scholarly journals Using Eye-Tracking Data to Predict Situation Awareness in Real Time During Takeover Transitions in Conditionally Automated Driving

Author(s):  
Feng Zhou ◽  
X. Jessie Yang ◽  
Joost C. F. de Winter
2013 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leah Roberts ◽  
Anna Siyanova-Chanturia

Second language (L2) researchers are becoming more interested in both L2 learners’ knowledge of the target language and how that knowledge is put to use during real-time language processing. Researchers are therefore beginning to see the importance of combining traditional L2 research methods with those that capture the moment-by-moment interpretation of the target language, such as eye-tracking. The major benefit of the eye-tracking method is that it can tap into real-time (or online) comprehension processes during the uninterrupted processing of the input, and thus, the data can be compared to those elicited by other, more metalinguistic tasks to offer a broader picture of language acquisition and processing. In this article, we present an overview of the eye-tracking technique and illustrate the method with L2 studies that show how eye-tracking data can be used to (a) investigate language-related topics and (b) inform key debates in the fields of L2 acquisition and L2 processing.


2021 ◽  
Vol 157 ◽  
pp. 106143
Author(s):  
Nade Liang ◽  
Jing Yang ◽  
Denny Yu ◽  
Kwaku O. Prakah-Asante ◽  
Reates Curry ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sarah-Maria Castritius ◽  
Patric Schubert ◽  
Christoph Dietz ◽  
Heiko Hecht ◽  
Lynn Huestegge ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Mertzen ◽  
Anna Laurinavichyute ◽  
Brian Dillon ◽  
Ralf Engbert ◽  
Shravan Vasishth

Cue-based parsing theories posit that dependency resolution during real-time sentence comprehension relies on cue-based retrieval of linguistic items encoded in memory. This retrieval mechanism is prone to similarity-based interference, which can occur when there are items in memory that are similar to the retrieval target. Interference during sentence comprehension seems to be well-established across numerous syntactic dependencies; however, the evidence for interference on within-sentence dependencies from sentence-external lexical items (encoded in memory prior to reading a target dependency) is inconclusive (Van Dyke &McElree, 2006; Van Dyke et al., 2014). The goal of the present study is to provide a large-scale cross-linguistic investigation of retrieval interference from sentence-external distractors under varying processing demands. Three larger-sample eye-tracking studies in English (N=66),German (N=122) and Russian (N=109) show no support for similarity-based interference from sentence-external material during sentence comprehension. We discuss the implications of our findings for cue-based parsing theories.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-12
Author(s):  
Ana Paz Goncalves Martins ◽  
Steffen Hölscher ◽  
Thomas Dautermann

Abstract. Head-up displays (HUD) assist pilots, especially in the approach and landing phase. In this paper we compared pilots’ eye-tracking behavior between a pathway-in-the-sky layout versus the more conventional two-dimensional symbology in an HUD in a fixed-based cockpit simulator. In particular, we wanted to assess how visual attention was distributed within each layout (tunnel and standard). Performance and eye-tracking data were recorded, as well as workload and situation awareness measures. Results showed that the tunnel-in-the-sky symbology provided a very high tracking performance with low perceived workload and high perceived situational awareness. The analysis of the eye-tracking data revealed possible attentional tunneling with the tunnel-in-the-sky symbology and large differences between the displays in the distribution of visual attention.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document