A Study of Influence Factors Affecting to Surface Roughness in Stainless Steel Turning

Author(s):  
Sittichai Kaewkuekool ◽  
Komson Jirapattarasilp ◽  
Kampol Pechkong
Materials ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grzegorz Struzikiewicz ◽  
Wojciech Zębala ◽  
Andrzej Matras ◽  
Magdalena Machno ◽  
Łukasz Ślusarczyk ◽  
...  

This paper presents the characteristic of 316L steel turning obtained by 3D printing. The analysis of the influence of turning data on the components of the total cutting force, surface roughness and the maximum temperature values in the cutting zone are presented. The form of chips obtained in the machining process was also analyzed. Statistical analysis of the test results was developed using the Taguchi method.


2010 ◽  
Vol 148-149 ◽  
pp. 130-135
Author(s):  
Chun Qiang Yang ◽  
Yun Huang ◽  
Zhi Huang ◽  
Xiao Zhen Li

Blades are the key parts of turbines. The materials used for making blades have many excellent performances such as high intensity, corrosion resistant and temperature resistant. They are of hard to machine materials. However, there is little information available in the literature related to abrasive belt grinding blades materials. And its mechanisms have not yet been fully explained. This paper aims to make a contribution to the understanding of the wear mechanisms of the abrasive belt and its influence factors. A series of tests were conducted on 1Cr13 stainless steel. The surface roughness and the surface topography of abrasive wear were observed. The influences of grinding force and grinding time on surface roughness were discussed. The wear mechanisms are revealed based on the model of abrasive grain’s wear. It revealed that existence of an optimum surface roughness reachable dependent of the grinding force and grinding time. It has also been shown that the type of abrasive and grinding depth have great influence on abrasive wear.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (11A) ◽  
pp. 1593-1601
Author(s):  
Mohammed H. Shaker ◽  
Salah K. Jawad ◽  
Maan A. Tawfiq

This research studied the influence of cutting fluids and cutting parameters on the surface roughness for stainless steel worked by turning machine in dry and wet cutting cases. The work was done with different cutting speeds, and feed rates with a fixed depth of cutting. During the machining process, heat was generated and effects of higher surface roughness of work material. In this study, the effects of some cutting fluids, and dry cutting on surface roughness have been examined in turning of AISI316 stainless steel material. Sodium Lauryl Ether Sulfate (SLES) instead of other soluble oils has been used and compared to dry machining processes. Experiments have been performed at four cutting speeds (60, 95, 155, 240) m/min, feed rates (0.065, 0.08, 0.096, 0.114) mm/rev. and constant depth of cut (0.5) mm. The amount of decrease in Ra after the used suggested mixture arrived at (0.21µm), while Ra exceeded (1µm) in case of soluble oils This means the suggested mixture gave the best results of lubricating properties than other cases.


2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 411-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuxia Zhou ◽  
Christian Schöneich ◽  
Satish K. Singh

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 1376
Author(s):  
Alex Quok An Teo ◽  
Lina Yan ◽  
Akshay Chaudhari ◽  
Gavin Kane O’Neill

Additive manufacturing of stainless steel is becoming increasingly accessible, allowing for the customisation of structure and surface characteristics; there is little guidance for the post-processing of these metals. We carried out this study to ascertain the effects of various combinations of post-processing methods on the surface of an additively manufactured stainless steel 316L lattice. We also characterized the nature of residual surface particles found after these processes via energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Finally, we measured the surface roughness of the post-processing lattices via digital microscopy. The native lattices had a predictably high surface roughness from partially molten particles. Sandblasting effectively removed this but damaged the surface, introducing a peel-off layer, as well as leaving surface residue from the glass beads used. The addition of either abrasive polishing or electropolishing removed the peel-off layer but introduced other surface deficiencies making it more susceptible to corrosion. Finally, when electropolishing was performed after the above processes, there was a significant reduction in residual surface particles. The constitution of the particulate debris as well as the lattice surface roughness following each post-processing method varied, with potential implications for clinical use. The work provides a good base for future development of post-processing methods for additively manufactured stainless steel.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document