A Descriptive Cost‐Analysis of MYX.1/MCRN003, a Phase 2 Clinical Trial Evaluating High‐dose Weekly Carfilzomib, Cyclophosphamide, and Dexamethasone in Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Author(s):  
Bethany E. Monteith ◽  
Christopher P. Venner ◽  
Matthew C. Cheung ◽  
Joe Pater ◽  
Lois Shepherd ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 123 (7) ◽  
pp. 948-950 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne Lentzsch

In this issue of Blood, Ludwig and colleagues present the data of a phase 2 clinical trial showing that bendamustine, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (BBD) is a very active and well-tolerated regimen in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.1 More importantly, BBD overcomes the adverse prognosis in patients with high-risk cytogenetics.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 5350-5350
Author(s):  
Sikander Ailawadhi ◽  
Howard A Liebman ◽  
Susan Groshen ◽  
Denice D. Tsao-Wei ◽  
Leanne Rochanda ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The role of the tumor microenvironment (TME), including the heparanase/syndecan-1 (H/S1) axis in the growth and progression of multiple myeloma (MM) has been studied principally in in vitroor animal models. Targeting the TME with anti-myeloma agents such as immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) is considered standard but the effect of anticoagulation on the H/S1 axis has not been reported in a clinical trial setting. We investigated the combination of lenalidomide (Len; IMiD) and low-dose dexamethasone (dex) with different doses of the low-molecular-weight heparin, dalteparin (DAL), in treatment-naïve MM patients and report the effects on the H/S1 axis. Methods A randomized phase 2 clinical trial of Len+Dex with prophylactic (5000IU) or therapeutic (200IU/Kg) doses of DAL in newly diagnosed MM patients was initiated. Patients were administered 14 days of respective DAL dose alone as a “run-in” and then Len+Dex were added for a maximum of 6, 28-day cycles. Peripheral blood collection was done on day (D)-14, D-7, D1, D7, D15 in cycle1 and then D1 of each subsequent cycle to measure D-dimer, Syndecan-1 and IL6 levels by ELISA. Log-transformed levels were used in a linear model to test for differences between the two doses of DAL overall, changes over time, as well as different change patterns between the two doses. Basic summary statistics and scatterplots were used to summarize the data, while untransformed data were used for non-parametric summary numbers (medians, ranges, Spearman correlation). Means and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) were based on the log-transformed values and anti-log transformation was used to present the results in the original scale, with the result that differences between the two groups were reported as ratios. Results Eleven patients (5 females, 6 males) have been enrolled in the ongoing trial (target accrual: 30), of which one was ineligible due to an acquired factor VIII inhibitor. Median age at study onset was 60.8 years (range 38.1-69.9 years). Disease stage included International Staging System (ISS) I in 5, II in 4 and III in 2 patients. Lytic lesions at diagnosis were present in 6 (55%) patients while plasmacytomas were noted in 5 (45%) patients. Median bone marrow plasmacytosis was 40% (range 10%-90%). One case of venous thrombosis was noted on treatment in the high-dose arm after 4 cycles of treatment. We did not find any correlations between baseline levels of D-dimer, IL6 or Syndecan with patient age, gender, ISS stage, presence of lytic lesions or plasmacytomas. No significant correlation was observed between the changes in these three parameters over time or related to DAL dose. However, observing shorter treatment periods showed that the D-dimer decreased significantly between C1D-14 and C1D1 for the low-dose group (mean 0.52; 95% CI 0.37, 0.72), high-dose group (mean 0.44; 95% CI 0.31, 0.65) and all patients taken together (mean 0.48; 95% CI 0.4, 0.59). We also noted a significant increase in Syndecan-1 between C1D-14 and C1D1 for the high-dose group (mean 2.06; 95% CI 1.3, 3.25) and for all patients taken together (mean 1.71; 95% CI 1.28, 2.27), but not for the low-dose group. No significant change was noted in IL6 for this period. However, a significant increase in IL6 was noted early on after the introduction of Len+Dex to DAL between C1D1 and C1D15 in the high-dose (mean 3.21; 95% CI 1.17, 8.8) and overall (mean 2.46; 95% CI 1.52, 3.99) patient groups. These changes did not persist in subsequent treatment periods. Conclusions In an ongoing phase 2 clinical trial focused on the modulation of H/S1 axis in response to treatment of MM with IMiDs and DAL, we noted a significant decrease in D-dimer when patients were treated with DAL alone prior to initiating Len+Dex. We observed a significant increase in Syndecan-1 in all patients as well as in the high-dose group in response to treatment with DAL alone. We also noted an IL6 flair phenomenon, with a significant increase in IL6 in all patients immediately after the initiation of Len+Dex. These initial findings suggest significant modulation of the MM microenvironment by LMWH. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Use of lenalidomide for treatment-naive multiple myeloma patients, Use of dalteparin for prophylaxis of thromboembolism in multiple myeloma patients treated with immunomodulatory agent with dexamethasone. O'Connell:Celgene Corp.: Speakers Bureau.


