Analysis of Students’ Ratings of Teaching Quality to Understand the Role of Gender and Socio-Economic Diversity in Higher Education

2018 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 319-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anika Gupta ◽  
Deepak Garg ◽  
Parteek Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Teaching Quality ◽  
Economic Diversity ◽  
Diversity In Higher Education

scholarly journals Increasing Gender Diversity in Higher Education Leadership: The Role of Executive Search Firms

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simonetta Manfredi ◽  
Kate Clayton-Hathway ◽  
Emily Cousens
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Knowledge Exchange ◽  
Gender Diversity ◽  
Leadership Roles ◽  
The Public ◽  
Executive Search ◽  
Diversity In Higher Education ◽  
Recruitment And Selection ◽  
Search Firms

Women are under-represented in leadership roles in United Kingdom Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). Existing scholarship focuses on institutional barriers, which include cognitive bias and entrenched homosocial cultures, rather than external factors such as the use of executive search firms (ESFs) in recruitment and selection. Recent research indicates that the use of ESFs is increasing for senior HEI appointments. This analysis offers insights on these firms’ involvement from a gender equality perspective, based on the results from a study that used a ‘virtuous circle’ approach to research and knowledge exchange. The requirement for HEIs to pay ‘due regard’ to equality considerations under the Public Sector Equality Duty provides a framework for analysis. This paper provides new insights on the dynamics within recruitment processes when ESFs are involved and on how a legislative approach can leverage better equality outcomes.

scholarly journals Do Teachers’ Achievement Goals and Self-efficacy Beliefs Matter for Students’ Learning Experiences? Evidence from Two Studies on Perceived Teaching Quality and Emotional Experiences

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Daumiller ◽  
Stefan Janke ◽  
Julia Hein ◽  
Raven Rinas ◽  
Oliver Dickhäuser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Achievement Goals ◽  
Teacher Motivation ◽  
Learning Experiences ◽  
Teaching Quality ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Avoidance Goals ◽  
Teacher Motivations

Although teacher motivation is posited to matter for students’ learning experiences, this remains largely uninvestigated, particularly in higher education. In two studies, we analyzed the role of higher education teachers’ achievement goals and self-efficacy for students’ learning experi-ences. In Study 1 (k = 166 teachers, n = 2,106 students), we assessed teachers’ motivations at the semester start, and students’ course-specific perceptions of teaching quality (overall rating, learning) and emotions (joy, boredom) at the semester end. Latent multilevel modeling indicat-ed favorable associations for teachers’ self-efficacy, but not for their goals. In Study 2 (k = 96 teachers, n = 16,009 students), we assessed the same constructs and measured students’ learn-ing experiences weekly regarding 828 specific course sessions. Additionally, we included teach-ers’ session-specific motivations. Results replicated the effects of self-efficacy on the teacher-level and suggested that performance-approach and performance-avoidance goals primarily matter on the level of specific sessions. This affirms the relevance of teacher motivations and il-luminates the importance of their specificity.

scholarly journals Information literacy, diversity and the role of reflection in creating knowledge

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Vibjerg Hansen
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Information Literacy ◽  
Educational Environment ◽  
Pedagogical Tools ◽  
Theoretical Concepts ◽  
Creative Processes ◽  
Diversity In Higher Education ◽  
Literacy Standards

Diversity in higher education calls for process oriented information literacy (IL) practitioners rather than source oriented practitioners. They must be generalists because e.g. students with different backgrounds to a higher degree bring multi- and interdisciplinarity into the situation of creating knowledge and problem solving. It is a situation where counselling is about how to prioritise and combine the multidisciplinarity rather than knowing a subject in depth. The purposes of this workshop are: To facilitate answers to the challenges IL practitioners meet in their work in an educational environment characterized by diversity To go through a process from pedagogical reflection to practical ideas about teaching or counselling. The participants will be challenged on their pedagogical awareness, competencies and creativity and on their understanding of information literacy. The participants will not be given the answers, but in order to live up to the concept of a workshop, we must all work and participate in the exploration for answers. The workshop will be a mix of understandings of IL, investigations of diversity and creating knowledge, pedagogical tools, examples of teaching materials, theoretical concepts and creative processes. We will deal with the following questions: How does IL fit into the process of creating knowledge? How should we look at information literacy? As a defined set of skills, qualifications and competencies or as a readiness to handle certain intellectual or academic situations? Does diversity mean the end of information literacy standards?

Considering pollution in the higher education (HE) service ecosystem

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 767-782 ◽  
Author(s):  
Montserrat Díaz-Méndez ◽  
Michael Saren ◽  
Evert Gummesson
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Student Evaluation ◽  
Ecosystem Approach ◽  
Teaching Quality ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Teachers And Students ◽  
Service Ecosystem ◽  
Operant Resources

Purpose From a service ecosystem perspective, the purpose of this paper is to examine students’ evaluation surveys as a tool used by most higher education (HE) institutions worldwide to measure teaching quality with consequences for tenure and promotion. Design/methodology/approach This study is based on the service-dominant (S-D) logic and specifically on the service ecosystem approach. Through an in-depth literature review and analysis the authors explore the effect of student evaluation surveys on the value co-creation process, describe the role they play in the HE ecosystem and critically evaluate their efficacy. The research is based on empirical data from the literature and previous studies findings. Findings The literature review highlights the detrimental consequences of the use of students’ evaluation surveys for teachers and students and for the rest of actors of this service. The authors argue that institutions should embrace a service ecosystem perspective based on S-D logic. The authors highlight the role of institutions as moderators of the interactions between actors and, finally, the authors have introduced the concept of “service ecosystem pollution” which the authors define as the presence or introduction of disruptive elements in the service ecosystem adversely affecting the nature of value co-creation. Practical implications This study emphasizes the importance for HE institutions to embrace a service ecosystem approach so as to foster and preserve the value co-creation processes taking place within the interactions among the HE actors. Conclusions drawn from this paper suggest that HE institutions should focus on strategies such as investing in improving students’ and teachers’ operant resources rather than polluting the HE service ecosystem with the use of students’ evaluation surveys. Originality/value Hitherto there are no studies analyzing the tools HE institutions use to measure teaching quality from a service ecosystem perspective. The study is especially valuable due to the consequences and the use of these measures entails for teachers, students and society.

The Role of Technology in Improving Quality of Teaching in Higher Education

2016 ◽  
pp. 207-227
Author(s):  
Harriet Thindwa
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Teaching Quality ◽  
Learning Technologies ◽  
Quality Of Teaching ◽  
Institutions Of Higher Learning ◽  
E Learning ◽  
Teaching In Higher Education

Students are the future of any country. They are the leaders and entrepreneurs of tomorrow. If teaching quality is undermined, so is the country's overall education system, and therefore, so is a country's future. In this chapter, the role of technology in improving quality of teaching in higher education, which has been declining over the years internationally including in the US, is reviewed. Databases EBSCOhost and Academic Search Complete were employed in this review. Empirical studies have revealed that e-learning technologies such as Moodle improve teaching quality. Given the advancement in technology, institutions of higher learning the world over are challenged to embrace technology as a strategy to engage students and enhance learning.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document