scholarly journals Combination CGRP monoclonal antibody and onabotulinumtoxinA treatment for preventive treatment in chronic migraine

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Ailani ◽  
Andrew M. Blumenfeld
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Chronic Migraine ◽  
Preventive Treatment

scholarly journals CGRP monoclonal antibody for preventive treatment of chronic migraine: An update of meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e01215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Han ◽  
Yao Liu ◽  
Hai Xiong ◽  
Peiwei Hong
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Chronic Migraine ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Preventive Treatment

scholarly journals Calcitonin Gene–Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibody Versus Botulinum Toxin for the Preventive Treatment of Chronic Migraine: Evidence From Indirect Treatment Comparison

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiajie Lu ◽  
Quanquan Zhang ◽  
Xiaoning Guo ◽  
Wei Liu ◽  
Chunyang Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Botulinum Toxin ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Chronic Migraine ◽  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Indirect Treatment Comparison ◽  
Treatment Comparison ◽  
Calcitonin Gene ◽  
Indirect Treatment

Background: The previously approved botulinum toxin and nowadays promising calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibody have shown efficacy for preventing chronic migraine (CM). However, there is no direct evidence for their relative effectiveness and safety. In this study, we conducted an indirect treatment comparison to compare the efficacy and safety of CGRP monoclonal antibody with botulinum toxin for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine.Methods: Up to August 31, 2020, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central). Weighted mean difference (WMD) and relative risk (RR) were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. Indirect treatment comparison (ITC) software was used to conduct indirect treatment comparison.Results: Ten studies were pooled with 6,325 patients in our meta-analysis. Both botulinum toxin and CGRP monoclonal antibody demonstrated favorable efficacy in the change of migraine days, headache days, HIT-6 score, and 50% migraine responder rate compared with placebo. In indirect treatment comparison, CGRP monoclonal antibody was superior to botulinum toxin in the frequency of acute analgesics intake (WMD = −1.31, 95% CI: −3.394 to 0.774, p = 0.02113), the rate of treatment-related adverse events (AEs) (RR = 0.664, 95% CI: 0.469 to 0.939, p = 0.04047), and the rate of treatment-related serious adverse events (RR = 0.505, 95% CI: 0.005 to 46.98, p < 0.001).Conclusion: For chronic migraine patients, CGRP monoclonal antibody was slightly better than botulinum toxin in terms of efficacy and safety. In the future, head-to-head trials would be better to evaluate the efficacy and safety between different medications in the prevention of chronic migraine.

Galcanezumab for the prevention of migraine

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay M Frerichs ◽  
Deborah I Friedman
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
Calcitonin Gene Related Peptide ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Related Peptide ◽  
Calcitonin Gene

Migraine is a common and disabling disorder affecting approximately 1.02 billion people worldwide. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) has been identified as playing an important role in the pathophysiology of migraine and several migraine-specific therapies targeting the CGRP ligand or its receptor have been approved since 2018 for the acute and preventive treatment of migraine. This review focuses on the pharmacology, clinical efficacy and safety/tolerability of galcanezumab, an anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody approved for the prevention of migraine.

Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of TEV-48125 for preventive treatment of chronic migraine: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b study

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 1091-1100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo E Bigal ◽  
Lars Edvinsson ◽  
Alan M Rapoport ◽  
Richard B Lipton ◽  
Egilius L H Spierings ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Migraine ◽  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo

TOP-PRO study: A randomized double-blind controlled trial of topiramate versus propranolol for prevention of chronic migraine

Cephalalgia ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 033310242110474
Author(s):  
Debashish Chowdhury ◽  
Luv Bansal ◽  
Ashish Duggal ◽  
Debabrata Datta ◽  
Ankit Mundra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Chronic Migraine ◽  
Virus Disease ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
Point Estimate ◽  
Tolerability Profile ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Objective The aim of the TOP-PRO-study, a double-blind randomized controlled trial, was to assess the efficacy (non-inferiority) and tolerability of propranolol compared to topiramate for the prevention of chronic migraine. Background Except for topiramate, oral preventive treatment for chronic migraine lacks credible evidence. Methods Chronic migraine patients aged above 18 years and less than 65 years of age, not on any preventive treatment were randomly allocated to receive topiramate (100 mg/day) or propranolol (160 mg/day). The primary efficacy outcome was the mean change in migraine days per 28 days at the end of 24 weeks from baseline. A mean difference of 1.5 days per four weeks was chosen as the cut-off delta value. Multiple secondary efficacy outcomes and treatment emergent adverse events were also assessed. Results As against the planned sample size of 244, only 175 patients could be enrolled before the spread of the corona virus disease-2019 pandemic and enforcement of lockdown in India. Of the 175 randomized patients, 95 (topiramate 46 and propranolol 49) completed the trial. The mean change in migraine days was −5.3 ± 1.2 vs −7.3 ± 1.1 days (p = 0.226) for topiramate and propranolol groups respectively. Propranolol was found to be non-inferior and not superior to topiramate (point estimate of −1.99 with a 95% confidence interval of −5.23 to 1.25 days). Multiple secondary outcomes also did not differ between the two groups. Intention to treat analysis of 175 patients and per-protocol analysis of 95 patients yielded concordant results. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups. Conclusion Propranolol (160mg/day) was non-inferior, non-superior to topiramate (100mg/day) for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine and had a comparable tolerability profile. Trial Registration: Clinical Trials Registry-India CTRI/2019/05/018997)

