An analysis of three different prostate cancer risk calculators applied prior to prostate biopsy: A Turkish cohort validation study

Andrologia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Yıldızhan ◽  
Melih Balcı ◽  
Unsal Eroğlu ◽  
Erem Asil ◽  
Seref Coser ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 665 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Hoon Lee ◽  
Ha Bum Jung ◽  
Jae Won Park ◽  
Kyu Hyun Kim ◽  
Jongchan Kim ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. E64-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert K. Nam ◽  
Raj Satkunasivam ◽  
Joseph L. Chin ◽  
Jonathan Izawa ◽  
John Trachtenberg ◽  
...  

Introduction: Current prostate cancer risk calculators are limited in impact because only a probability of having prostate cancer is provided. We developed the next generation of prostate cancer risk calculator that incorporates life expectancy in order to better evaluate prostate cancer risk in context to a patient’s age and comorbidity.Methods: We combined two cohorts to develop the new risk calculator. The first was 5638 subjects who all underwent a prostate biopsy for prostate cancer detection. The second was 979 men diagnosed with prostate cancer with long-term survival data. Two regression models were used to create multivariable nomograms and an online prostate cancer risk calculator was developed.Results: Of the 5638 patients who underwent a prostate biopsy, 629 (11%) were diagnosed with aggressive prostate cancer (Gleason Score 7[4+3] or more). Of the 979 patients who underwent treatment for prostate cancer, the 10-year overall survival (OS) was 49.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 46.6‒52.9). The first multivariable nomogram for cancer risk had a concordance index of 0.74 (95% CI 0.72, 0.76), and the second nomogram to predict survival had a concordance index of 0.71 (95% CI 0.69‒0.72). The nextgeneration prostate cancer risk calculator was developed online and is available at: http://riskcalc.org/ProstateCA_Screen_Tool.Conclusions: We have developed the next-generation prostate cancer risk calculator that incorporates a patient’s life expectancy based on age and comorbidity. This approach will better evaluate prostate cancer risk. Future studies examining other populations will be needed for validation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Tolksdorf ◽  
Michael W. Kattan ◽  
Stephen A. Boorjian ◽  
Stephen J. Freedland ◽  
Karim Saba ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Online clinical risk prediction tools built on data from multiple cohorts are increasingly being utilized for contemporary doctor-patient decision-making and validation. This report outlines a comprehensive data science strategy for building such tools with application to the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group prostate cancer risk prediction tool. Methods We created models for high-grade prostate cancer risk using six established risk factors. The data comprised 8492 prostate biopsies collected from ten institutions, 2 in Europe and 8 across North America. We calculated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for discrimination, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test statistic (HLS) for calibration and the clinical net benefit at risk threshold 15%. We implemented several internal cross-validation schemes to assess the influence of modeling method and individual cohort on validation performance. Results High-grade disease prevalence ranged from 18% in Zurich (1863 biopsies) to 39% in UT Health San Antonio (899 biopsies). Visualization revealed outliers in terms of risk factors, including San Juan VA (51% abnormal digital rectal exam), Durham VA (63% African American), and Zurich (2.8% family history). Exclusion of any cohort did not significantly affect the AUC or HLS, nor did the choice of prediction model (pooled, random-effects, meta-analysis). Excluding the lowest-prevalence Zurich cohort from training sets did not statistically significantly change the validation metrics for any of the individual cohorts, except for Sunnybrook, where the effect on the AUC was minimal. Therefore the final multivariable logistic model was built by pooling the data from all cohorts using logistic regression. Higher prostate-specific antigen and age, abnormal digital rectal exam, African ancestry and a family history of prostate cancer increased risk of high-grade prostate cancer, while a history of a prior negative prostate biopsy decreased risk (all p-values < 0.004). Conclusions We have outlined a multi-cohort model-building internal validation strategy for developing globally accessible and scalable risk prediction tools.


2019 ◽  
Vol 62 ◽  
pp. 101578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana C. Vidal ◽  
Lauren E. Howard ◽  
Emily Wiggins ◽  
Amanda M. De Hoedt ◽  
Stephen L. Shiao ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 179 (4S) ◽  
pp. 640-641
Author(s):  
David J Hernandez ◽  
Misop Han ◽  
Elizabeth B Humphreys ◽  
Leslie A Mangold ◽  
Michael K Brawer ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (17) ◽  
pp. 4374-4381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Vickers ◽  
Angel M. Cronin ◽  
Monique J. Roobol ◽  
Jonas Hugosson ◽  
J. Stephen Jones ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document