scholarly journals Establishing the research agenda for oral healthcare using the Dialogue Model—patient involvement in a joint research agenda with practitioners

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Puck van der Wouden ◽  
Femke Hilverda ◽  
Geert van der Heijden ◽  
Hagay Shemesh ◽  
Carina Pittens
Keyword(s):  
Research Agenda ◽  
Patient Involvement ◽  
Joint Research ◽  
Dialogue Model

Patient involvement in a scientific advisory process: Setting the research agenda for medical products

Health Policy ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 107 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 231-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janneke Elisabeth Elberse ◽  
Carina Anna Cornelia Maria Pittens ◽  
Tjard de Cock Buning ◽  
Jacqueline Elisabeth Willy Broerse
Keyword(s):  
Research Agenda ◽  
Patient Involvement ◽  
Medical Products ◽  
Scientific Advisory

scholarly journals Connecting International Relations and Public Administration: Toward A Joint Research Agenda for the Study of International Bureaucracy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Fleischer ◽  
Nina Reiners
Keyword(s):  
International Relations ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Joint Research ◽  
Theoretical Perspectives ◽  
Recent Debate ◽  
International Bureaucracy ◽  
Analytical Frameworks ◽  
Advance Knowledge ◽  
International Bureaucracies

Abstract The recent debate on administrative bodies in international organizations has brought forward multiple theoretical perspectives, analytical frameworks, and methodological approaches. Despite these efforts to advance knowledge on these actors, the research program on international public administrations (IPAs) has missed out on two important opportunities: reflection on scholarship in international relations (IR) and public administration and synergies between these disciplinary perspectives. Against this backdrop, the essay is a discussion of the literature on IPAs in IR and public administration. We found influence, authority, and autonomy of international bureaucracies have been widely addressed and helped to better understand the agency of such non-state actors in global policy-making. Less attention has been given to the crucial macro-level context of politics for administrative bodies, despite the importance in IR and public administration scholarship. We propose a focus on agency and politics as future avenues for a comprehensive, joint research agenda for international bureaucracies.

scholarly journals Dialogue and deliberation: New approaches to including patients in setting health and healthcare research agendas

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 429-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tineke A Abma
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Agenda Setting ◽  
Health Research ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Health Care Services ◽  
Research Process ◽  
Healthcare Research ◽  
Power Dynamics ◽  
Dialogue Model

Collective participation of patients in health and medical research is an emerging trend. The literature falls, however, short on process descriptions focusing on the power dynamics when sharing power with patients in the research process. This article therefore aims to generate knowledge on how to involve patients and redress power imbalances in health research agenda setting. The context for the study was health research agenda setting on Parkinson’s Disease in The Netherlands. The dialogue model was used: a multistakeholder and multiphased process for the coproduction of research agenda. Patients with Parkinson were involved in all stages of the agenda setting. It appeared to be crucial for people with Parkinson to create a free, protective, and communicative space of mutual encouragement to develop power from within and to articulate their voice. This prepared them for meaningful deliberations with health-care professionals, researchers, and funding agencies. Ultimately, these deliberations resulted in a relevant and useful research agenda that better enable health-care services to meet the needs and expectations of patients.

scholarly journals Environment and mental health – developing a research agenda

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Lindert
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Neurological Disorders ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Environmental Epidemiology ◽  
Environmental Research ◽  
Joint Research ◽  
Isi Web Of Science

Abstract Background Environmental research and research on mental and neurological disorders remains largely separated. Research methods in both fields are different using diverse approaches. Aim of this talk is to highlight differences and commonalities in research methods in the fields of environmental and neuropsychiatric epidemiology. Methods A scoping review of methods was preformed using databases such as PUBMED, ISI Web of Science, Embase, CINHAL and PSYCHINFO. Results The search yielded several hundred citations. The search will be updated in July 2019 to provide the most recent results in the workshop. So far the review suggests that the fields of environmental epidemiology and neuropsychiatric epidemiology still are separated. Discussion: Approaches to build a joint research agenda will be discussed. Some methods which are used in both subdisciplines of epidemiology will be described in detail in the workshop. Likewise, challenges in collaboration will be discussed with the audience. This discussion with workshop participants is a possibility to learn from each other and build interdisciplinary bridges.

