Stability evaluation method using phase response measurements

Author(s):  
Radu Belea ◽  
Silviu Epure
Symmetry ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 79
Author(s):  
Qiuwei Yang ◽  
Zhikun Ba ◽  
Zhuo Zhao ◽  
Xi Peng ◽  
Yun Sun

Blasting impact load may be encountered during the construction of some pile foundation projects. Due to the effect of blasting impact, hole collapse can easily occur in the hole-forming stage of pile foundation construction. In order to prevent hole collapse, it is very necessary to evaluate the stability of a pile hole wall before pile foundation construction. The calculation of hole collapse can usually be attributed to an axisymmetric circular hole stress concentration problem. However, the existing collapse failure theory of pile hole hardly considers the effect of blasting impact load. In view of this, this paper proposes the stability evaluation method of a pile hole wall under blasting impact. Compared with the existing collapse failure theory, the proposed method fully considers the effect of blasting impact stress. Using Mohr–Coulomb strength theory and symmetry analysis, the strength condition of collapse failure is established in this work for accurate evaluation of the stability of a hole wall. The proposed stability evaluation method is demonstrated by a pile foundation construction project of a bridge. Moreover, a shaking table test on the pile hole model was performed to verify the proposed method by experimental data. The results indicate the effectiveness and usability of the proposed method. The proposed method provides a feasible way for the stability analysis of a pile hole wall under blasting impact.


2021 ◽  
Vol 861 (5) ◽  
pp. 052035
Author(s):  
Weizhi Chen ◽  
Weijing Min ◽  
Yuchun Yao ◽  
Anhong Li ◽  
Yong Liu ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (22) ◽  
pp. 8245
Author(s):  
Kyuhwan Oh ◽  
Jaeik Lee ◽  
Junhyeok Choi ◽  
Yonggul Park

Countries such as Korea adopt design codes, evaluation criteria and specifications from standards originating abroad; this leads to a lack of distinction of the separate applications of dynamic stability evaluation parameters between various track structures of different track moduli. This paper discusses the applicability of the dynamic stability evaluation method of railway track structures by assessing 10 different types of railway track sections of a newly constructed railway operation line (5 ballasted and 5 concrete type track structures) by field instrumentation testing. Parameters of track support stiffness (TSS), wheel load fluctuation, derailment coefficient, and rail displacement are measured. The respective results are first compared to the standard criteria (design specification) and comparisons between the different track types are presented as ratios. Findings show that while all of the tracks satisfy the design specification requirements, each track type measurement result varies by a noticeable degree, particularly when comparing between concrete and ballast type track structures. Results of the study demonstrate that using the same dynamic stability evaluation criteria can lead to an incorrect assessment of the track performance evaluation of track structure, and a separate evaluation parameter for ballasted and concrete track structures is required.


2010 ◽  
Vol 174 (3) ◽  
pp. 18-24
Author(s):  
Takahiro Okuda ◽  
Shinichi Nakagawa ◽  
Yuta Ohsaki ◽  
Shinichi Iwamoto

2011 ◽  
Vol 308-310 ◽  
pp. 88-91
Author(s):  
Hong Bo Xu ◽  
Guo Hua Chen ◽  
Xin Hua Wang ◽  
Jun Liang

For the time varying of signals, empirical mode decomposition (EMD) is occupied to modulate signals; auto-regressive moving average (ARMA) of higher accuracy is used to establish model for the signal principal components; then parametric bi-cepstrum estimation is implemented and fault feature is extracted. The test results about gearbox of overhead traveling crane indicate: the feature quefrency can be obtained through method of EMD and ARMA model parametric bi-cepstrum estimation.It is a kind of effective fault diagnosis and stability evaluation method.


2018 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 155-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Meng ◽  
Shangchun Fan ◽  
Chi Wang ◽  
Huichao Shi ◽  
Xiaopeng Li

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document