scholarly journals Influence of 2D and 3D meshes in FE computation of eddy-current losses in surface PMSMs

Author(s):  
Yves Mollet ◽  
Johan Gyselinck ◽  
Ruth V. Sabariego
2010 ◽  
Vol 670 ◽  
pp. 477-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Hernández ◽  
J.M. Cañedo ◽  
J.C. Olivares-Galván ◽  
Pavlos S. Georgilakis

This paper presents comparative results of an electromagnetic study performed in two different wound core transformer configurations in order to know the best configuration that reduce excitation current and core losses. The results show that octagonal wound-core (OWC) reduces the excitation current and eddy-current losses with respect conventional-wound core (CWC). The results were obtained applying 2D and 3D FEM simulations, taking into account the non-linear properties of the core. In the last part of this paper, several grades of grain oriented electrical steels and the combination of them are analyzed to find the best mixing percentage to reduce eddy-current losses and excitation current.


2011 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 215-222
Author(s):  
Damian Mazur ◽  
Marek Gołębiowski

Calculating the main and leakage inductance matrix of the 3-column 15-winding autotransformer The aim of this paper is presentation and comparison of calculation methods of the inductance matrix of a 3-column multi-winding autotransformer. Main and leakage autotransformer inductance was obtained using finite elements method. Static calculations were made at the current supply for 2D and 3D models, and mono-harmonic calculations were made at the voltage supply. In the mono-harmonic calculations the eddy current losses were taken into account, this made it possible to study relationship between the autotransformer parameters and the frequency. Calculations were made using Ansys and the authors' own programs in Matlab.


2020 ◽  
pp. 54-58
Author(s):  
S. M. Plotnikov

The division of the total core losses in the electrical steel of the magnetic circuit into two components – losses dueto hysteresis and eddy currents – is a serious technical problem, the solution of which will effectively design and construct electrical machines with magnetic circuits having low magnetic losses. In this regard, an important parameter is the exponent α, with which the frequency of magnetization reversal is included in the total losses in steel. Theoretically, this indicator can take values from 1 to 2. Most authors take α equal to 1.3, which corresponds to the special case when the eddy current losses are three times higher than the hysteresis losses. In fact, for modern electrical steels, the opposite is true. To refine the index α, an attempt was made to separate the total core losses on the basis that the hysteresis component is proportional to the first degree of the magnetization reversal frequency, and the eddy current component is proportional to the second degree. In the article, the calculation formulas of these components are obtained, containing the values of the total losses measured in idling experiments at two different frequencies, and the ratio of these frequencies. It is shown that the rational frequency ratio is within 1.2. Presented the graphs and expressions to determine the exponent α depending on the measured no-load losses and the frequency of magnetization reversal.


1997 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 3085-3089
Author(s):  
S. Mench ◽  
M. Lelovic ◽  
T. Deis ◽  
N. G. Eror ◽  
U. Balachandran ◽  
...  

The ac magnetic losses at power frequencies (60 Hz) were investigated for mono- and multifilament Ag-sheathed (Bi, Pb)2Sr2Ca2Cu3Oy (BSCCO-2223) tapes with similar Ic values at 77 K. The multifilament sample exhibited higher losses than the monofilament under the same conditions. Loss peaks are discussed in terms of intergranular, intragranular, and eddy current losses. Because of BSCCO's anisotropy, field orientation has a large effect on the magnitude of these peaks, even at relatively small angles. Losses for fields applied parallel to the c-axis of the textured BSCCO grains are larger by over an order of magnitude than those applied perpendicular.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lino Di Leonardo ◽  
Andrea Credo ◽  
Marco Tursini ◽  
Marco Villani

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document