Single-Phase Transformer Active and Reactive Power Distribution with the Inter-tum Fault Conditions and the Eddy Currents Increase.

Author(s):  
Ihor Reva ◽  
Olexii Bialobrzheskyi ◽  
Andrii Lomonos
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosa Iris Viera-Diaz ◽  
Mario Gonzalez-Garcia ◽  
Ricardo Alvarez-Salas ◽  
Homero Miranda ◽  
Yuniel Leon-Ruiz

Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (24) ◽  
pp. 4796 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eyad Radwan ◽  
Mutasim Nour ◽  
Emad Awada ◽  
Ali Baniyounes

This paper presents a control scheme for a photovoltaic (PV) system that uses a single-phase grid-connected inverter with low-voltage ride-through (LVRT) capability. In this scheme, two PI regulators are used to adjust the power angle and voltage modulation index of the inverter; therefore, controlling the inverter’s active and reactive output power, respectively. A fuzzy logic controller (FLC) is also implemented to manage the inverter’s operation during the LVRT operation. The FLC adjusts (or de-rates) the inverter’s reference active and reactive power commands based on the grid voltage sag and the power available from the PV system. Therefore, the inverter operation has been divided into two modes: (i) Maximum power point tracking (MPPT) during the normal operating conditions of the grid, and (ii) LVRT support when the grid is operating under faulty conditions. In the LVRT mode, the de-rating of the inverter active output power allows for injection of some reactive power, hence providing voltage support to the grid and enhancing the utilization factor of the inverter’s capacity. The proposed system was modelled and simulated using MATLAB Simulink. The simulation results showed good system performance in response to changes in reference power command, and in adjusting the amount of active and reactive power injected into the grid.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingsong Wang ◽  
Panhong Chen ◽  
Fujin Deng ◽  
Ming Cheng ◽  
Giuseppe Buja

The concept of electric springs (ESs) has been proposed as a new solution for stabilizing power grid fed by intermittent renewable energy sources. With a battery or active power source (DC, on the inside), the ESs can provide both active and reactive power compensations. So far, three typical topologies of single-phase ESs have been reported. Unlike traditional devices where power generation follows the load demand, the ESs are associated with non-critical loads form the so-called smart loads that transfer the fluctuated power to the non-critical loads, adaptively, according to the intermittent nature of power generation. After reviewing the main control strategies of single-phase ESs, the paper analyzes their advantages and disadvantages as well as their suitable applications. Comparisons among different control strategies on a specific topology version are implemented. Finally, conclusions and possible future trends are pointed out.


2018 ◽  
Vol 65 (8) ◽  
pp. 6291-6300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingsong Wang ◽  
Ming Cheng ◽  
Yunlei Jiang ◽  
Wujian Zuo ◽  
Giuseppe Buja

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document