efficient prosthesis, orthosis and humanoid robot designs.OBJECTIVES: The objectives are two-fold: first, to determine how much energy can be regenerated during standard movements related to transitions between sitting and standing on a scale humanoid model and second, to determine if the chosen actuator could produce better results if the gear ratio were modified. This manuscript's main contribution to the literature is by showing which joint provides the most regenerative effect during transitions between sitting and standing.MODEL DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION: Joint trajectories from existing biomechanics trials of sitting and standing transitions were fed into a 1/10 scale model of a humanoid robot. The robot model, developed in MapleSim, is comprised of standard and off-the-shelf subcomponents, including amplifier, NiMH battery and Robotis Dynamixel RX-28 actuators.RESULTS: Using the RX-28 actuator, the ankle, knee and hip joints all show a degree of regenerative effects, the hip demonstrates the most dramatic levels during the transition from standing to sitting. This contrasts with recent publications which show that the knee has the most important regenerative effects during walking and running. It is also found that for under 3 degree trajectory error the regenerative effect is best for all joints when the gear ratio is increased from the RX-28's 193:1 value to a value of approximately 760:1 for the ankle, 630:1 for the knee and 600:1 for the hip.CONCLUSIONS: During transitions between sitting and standing the greatest potential for regeneration occurs in the hips. Therefore, systems designed to implement regenerative effects between sitting and standing need to include subsystems at the hip for maximum regenerative effects.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph Vacca

Value-sensitive design is an approach that seeks to explicitly center the values of design stakeholders. In doing so, the method provides a rich analytical backdrop in which to explore how participants make sense of values and embody values in their designs. In this study, I explore the broad question of how a value-sensitive design approach can be used to surface, address, and possibly reconcile the similar and different culturally informed ways we make sense of being feminist fathers. Two groups of self-proclaimed feminist fathers, white non-Latinx and nonwhite Latinx, engaged in a value-sensitive design approach to designing technology to support their conceptualizations of feminist fatherhood. Four themes around differences between the groups and the kinds of reflections the participants engaged in are summarized. Based on our findings, I contribute suggestions for adapting value-sensitive design approaches to scaffold certain kinds of reflection around authenticity and interpretation in ways that are more grounded in themes of nondominance.


2020 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 219-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucia Gazzaneo ◽  
Antonio Padovano ◽  
Steven Umbrello

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Umbrello

This paper argues that the Value Sensitive Design (VSD) methodology provides a principled approach to embedding common values into AI systems both early and throughout the design process. To do so, it draws on an important case study: the evidence and final report of the UK Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence. This empirical investigation shows that the different and often disparate stakeholder groups that are implicated in AI design and use share some common values that can be used to further strengthen design coordination efforts. VSD is shown to be both able to distill these common values as well as provide a framework for stakeholder coordination.


Author(s):  
Majid Dadgar ◽  
K. D. Joshi

This chapter advocates the use of a value-sensitive design (VSD) approach toward deriving patient intelligence by illustrating that the insights provided by the healthcare data that captures patients' concerns, needs, and desires—known as values—provide more sustainable care. Authors examine three cases extracted from top information systems (IS) peer-reviewed journals in which medical data is collected and analyzed and in which intelligence is derived through a VSD framework. VSD is a three-part methodology that comprises conceptual, empirical, and technical investigations. This chapter investigates the value sensitivity of the following key activities and tasks that result in intelligence from data: data collection, data analysis, and data reporting.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cara Wrigley ◽  
Harjit Rana ◽  
Peta Hinton ◽  
Genevieve Mosely

With rapid advancements in technology radically impacting and changing current ways of working globally, many industries and sectors, including the Defence force, are implementing new approaches to respond to and address these challenges. Design thinking is one approach to assist in this response, as it provides a novel process for solving complex problems. This article presents a specific design approach for addressing contextual Defence problems in the form of a design thinking framework based on a review of the existing literature concerning design and Defence. The article contends with the role of design as a value-added methodology in Defence strategy and development, and it reports on a unique set of design thinking capabilities for a Defence-specific context that are not only essential for the implementation of a design-led approach to innovation but are of great assistance in overcoming its associated challenges. The Defence by Design framework works with an identified military objective that, when applied, overcomes the natural bias that Defence personnel may exhibit during routine gaps and opportunities analysis. By detailing the different stages of the framework, and demonstrating their iterative nature, through the documentation of a working example – ‘Man Overboard’ – this article presents a new approach yet to be realized in Defence globally.


Author(s):  
Abdullah A. Desai ◽  
Lavanan Vengadasalam ◽  
Peter M. Hollingsworth ◽  
Phani Chinchapatnam
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document