Unique role of rheumatology in establishing collaborative relationships in research. Past, present and future of patient engagement

2018 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maarten de Wit ◽  
Adewale Adebajo
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Research ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Patient Involvement ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Collaborative Relationships ◽  
Unique Role ◽  
Leading Role ◽  
Grant Applications

The specialty of rheumatology takes care of people with disabling and long-term musculoskeletal conditions. For these patients, good healthcare requires the establishment of a sustainable partnership with healthcare professionals. For over two decades, rheumatology has been a frontrunner in piloting and implementing new kinds of partnerships in scientific research. In this viewpoint paper, we provide evidence for the leading role of rheumatology in developing strategies for engaging patients in research agenda setting, outcome research, developing treatment recommendations, assessing grant applications, conducting patient-centred research and transferring knowledge from research into practice. Experiences and lessons learnt in rheumatology are regularly published and are currently widely adapted and implemented in other specialties and research contexts. Challenges still exist and it is expected that rheumatology, as a leading discipline in this field, may further enhance our knowledge, expertise and understanding of the conditions for relational empowerment and meaningful patient involvement.

scholarly journals What do end-users want to know about managing the performance of healthcare delivery systems? Co-designing a context-specific and practice-relevant research agenda

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenna M. Evans ◽  
Julie E. Gilbert ◽  
Jasmine Bacola ◽  
Victoria Hagens ◽  
Vicky Simanovski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Management ◽  
Behaviour Change ◽  
Priority Setting ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Research Direction ◽  
End Users ◽  
End User ◽  
Joint Research ◽  
Research Priority ◽  
User Groups

Abstract Background Despite increasing interest in joint research priority-setting, few studies engage end-user groups in setting research priorities at the intersection of the healthcare and management disciplines. With health systems increasingly establishing performance management programmes to account for and incentivize performance, it is important to conduct research that is actionable by the end-users involved with or impacted by these programmes. The aim of this study was to co-design a research agenda on healthcare performance management with and for end-users in a specific jurisdictional and policy context. Methods We undertook a rapid review of the literature on healthcare performance management (n = 115) and conducted end-user interviews (n = 156) that included a quantitative ranking exercise to prioritize five directions for future research. The quantitative rankings were analysed using four methods: mean, median, frequency ranked first or second, and frequency ranked fifth. The interview transcripts were coded inductively and analysed thematically to identify common patterns across participant responses. Results Seventy-three individual and group interviews were conducted with 156 end-users representing diverse end-user groups, including administrators, clinicians and patients, among others. End-user groups prioritized different research directions based on their experiences and information needs. Despite this variation, the research direction on motivating performance improvement had the highest overall mean ranking and was most often ranked first or second and least often ranked fifth. The research direction was modified based on end-user feedback to include an explicit behaviour change lens and stronger consideration for the influence of context. Conclusions Joint research priority-setting resulted in a practice-driven research agenda capable of generating results to inform policy and management practice in healthcare as well as contribute to the literature. The results suggest that end-users are keen to open the “black box” of performance management to explore more nuanced questions beyond “does performance management work?” End-users want to know how, when and why performance management contributes to behaviour change (or fails to) among front-line care providers.

Business, Human Rights and Peace: Linking the Academic Conversation

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-240
Author(s):  
John E. KATSOS
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Joint Research ◽  
Scholarly Community ◽  
Business And Human Rights ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Multidisciplinary Nature ◽  
Similarities And Differences ◽  
Business In Society

AbstractThe fields of business and human rights (BHR) and business for peace (B4P) have overlaps in how they view business in society and in their multidisciplinary nature. This paper seeks to build on the work of BHR scholars in connecting with the B4P scholarly community, to bridge the divide by explaining the elements of the B4P literature that might be of interest for BHR scholars, and to describe a joint research agenda for scholars in both fields. The paper begins with a literature review of the major assertions and findings of B4P on the role that business can and should play in enhancing peace. Similarities and differences in approach and theories between BHR and B4P are then noted. A common research agenda is proposed that BHR and B4P scholars may use as a starting point for broader collaboration.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document