Snow Grain Size Estimates from Airborne Ka-Band Radar Measurements

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Li ◽  
B. Camps-Raga ◽  
F. Rodriguez-Morales ◽  
D. Gomez-Garcia ◽  
J. Paden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Grain Size ◽  
Ka Band ◽  
Radar Measurements ◽  
Size Estimates

scholarly journals Comparison of the cloud top heights retrieved from MODIS and AHI satellite data with ground-based Ka-band radar

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Huo ◽  
Daren Lu ◽  
Shu Duan ◽  
Yongheng Bi ◽  
Bo Liu
Keyword(s):  
Satellite Data ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Retrieval Algorithm ◽  
Ka Band ◽  
Retrieval Accuracy ◽  
Retrieval Algorithms ◽  
Moderate Resolution ◽  
Resolution Imaging ◽  
Radar Measurements ◽  
Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer

Abstract. To better understand the accuracy of cloud top heights (CTHs) derived from passive satellite data, ground-based Ka-band radar measurements from 2016 and 2017 in Beijing were compared with CTH data inferred from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and the Advanced Himawari Imager (AHI). Relative to the radar CTHs, the MODIS CTHs were found to be underestimated by −1.10 ± 2.53 km and 49 % of CTH differences were within 1.0 km. Like the MODIS results, the AHI CTHs were underestimated by −1.10 ± 2.27 km and 42 % were within 1.0 km. Both the MODIS and AHI retrieval accuracy depended strongly on the cloud depth (CD). Large differences were mainly occurring for the retrieval of thin clouds of CD  1 km, the CTH difference decreased to −0.48 ± 1.70 km for MODIS and to −0.76 ± 1.63 km for AHI. MODIS CTHs greater than 6 km showed better agreement with the radar data than those less than 4 km. Statistical analysis showed that the average AHI CTHs were lower than the average MODIS CTHs by −0.64 ± 2.36 km. The monthly accuracy of both retrieval algorithms was studied and it was found that the AHI retrieval algorithm had the largest bias in winter while the MODIS retrieval algorithm had the lowest accuracy in spring.

scholarly journals Airborne Radar Observations of Severe Hailstorms: Implications for Future Spaceborne Radar

2013 ◽  
Vol 52 (8) ◽  
pp. 1851-1867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald M. Heymsfield ◽  
Lin Tian ◽  
Lihua Li ◽  
Matthew McLinden ◽  
Jaime I. Cervantes
Keyword(s):  
High Altitude ◽  
Doppler Radar ◽  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Airborne Radar ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Precipitation Radar ◽  
Ka Band ◽  
Severe Thunderstorms ◽  
Radar Measurements ◽  
Spaceborne Radar

AbstractA new dual-frequency (Ku and Ka band) nadir-pointing Doppler radar on the high-altitude NASA ER-2 aircraft, called the High-Altitude Imaging Wind and Rain Airborne Profiler (HIWRAP), has collected data over severe thunderstorms in Oklahoma and Kansas during the Midlatitude Continental Convective Clouds Experiment (MC3E). The overarching motivation for this study is to understand the behavior of the dual-wavelength airborne radar measurements in a global variety of thunderstorms and how these may relate to future spaceborne-radar measurements. HIWRAP is operated at frequencies that are similar to those of the precipitation radar on the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (Ku band) and the upcoming Global Precipitation Measurement mission satellite's dual-frequency (Ku and Ka bands) precipitation radar. The aircraft measurements of strong hailstorms have been combined with ground-based polarimetric measurements to obtain a better understanding of the response of the Ku- and Ka-band radar to the vertical distribution of the hydrometeors, including hail. Data from two flight lines on 24 May 2011 are presented. Doppler velocities were ~39 m s−1 at 10.7-km altitude from the first flight line early on 24 May, and the lower value of ~25 m s−1 on a second flight line later in the day. Vertical motions estimated using a fall speed estimate for large graupel and hail suggested that the first storm had an updraft that possibly exceeded 60 m s−1 for the more intense part of the storm. This large updraft speed along with reports of 5-cm hail at the surface, reflectivities reaching 70 dBZ at S band in the storm cores, and hail signals from polarimetric data provide a highly challenging situation for spaceborne-radar measurements in intense convective systems. The Ku- and Ka-band reflectivities rarely exceed ~47 and ~37 dBZ, respectively, in these storms.

