How do employees inspire innovative work behavior? transformational leadership and work motivation perspectives

Author(s):  
Jen-Chia Chang ◽  
Chia-Ying Lee ◽  
Pai-Yen Wei ◽  
Wei-Cheng Huang
2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emil Knezović ◽  
Amina Drkić

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the determinants of innovative work behavior (IWB) by examining the moderating role of transformational leadership in the context of small and medium enterprises (SMEs).Design/methodology/approachThe study surveyed 371 employees from SMEs in Bosnia and Herzegovina by adopting convenience sampling. Hierarchical regression was used to test the hypotheses.FindingsThe findings supported the authors’ assumptions that IWB determinants such as psychological empowerment, participation in the decision-making process and organizational justice are positively related to IWB. Besides, transformational leadership moderates the relationship between organizational justice and IWB.Research limitations/implicationsThe data for this study was collected by using convenience sampling as well as a cross-sectional survey method, which limits the generalization of results.Practical implicationsTo spur the IWB among the employees in SMEs, an organization has to create an environment where psychological empowerment is high, employees have a chance to participate in the decision-making process and organizational rules and procedures are fair. In the case of organizational justice, the relationship shall be stronger if transformational leadership is present.Originality/valueIn SMEs, transformational leadership plays an important role. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first study that demonstrates the moderating effect of transformational leadership on the relationship between one specific IWB determinant and IWB.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 925-938 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arif Md. Khan ◽  
Amer Hamzah Bin Jantan ◽  
Lailawati Binti Mohd Salleh ◽  
Zuraina Dato’ Mansor ◽  
Md Asadul Islam ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1267-1276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing Zhang ◽  
Abdul Rashid Abdullah ◽  
Dalowar Hossan ◽  
Zongxiang Hou

The current study examined the effect of the style of transformational leadership on innovative work behavior as well as the internal locus of control’s moderating role and psychological empowerment between the relationships of them. We collected data from 422 respondents who are related to family business in Malaysia. Path coefficient analysis was employed to test the hypotheses and SPSS software was used for analyzing descriptive data. The results showed that transformational leadership style, psychological empowerment and internal locus of control have affirmative relationship and significant impact on innovative work behavior. Finally, psychological empowerment and internal locus of control were not found to have moderating effect between innovative work behavior and the style of transformational leadership.


Author(s):  
Minwir M Al-Shammari ◽  
Noof Y Khalifa

The purpose of this study is to provide an understanding of the role that transformational leadership plays in innovative work behavior of employees in an IT department of a public organization in Bahrain. An online questionnaire hyperlink was sent to 127 randomly chosen employees. The completed and submitted questionnaires were 98, at a response rate of 77%. Results of the Spearman rank correlation tests indicated that there were significant relationships between transformational factors and employees' innovative behavior, except for the idealized influence factor that showed no significant relationships. Furthermore, the study found significant relationships between innovative behaviors and employee demographic variables (gender and academic qualification). Managers need to react positively to the innovative efforts of employees and provide them with resources and rewards needed for innovation.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 154-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rutchapong Chatchawan ◽  
Kanon Trichandhara ◽  
Idsaratt Rinthaisong

This study aimed to develop a conceptual framework of factors affecting innovative work behavior of employeers in local administrative organizations. The study was conducted through a review of literature and document analysis. The results were presented in a form of descriptive analysis. The results show that team climate inventory, learning orientation, organizational supoortiveness, and transformational leadership play a direct role in developing innovative work behavior. Meanwhile, organizational supportiveness indirectly affects team climate inventry and transformational leadership indirectly affects learning orientation. Int. J. Soc. Sc. Manage. Vol. 4, Issue-3: 154-157


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Namra Mubarak ◽  
Jabran Khan ◽  
Robina Yasmin ◽  
Atasya Osmadi

PurposeThrough the lens of social exchange theory, this study aims to assess the relationship between proactive personality and innovative work behavior by incorporating the mediating role of work engagement and moderating role of transformational leadership between proactive personality and work engagement.Design/methodology/approachData were collected from 259 employees working in Pakistani small-medium enterprises (SMEs). The purposive sampling technique was used to collect data. For hypothesis testing, Preacher and Hayes process macro was employed.FindingsConfirmatory factor analysis verified the distinctiveness of the variables used in this study. The findings show that a proactive personality had a positive influence on innovative work behavior directly and indirectly through work engagement, and transformational leadership positively moderates the relationship between a proactive personality and work engagement in such a way that with high transformational leadership behavior relationship will be strengthened.Originality/valueThis study has addressed three research questions that have been left unanswered in the literature. The initial research question is “how proactive personality enhances innovative work behavior?” This study found that proactive personality enhanced innovative work behavior. The second research question is “what are the suggested mechanisms for proactive personality to promote innovative work behavior?” This study has proven that a proactive personality enhanced innovative work behavior through an important mediating mechanism, namely work engagement. Finally, the third question of the study is “does transformational leadership moderate the relationship between proactive personality and work engagement? The study shows that transformational leadership positively moderates between proactive personality and work engagement.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahadi Prabowo ◽  
Martina Dwi Mustika ◽  
Bertina Sjabadhyni

Businesses, especially those in urban areas, rely on innovation as the crucible of growth. Businesses must adapt to current and future conditions of their markets, consumers, and the demands of globalization. Therefore, innovation is central to a business’ success. We argue that psychological empowerment indirectly influences the relationship between transformational leadership and innovative work behavior. A transformational leader spurs their employees’ capability and efficacy. As a result, employees feel valued by the company, which encourages them to be innovative in the workplace. Thus, the employee can be innovative, without fearing the reprimand of superiors. This research surveyed 292 employees from different organization types (e.g., private sector, public sector, and nongovernmental organizations) in urban areas. The results of the study’s mediation analysis demonstrate that innovative work behavior is the outcome of the psychological empowerment from transformational leadership. Therefore, we argue that a transformational leader tends to empower their employees psychologically, which may improve employees’ ability to be more innovative at work. There are some limitations of this research (e.g., research design, adaptation of measuring instruments, and statistical remedies that have not been optimally implemented). The researchers provide suggestions regarding countermeasures for common method bias, which are outlined in the Discussion section.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document