Evolution of the Genetic Regulatory Networks: The Example of the Cell Cycle Control Network From Gastrulation Modelling to Apocatagenesis

Author(s):  
Flavien Caraguel ◽  
Muhammad Tayyab ◽  
Françoise Giroud ◽  
Jacques Demongeot
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii19-ii20
Author(s):  
Norihiko Saito ◽  
Sho Sato ◽  
Yu Hiramoto ◽  
Satoshi Fujita ◽  
Haruo Nakayama ◽  
...  

Abstract Oligodendrocyte lineage transcription factor 2 (OLIG2) promotes proliferation of normal neural stem/progenitor cells and glioma cells. However, the mechanisms underlying the regulation of OLIG2 remain largely unknown. Here, we show that a comprehensive analysis of the critical gene regulatory networks involving OLIG2 in glioma initiating cell (GIC) lines. In vitro differentiation studies showed that proneural GIC lines possess the potential to differentiate into astrocytic, neuronal, and oligodendrocytic lineages, whereas mesenchymal GICs exhibited limited potential for neural lineage differentiation following retinoic acid induction. We also showed that CDK2-mediated OLIG2 phosphorylation stabilizes OLIG2 protein from proteasomal degradation. Phosphorylated OLIG2 binds to the E-Box regions of p27 promoter and represses p27 transcription, which in turn activates CDK2 in positive feedback manner. CDK2-mediated OLIG2 phosphorylation promotes cell cycle progression, cell proliferation, and tumorigenesis. OLIG2 inhibition disrupted cell cycle control mechanism by decreasing CDK2 and elevating apoptosis-related molecules. Inhibition of CDK2 activity disrupted OLIG2-CDK2 interactions and attenuated OLIG2 protein stability. In addition, OLIG2-high glioma initiating cells are highly sensitive to CDK2 inhibitor treatment, indicating that OLIG2 can be a biomarker for personalized treatment for glioblastoma patients with CDK2 inhibitors. In conclusion, we have identified OLIG2-CDK2 interactions in glioma stem cells that can be targeted by CDK2 inhibitors and this may allow the selection of patients with high likelihood of responding to this therapy.


2011 ◽  
Vol 366 (1584) ◽  
pp. 3562-3571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petra Langerak ◽  
Paul Russell

Double-strand breaks (DSBs), arising from exposure to exogenous clastogens or as a by-product of endogenous cellular metabolism, pose grave threats to genome integrity. DSBs can sever whole chromosomes, leading to chromosomal instability, a hallmark of cancer. Healing broken DNA takes time, and it is therefore essential to temporarily halt cell division while DSB repair is underway. The seminal discovery of cyclin-dependent kinases as master regulators of the cell cycle unleashed a series of studies aimed at defining how the DNA damage response network delays cell division. These efforts culminated with the identification of Cdc25, the protein phosphatase that activates Cdc2/Cdk1, as a critical target of the checkpoint kinase Chk1. However, regulation works both ways, as recent studies have revealed that Cdc2 activity and cell cycle position determine whether DSBs are repaired by non-homologous end-joining or homologous recombination (HR). Central to this regulation are the proteins that initiate the processing of DNA ends for HR repair, Mre11–Rad50–Nbs1 protein complex and Ctp1/Sae2/CtIP, and the checkpoint kinases Tel1/ATM and Rad3/ATR. Here, we review recent findings and provide insight on how proteins that regulate cell cycle progression affect DSB repair, and, conversely how proteins that repair DSBs affect cell cycle progression.


2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (22) ◽  
pp. 3890-3901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pankaj Acharya ◽  
Nitin Raj ◽  
Martin S. Buckley ◽  
Liang Zhang ◽  
Stephanie Duperon ◽  
...  

The Retinoblastoma (RB) transcriptional corepressor and related family of pocket proteins play central roles in cell cycle control and development, and the regulatory networks governed by these factors are frequently inactivated during tumorigenesis. During normal growth, these proteins are subject to tight control through at least two mechanisms. First, during cell cycle progression, repressor potential is down-regulated by Cdk-dependent phosphorylation, resulting in repressor dissociation from E2F family transcription factors. Second, RB proteins are subject to proteasome-mediated destruction during development. To better understand the mechanism for RB family protein instability, we characterized Rbf1 turnover in Drosophila and the protein motifs required for its destabilization. We show that specific point mutations in a conserved C-terminal instability element strongly stabilize Rbf1, but strikingly, these mutations also cripple repression activity. Rbf1 is destabilized specifically in actively proliferating tissues of the larva, indicating that controlled degradation of Rbf1 is linked to developmental signals. The positive linkage between Rbf1 activity and its destruction indicates that repressor function is governed in a manner similar to that described by the degron theory of transcriptional activation. Analogous mutations in the mammalian RB family member p107 similarly induce abnormal accumulation, indicating substantial conservation of this regulatory pathway.


Biomimetics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Alex Ellery

We examine the prospect for employing a bio-inspired architecture for a lunar industrial ecology based on genetic regulatory networks. The lunar industrial ecology resembles a metabolic system in that it comprises multiple chemical processes interlinked through waste recycling. Initially, we examine lessons from factory organisation which have evolved into a bio-inspired concept, the reconfigurable holonic architecture. We then examine genetic regulatory networks and their application in the biological cell cycle. There are numerous subtleties that would be challenging to implement in a lunar industrial ecology but much of the essence of biological circuitry (as implemented in synthetic biology, for example) is captured by traditional electrical engineering design with emphasis on feedforward and feedback loops to implement robustness.


2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A322-A322
Author(s):  
M STALLS ◽  
J SUN ◽  
K THOMPSON ◽  
N VANHOUTEN

2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 317-317
Author(s):  
Xifeng Wu ◽  
Jian Gu ◽  
H. Barton Grossman ◽  
Christopher I. Amos ◽  
Carol Etzel ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document