Occipital nerve block for the short-term preventive treatment of migraine: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study

Cephalalgia ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 959-968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esma Dilli ◽  
Rashmi Halker ◽  
Bert Vargas ◽  
Joseph Hentz ◽  
Teresa Radam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Migraine ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
Placebo Treatment ◽  
Baseline Period ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Occipital Nerve ◽  
Occipital Nerve Block ◽  
Severe Migraine

Background Occipital nerve (ON) injections with corticosteroids and/or local anesthetics have been employed for the acute and preventive treatment of migraine for decades. However, to date there is no randomized, placebo-controlled evidence to support the use of occipital nerve block (ONB) for the prevention of migraine. Objective The objective of this article is to determine the efficacy of ONB with local anesthetic and corticosteroid for the preventive treatment of migraine. Participants and methods Patients between 18 and 75 years old with ICHD-II-defined episodic (> 1 attack per week) or chronic migraine (modified ICHD-II as patients with > 10 days with consumption of acute medications were permitted into the study) were randomized to receive either 2.5 ml 0.5% bupivacaine plus 0.5 ml (20 mg) methylprednisolone over the ipsilateral (unilateral headache) or bilateral (bilateral headache) ON or 2.75 ml normal saline plus 0.25 ml 1% lidocaine without epinephrine (placebo). Patients completed a one-month headache diary prior to and after the double-blind injection. The primary outcome measure was defined as a 50% or greater reduction in the frequency of days with moderate or severe migraine headache in the four-week post-injection compared to the four-week pre-injection baseline period. Results Thirty-four patients received active and 35 patients received placebo treatment. Because of missing data, the full analysis of 33 patients in the active and 30 patients in the placebo group was analyzed for efficacy. In the active and placebo groups respectively, the mean frequency of at least moderate (mean 9.8 versus 9.5) and severe (3.6 versus 4.3) migraine days and acute medication days (7.9 versus 10.0) were not substantially different at baseline. The percentage of patients with at least a 50% reduction in the frequency of moderate or severe headache days was 30% for both groups (10/30 vs nine of 30, Δ 0.00, 95% CI –0.22 to 0.23). Conclusions Greater ONB does not reduce the frequency of moderate to severe migraine days in patients with episodic or chronic migraine compared to placebo. The study was registered with ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT00915473).

scholarly journals Migraine

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 1407-1427
Author(s):  
Mr. Ghene Mauli Ganesh
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Migraine ◽  
Medication Overuse ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
Primary Headaches ◽  
Brain Disorder ◽  
Current State ◽  
The Common ◽  
Chronic Headaches ◽  
Migrainous Headache

Abstract: Migraine is the most common disabling brain disorder. Chronic migraine, a condition characterized by the experience of migrainous headache on at least 15 days per month, is highly disabling. Patients with chronic migraine present to primary care, are often referred for management to secondary care, and make up a large proportion of patients in specialist headache clinics. Many patients with chronic migraine also have medication overuse, defined as using a compound analgesic, opioid, triptan or ergot derivative on at least 10 days per month. All doctors will encounter patients with chronic headaches. A basic working knowledge of the common primary headaches, and a rational manner of approaching the patient with these conditions, allows a specific diagnosis of chronic migraine to be made quickly and safely, and by making this diagnosis one opens up a substantial number of acute and preventive treatment options. This article discusses the current state of management of chronic migraine.

Fremanezumab as a preventive treatment for episodic and chronic migraine

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 719-728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo E. Bigal ◽  
Sarah Walter ◽  
Alan M. Rapoport
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Migraine ◽  
Preventive Treatment

scholarly journals Botulinum Toxin in the Treatment of Headache

Toxins ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 803
Author(s):  
Werner J. Becker
Keyword(s):  
Botulinum Toxin ◽  
Chronic Migraine ◽  
Mechanism Of Action ◽  
Recombinant Dna ◽  
Botulinum Toxin Type A ◽  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
Botulinum Toxin Type ◽  
Preventive Therapy ◽  
Ongoing Research ◽  
Recombinant Dna Techniques

Botulinum toxin type A has been used in the treatment of chronic migraine for over a decade and has become established as a well-tolerated option for the preventive therapy of chronic migraine. Ongoing research is gradually shedding light on its mechanism of action in migraine prevention. Given that its mechanism of action is quite different from that of the new monoclonal antibodies directed against calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptor, it is unlikely to be displaced to any major extent by them. Both will likely remain as important tools for patients with chronic migraine and the clinicians assisting them. New types of botulinum toxin selective for sensory pain neurons may well be discovered or produced by recombinant DNA techniques in the coming decade, and this may greatly enhance its therapeutic usefulness. This review summarizes the evolution of botulinum toxin use in headache management over the past several decades and its role in the preventive treatment of chronic migraine and other headache disorders.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document