Comparative effectiveness research: evidence-based medicine meets health care reform in the USA

2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 976-984 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra J. Tanenbaum
1998 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 765-768
Author(s):  
Kwame McKenzie

Managed care is a phrase on the lips of every US psychiatrist. Some believe that this revolution in health care has brought US doctors kicking and screaming into the age of ‘cost-effective’, ‘evidence-based medicine’ (Mechanic, 1997). But most psychiatrists I interviewed from Boston, San Francisco and New York, thought it had transformed them from autonomous professionals to automatons.


Author(s):  
Andrea Cipriani ◽  
Stefan Leucht ◽  
John R. Geddes

The aim of evidence-based medicine is to integrate current best evidence from research with clinical expertise and patient values. However, it is known that one of the major challenges for clinicians is to move from the theory of evidence-based medicine to the practice of it. Evidence-based practice requires new skills of the clinician, including framing a clear question based on a clinical problem, searching and critically appraising the relevant literature, and applying the findings to routine clinical decision-making, ideally at the individual patient level. Scientific evidence is increasingly accessible through journals and information services that should combine high-quality evidence with information technology. However, the process is not straightforward, as there are several barriers to the successful application of research evidence to health care. This chapter discusses both the prospects for harnessing evidence to improve health care and the problems that clinicians will need to overcome to practise ‘evidence-based-ly’.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document