2021 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 67-74
Author(s):  
Shreya Armstrong ◽  
Stephanie Brown ◽  
May Stancliffe ◽  
Peter Ostler ◽  
Robert Hughes ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1965-1965
Author(s):  
Shirshendu Sinha ◽  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
Suzanne Hayman ◽  
Francis Buadi ◽  
Kristen Detweiler Short ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1965 Background: Pomalidomide is an immunomodulatory compound to be used for heavily pre-treated patients with relapse and refractory multiple myeloma and has shown considerable efficacy in recent clinical trials. It is not clear how patients may respond to other therapies, once the disease becomes refractory to pomalidomide. We examined this question among a cohort of patients receiving pomalidomide therapy in phase 2 clinical trials. Methods: Patients enrolled in an ongoing phase 2 clinical trial of pomalidomide (2-4 mg daily) along with dexamethasone (40 mg weekly), in relapsed myeloma, form the study population. Several cohorts of patients (>= 3 prior therapies not specified, lenalidomide refractory, and lenalidomide and bortezomib refractory patients were enrolled sequentially in this trial (Lacy, M.Q., et al., J Clin Oncol, 2009. 27(30): p.5008–14). Only those patients who have gone off study for disease progression were included in the current analysis. Details of subsequent therapies and survival data were obtained from the medical records. Results: Forty-seven patients from among 142 patients enrolled on the clinical trial between November, 2007 and April, 2010 were included in the study. The median (range) duration of pomalidomide therapy was 4 (0.6-16) months. 15 (32%) patients were lenalidomide refractory and 11 (23%) were refractory to both lenalidomide and bortezomib at the time of study entry. The best confirmed response to pomalidomide was MR (Minimal Response) or better in 23 patients (52%). Various regimens were employed following relapse on pomalidomide. The response to the first regimen following relapse in the 34 patients where salvage therapy was initiated is as shown in Table 1. Overall, 81 regimens were employed across 34 patients; median (range) number of regimens per patients was 1 (0-8). The response rates to the different regimens were as shown in the Table 1. The median overall survival (OS) from the time of progression on pomalidomide was 14.7 months (95% CI; 4, NR). The OS was similar between those patients who had a response to pomalidomide (MR or better) and those who did not. However the OS was shorter for patients who were refractory to lenalidomide and bortezomib (2.1 months) compared to those who were lenalidomide refractory only (6.5 months), and the non-refractory group (NR), P=0.06. Conclusions: This study confirms poor outcome of the patients relapsing after all available therapies. It also gives interesting insights into the activity of different regimens among patients who have relapsed after pomalidomide. The findings once again highlight the incurable nature of the disease and warrant further investigation to develop newer effective treatment regimens for this group of patients who presently do not have effective therapeutic options especially in the relapsed setting. Regimens: ASCT: Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation, Bz: Bortezomib, Mel=Melphalan, Dex: Dexamethasone, CRD: Cyclophosphamide, Revlimid (Lenalidomide), Dexamethasone, CTX; Cyclophosphamide, Len; Lenalidomide, Sor: Sorafenib, VDT-PACE: Velcade (Bortezomib), Dexamethasone, Thalidomide, Cisplatin, Adriamycin, Cyclophosphamide, Etoposide. Response: SD; Stable Disease; Prog; Progression MR: Minimal Response; PR: Partial Response. Disclosures: Kumar: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding. Mikhael:Celgene: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Dispenzieri:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Binding Site: Honoraria.