scholarly journals Ka-Band Radar Cross-Section of Breaking Wind Waves

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 1929
Author(s):  
Yury Yu. Yurovsky ◽  
Vladimir N. Kudryavtsev ◽  
Semyon A. Grodsky ◽  
Bertrand Chapron
Keyword(s):  
Cross Section ◽  
Wind Waves ◽  
Radar Cross Section ◽  
Breaking Waves ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
Breaking Wave ◽  
Geometric Optics ◽  
Ka Band ◽  
Radar Measurements ◽  
Crest Length

The effective normalized radar cross section (NRCS) of breaking waves, σwb, is empirically derived based on joint synchronized Ka-band radar and video records of the sea surface from a research tower. The σwb is a key parameter that, along with the breaker footprint fraction, Q, defines the contribution of non-polarized backscattering, NP =σwbQ, to the total sea surface NRCS. Combined with the right representation of the regular Bragg and specular backscattering components, the NP component is fundamental to model and interpret sea surface radar measurements. As the first step, the difference between NRCS values for breaking and non-breaking conditions is scaled with the optically-observed Q and compared with the geometric optics model of breaker backscattering. Optically-derived Q might not be optimal to represent the effect of breaking waves on the radar measurements. Alternatively, we rely on the breaking crest length that is firmly detected by the video technique and the empirically estimated breaker decay (inverse wavelength) scale in the direction of breaking wave propagation. A simplified model of breaker NRCS is then proposed using the geometric optics approach. This semi-analytical model parameterizes the along-wave breaker decay from reported breaker roughness spectra, obtained in laboratory experiments with mechanically-generated breakers. These proposed empirical breaker NRCS estimates agree satisfactorily with observations.

scholarly journals Comparison of the cloud top heights retrieved from MODIS and AHI satellite data with ground-based Ka-band radar

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Huo ◽  
Daren Lu ◽  
Shu Duan ◽  
Yongheng Bi ◽  
Bo Liu
Keyword(s):  
Satellite Data ◽  
Cloud Base ◽  
Ka Band ◽  
Retrieval Accuracy ◽  
Moderate Resolution ◽  
Resolution Imaging ◽  
Radar Measurements ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer ◽  
The Difference

Abstract. To better understand the accuracy of cloud top heights (CTHs) derived from passive satellite data, ground-based Ka-band radar measurements from 2016 and 2017 in Beijing are compared with CTH data inferred from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and the Advanced Himawari Imager (AHI). Relative to the radar CTHs, the MODIS CTHs are found to be underestimated by−1.10 ± 2.53 km on average and 49 % of CTH differences are within 1.0 km. The AHI CTHs are underestimated by −1.10 ± 2.27 km and 42 % are within 1.0 km. Both the MODIS and AHI CTH retrieval accuracy depends strongly on the cloud depth (CD). Large differences are mainly due to the retrieval of thin clouds of CD <1 km, especially when the cloud base height is higher than 4 km. For clouds with CD >1 km, the mean CTH difference decreases to -0.48±1.70 km for MODIS and to -0.76±1.63 km for AHI. It is found that MODIS CTHs with higher values (i.e. >6 km) show smaller discrepancy with radar CTH than those MODIS CTHs with lower values (i.e. <4 km). Statistical analysis illustrate that the CTH difference between the two satellite instruments is lower than the difference between the satellite instrument and the ground-based Ka-band radar. The monthly accuracy of both CTH retrieval algorithms is investigated and it is found that summer has the smallest retrieval difference.

Estimation of Layer-Averaged Rain Rate From Zenith Pointing Ka-Band Radar Measurements Using Attenuation Method

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 3178-3183
Author(s):  
Subrata Kumar Das ◽  
Yogesh Kisan Kolte ◽  
Uriya Veerendra Murali Krishna ◽  
Sachin Madhukar Deshpande ◽  
Abhishek Kumar Jha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rain Rate ◽  
Ka Band ◽  
Radar Measurements
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document