Polarimetric-radar drop size evaluation for wind speed estimate based on Weber criterion

Author(s):  
Yuliya Averyanova ◽  
Felix Yanovsky ◽  
Olga Shcherbina ◽  
Ivan Ostroumov ◽  
Nataliia Kuzmenko ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 870-877
Author(s):  
Yuliya Averyanova ◽  
Anna Rudiakova ◽  
Felix Yanovsky

AbstractThis paper considers the ability of polarization measurements for microwave remote sensing of clouds and precipitation. The simulation of reflections from liquid hydrometeors with a multi-polarization radar system is presented. The mathematical expression of energy received by a radar antenna with arbitrary polarization is obtained. The simulation of the energy redistribution of the signal reflected from liquid hydrometeors assembled over the antennas of multi-polarimetric radar for different wind conditions and different drop-size distributions is obtained and analyzed. The simulation results demonstrate the possibility to register wind and wind-related phenomena by polarimetric radar. The results of the paper can also be used to exclude an impact of drop vibration or oscillation into the radar signal to eliminate errors and underestimation during parameter measurements. The approach to segregate the reflected signal magnitude variations due to the wind-related phenomena from other factors is discussed.


Atmosphere ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yonghua Zhang ◽  
Liping Liu ◽  
Shuoben Bi ◽  
Zhifang Wu ◽  
Ping Shen ◽  
...  

Typhoon rainstorms often cause disasters in southern China. Quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) with the use of polarimetric radar can improve the accuracy of precipitation estimation and enhance typhoon defense ability. On the basis of the observed drop size distribution (DSD) of raindrops, a comparison is conducted among the DSD parameters and the polarimetric radar observation retrieved from DSD in five typhoon and three squall line events that occurred in southern China from 2016 to 2017. A new piecewise fitting method (PFM) is used to develop the QPE estimators for landfall typhoons and squall lines. The performance of QPE is evaluated by two fitting methods for two precipitation types using DSD data collected. Findings indicate that the number concentration of raindrops in typhoon precipitation is large and the average diameter is small, while the raindrops in squall line rain have opposite characteristics. The differential reflectivity (ZDR) and specific differential phase (KDP) in these two precipitation types increase slowly with the reflectivity factor (ZH), whereas the two precipitation types have different ZDR and KDP in the same ZH. Thus, it is critical to fit the rainfall estimator for different precipitation types. Enhanced estimation can be obtained using the estimators for specific precipitation types, whether the estimators are derived from the conventional fitting method (CFM) or PFM, and the estimators fitted using the PFM can produce better results. The estimators for the developed polarimetric radar can be used in operational QPE and quantitative precipitation foresting, and they can improve disaster defense against typhoons and heavy rains.


2006 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 259-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward A. Brandes ◽  
Guifu Zhang ◽  
Juanzhen Sun

Abstract Polarimetric radar measurements are used to retrieve drop size distributions (DSD) in subtropical thunderstorms. Retrievals are made with the single-moment exponential drop size model of Marshall and Palmer driven by radar reflectivity measurements and with a two-parameter constrained-gamma drop size model that utilizes reflectivity and differential reflectivity. Results are compared with disdrometer observations. Retrievals with the constrained-gamma DSD model gave better representation of total drop concentration, liquid water content, and drop median volume diameter and better described their natural variability. The Marshall–Palmer DSD model, with a fixed intercept parameter, tended to underestimate the total drop concentration in storm cores and to overestimate significantly the concentration in stratiform regions. Rainwater contents in strong convection were underestimated by a factor of 2–3, and drop median volume diameters in stratiform rain were underestimated by 0.5 mm. To determine possible DSD model impacts on numerical forecasts, evaporation and accretion rates were computed using Kessler-type parameterizations. Rates based on the Marshall–Palmer DSD model were lower by a factor of 2–3 in strong convection and were higher by about a factor of 2 in stratiform rain than those based on the constrained-gamma model. The study demonstrates the potential of polarimetric radar measurements for improving the understanding of precipitation processes and microphysics parameterization in numerical forecast models.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jui Le Loh ◽  
Dong-In Lee ◽  
Mi-Young Kang ◽  
Cheol-Hwan You

Tools to identify and classify stratiform and convective rains at various times of the 12 days from June 2015 to March 2016 in Jincheon, Korea, were developed by using a Parsivel disdrometer and S-band polarimetric (S-POL) radar data. Stratiform and convective rains were identified using three different methods (vertical profile of reflectivity (VPR), the method proposed by Bringi et al. (BR03), and a combination of the two (BR03-VPR)) by using a Parsivel disdrometer for its applications to radar as a reference. BR03-VPR exhibits a better classification scheme than the VPR and BR03 methods. The rain types were compared using the drop size distribution (DSD) retrieved from polarimetric variables and reflectivity only. By using the DSD variables, a new convective/stratiform classification line of the log-normalized droplet number concentration ( log 10 N w ) − median volume diameter ( D 0 ) was derived for this area to classify the rainfall types using DSD variables retrieved from the polarimetric radar. For the radar variables, the method by Steiner et al. (SHY95) was found to be the best method, with 0.00% misclassification of the stratiform rains. For the convective rains, the DSD retrieval method performed better. However, for both stratiform and convective rains, the fuzzy method performed better than the SHY95 and DSD retrieval methods.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document