Modern Tree Plantation System Based on IoT

Author(s):  
Muskan Hossain Bithi ◽  
Fahad Faisal ◽  
Asif Karim ◽  
Sami Azam ◽  
Bharanidharan Shanmugam ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Boadi ◽  
Mark Baah-Acheamfour ◽  
Francis Ulzen-Appiah ◽  
Ghulam Murtaza Jamro

Thaumatococcus danielliiis a wild sourced tropical understorey herb that is harvested for its foliage and fruits from which thaumatin—a proteinous sweetener—is extracted. With increased demand for natural sweeteners, uncontrolled harvesting ofT. danielliifrom the wild is suggested to be neither sustainable nor match industrial demands. This study determined the implication of controlled foliage harvesting ofT. danielliiunder a mixed indigenous tree plantation stand.T. danielliiplants within plots of dimension 3 m × 4 m were thinned to uniform foliage population of about 12 leaves/m2and subsequently harvested at 16 weeks interval for 64 weeks at four different foliage harvesting intensities: (i) no harvesting (control), (ii) 25% harvest, (iii) 50% harvest, and (iv) 75% harvest. Data on agronomic characters and total income from the sale of fruit and harvested foliage were collected and analysed. We found that foliage harvest intensity affected(P<0.001)number of flowers in the order: 18 (control) > 6 (25%) ≥ 1 (50%) and 0 (75%). Foliage harvest intensity also significantly(P=0.036)influenced fruit number and ranged from 11458/ha for the control to 4583/ha for the 75% harvest. Total income from fruit and foliage sales was greatest for the 50% harvest (US $ 17,191.32), followed by 75% harvest (US $ 12, 310.24) and lowest for the no harvest treatment (US $ 107.44). Thus, proper management ofT. danielliithrough controlled harvesting of the foliage under mixed tree plantation system could promote sustainable yield and income to farmers.


2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 495-520
Author(s):  
Padraic X. Scanlan

AbstractFrom the middle of the eighteenth century until the late 1830s, the idea of enslaved people as “peasants” was a commonplace among both antislavery and proslavery writers and activists in Britain. Slaveholders, faced with antislavery attacks, argued that the people they claimed to own were not an exploited labor force but a contented peasantry. Abolitionists expressed the hope that after emancipation, freedpeople would become peasants. Yet the “peasants” invoked in these debates were not smallholders or tenant farmers but plantation laborers, either held in bondage or paid low wages. British abolitionists promoted institutions and ideas invented by slaveholders to defend the plantation system. The idea of a servile and grateful “peasant” plantation labor force became, for British abolitionists, a justification for the “civilization” and subordination of freedpeople.


Mycorrhiza ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 863-877 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laetitia Herrmann ◽  
Didier Lesueur ◽  
Lambert Bräu ◽  
John Davison ◽  
Teele Jairus ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document