Effect of artificial aquifer recharge on hydraulic conductivity using single injection well

Author(s):  
Yanhui Dong ◽  
Pinge Zhao ◽  
Weibo Zhou
Author(s):  
Nishi Verma ◽  
Martin Anda ◽  
Yureana Wijayanti

<strong>Aim: </strong>This study investigates the development of a sustainable groundwater management strategy in Yogyakarta province through groundwater recharge technologies. This study also compares technologies used in the province and the one already implemented in Perth due to its similar nature in site geology and hydrogeology. <strong>Methodology and Results: </strong>Primary and secondary data were collected and analyzed. Water depth and hydraulic conductivity data were analyzed using permeameter and GIS program. GIS image analysis of water depth and hydraulic conductivity suggested that the placement of potential aquifer recharge sites would be best suited in the north-east part of the province, slightly outside the study area, to provide water for all. Two recharge schemes of an infiltration basin and an injection well with storm water detention tank were proposed. The injection well was decided upon, despite its higher cost, due to the impermeability of soils in Yogyakarta and possible water seepage to the environment. Similar to Perth’s Hartfield park scheme, an injection well would directly bypass these soil layers to recharge the aquifers with rainwater and storm water. Hartfield Park injects 4400 kL of water/year. <strong>Conclusion, significance and impact study: </strong>The findings of this study indicate aquifer recharge is a possible solution to overcome Yogyakarta’s high abstraction. Further studies recommend that injection well trials are further developed in terms of location, depth and sizing.


2013 ◽  
Vol 146 ◽  
pp. 8-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Lewis ◽  
Jan Burman ◽  
Christina Edlund ◽  
Louise Simonsson ◽  
Rune Berglind ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 40-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Azaroual ◽  
M. Pettenati ◽  
P. Ollivier ◽  
K. Besnard ◽  
J. Casanova ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger Clavera-Gispert ◽  
Aaron Micallef

&lt;p&gt;Groundwater has been implicated as an important geomorphic agent in landscape evolution. The link between groundwater seepage and landscape evolution remains controversial and poorly quantified, however. Groundwater weathering and erosion processes have not been quantified in terms of mechanisms, rates or resulting morphologies. Experimental and numerical analyses of these processes have been based on simplistic assumptions about flow processes and hydraulic characteristics. There is also a paucity of process-based observations and detailed instrumental studies of seepage erosion and weathering due to the long timescales involved and the complexity of the process. Numerical modelling, in particular Landscape Evolution Modelling (LEM), is a valuable tool that can allow us to better understand the spatial and temporal evolution of landscapes by groundwater seepage, particularly when integrated with field data.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here we report preliminary results from a study focusing on the Canterbury coast of the South Island, New Zealand. The study area, located between the Ashburton and Rakaia Rivers, comprises a 20 m high coastal cliff of sandy gravels with isolated sand bodies that features a series of box canyons. Field visits carried out in 2017 and 2019 allowed us to characterise the geological framework of the area and monitor the formation and evolution of box canyons by groundwater seepage. We used Landlab, an open source framework written in python, to build a LEM for the study area.&amp;#160; The code includes a simplified groundwater model using the Dupuit approximation, the calculation of the drainage area, as well as erosion processes using diffusion and a power law functions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The model computes the evolution of the coastal landscape during 1 year. The initial topography is obtained from a 1x1m DEM and the initial conditions are derived from the fieldwork. Several examples have been run using different aquifer recharge rates and hydraulic conductivity. The results suggest that the factor that controls the inception erosion is the spatial variability in permeability and initial topography, whereas the evolution of the canyon is controlled by the seepage flow, which depends on the hydraulic conductivity and the erosivity of the sediments.&lt;/p&gt;


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 100274
Author(s):  
César Augusto Moreira ◽  
Vania Rosolen ◽  
Lucas Moreira Furlan ◽  
Renata Cristina Bovi ◽  
Henri Masquelin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document