CHEST Journal ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 148 (4) ◽  
pp. 4A ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Corren ◽  
Mario Castro ◽  
Vijay Joish ◽  
Vera Mastey ◽  
Caroline Amand ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 1111-1116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Chao ◽  
Daryl Lim Joon ◽  
Vincent Khoo ◽  
Nathan Lawrentschuk ◽  
Huong Ho ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2404-2404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neal J. Weinreb ◽  
G.A. Grabowski ◽  
G.M. Pastores ◽  
P.M. Fernhoff ◽  
P.B. Kaplan ◽  
...  

Abstract Gaucher disease (GD) is caused by a deficiency of the lysosomal enzyme β-glucocerebrosidase (GCase). Deficient GCase activity leads to symptoms such as anemia, thrombocytopenia, hepatosplenomegaly, bone necrosis, infarcts and osteoporosis, and in some cases, neuropathic disease. The pharmacological chaperone AT2101 (isofagamine tartrate) selectively binds and stabilizes GCase in the ER and increases trafficking of the enzyme to the lysosome. In single- and repeat-dose Phase 1 clinical trials involving 72 healthy volunteers, AT2101 was well tolerated with no serious adverse events. In the repeat-dose study, a dose-dependent increase in GCase levels in white blood cells (up to 3.5-fold) was observed during the 7 day treatment period, and enzyme levels remained elevated for more than a week after removal of the drug. To evaluate the effects of AT2101 on a range of different GCase variants, we conducted an ex vivo response study using macrophages and EBV-transformed lymphoblasts derived from GD patients. The study was conducted on samples from 53 patients enrolled at 5 sites in the United States. The study included 26 males and 26 females with type I GD, and one male with type III GD. Patients ranged in age from 7 to 83 years; 50 of 53 patients were receiving imiglucerase and blood was drawn prior to enzyme infusion. Incubation of cells with AT2101 (5 days) increased GCase levels in macrophages or lymphoblasts derived from 52 of 53 patients representing 18 different genotypes (mean: 2.6-fold, range: 1.4- to 8.6-fold). Plasma was also screened for potential biomarkers associated with inflammation, bone metabolism, multiple myeloma and neurodegeneration. Analysis of 40 markers showed elevated levels of chitotriosidase activity, TRACP 5b, PARC, IL-8, IL-17, VEGF, MIP-1α and α-synuclein and reduced bone-specific alkaline phosphatase levels in some patients. These results show that an imbalance between osteoclast and osteoblast activities may remain even though treatment with imiglucerase (Wenstrup et al. 2007. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 22: 119–26) and bisphosphonates (Wenstrup et al. 2004. Blood, 104: 1253–7) have been shown to increase bone mass in GD patients. Interestingly, increases in IL-8, IL-17, VEGF, MIP-1α, impaired osteoblast activity and increased osteoclast activity have also been implicated in the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma, and it has been reported that GD patients have an increased risk of developing multiple myeloma (Rosenbloom et al. 2005. Blood, 105: 4569–72). To determine if these biomarkers respond to treatment with AT2101, they are being monitored in an ongoing 6-month Phase 2 clinical trial with AT2101 in GD patients. Additionally, a 4-week Phase 2 clinical trial with AT2101 is being conducted in GD patients and preliminary results are expected by the end of 2007.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document