Differences in multidisciplinary team assessment and treatment between patients with stage IV colon and rectal cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 768-774 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Segelman ◽  
T. Singnomklao ◽  
H. Hellborg ◽  
A. Martling
2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Saraste ◽  
A Martling ◽  
PJ Nilsson ◽  
J Blom ◽  
S Törnberg ◽  
...  

Objectives To compare preoperative staging, multidisciplinary team-assessment, and treatment in patients with screening detected and non-screening detected colorectal cancer. Methods Data on patient and tumour characteristics, staging, multidisciplinary team-assessment and treatment in patients with screening and non-screening detected colorectal cancer from 2008 to 2012 were collected from the Stockholm–Gotland screening register and the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Results The screening group had a higher proportion of stage I disease (41 vs. 15%; p < 0.001), a more complete staging of primary tumour and metastases and were more frequently multidisciplinary team-assessed than the non-screening group ( p < 0.001). In both groups, patients with endoscopically resected cancers were less completely staged and multidisciplinary team-assessed than patients with surgically resected cancers ( p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed between the screening and non-screening groups in the use of neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer (68 vs.76%), surgical treatment with local excision techniques in stage I rectal cancer (6 vs. 9%) or adjuvant chemotherapy in stages II and III disease (46 vs. 52%). Emergency interventions for colorectal cancer occurred in 4% of screening participants vs. 11% of non-compliers. Conclusions Screening detected cancer patients were staged and multidisciplinary team assessed more extensively than patients with non-screening detected cancers. Staging and multidisciplinary team assessment prior to endoscopic resection was less complete compared with surgical resection. Extensive surgical and (neo)adjuvant treatment was given in stage I disease. Participation in screening reduced the risk of emergency surgery for colorectal cancer.


2016 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-28
Author(s):  
Rokas Rackauskas ◽  
Audrius Dulskas ◽  
Vygintas Aliukonis ◽  
Narimantas Samalavicius

Introduction. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) was introduced into clinical practice in the mid-1990s. Although this technique was established as a bridge to total laparoscopic colorectal surgery there are still those who oppose it. In this study we report our 10 year experience of practicing HALS. Methods. This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 426 patients undergoing hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery for left-sided colon and rectal cancer in a single tertiary care institution, the National Cancer Institute, from January, 2006, to July, 2016. All consenting patients with left sided colon and rectal cancer were included in the analysis. Results. Patient population showed a similar female and male ratio 212 (49.76%) vs. 214 (50.24%). Average age was 64.13 ? 9.92 years (from 26 to 91). Operation time was 108 minutes ? 44.1 min (30 - 320 min). The mean length of the postoperative hospital stay was 6.88, ranging from 2 to 34 days. The pathohistological examination revealed mean lymph node harvest was 16.4 ? 9.61, ranging from 0 to 54. Stage I and II cancer prevailed in the majority of cases, accounting for 129 (30.28%) for each, stage III - 135 (31.69%), and stage IV - 33 (7.74%). Complication rate was 7.27%. Surgical reintervention was required in 10 cases (2.35%). Mortality rate occurred only in two (0.47%) patients. Conclusion. In conclusion, the HALS technique combines the benefits of a minimal invasive technique for the patient and palpatory benefits for the surgeon, which makes surgery for left-sided colon and rectum cancer faster, and with a similar outcome to laparoscopic colectomy.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 518-518
Author(s):  
E. P. Mitchell ◽  
A. Topham ◽  
R. Singla ◽  
S. Maron ◽  
J. Schoenfeld ◽  
...  

518 Background: African Americans (AA) have a higher incidence and lower survival rates from colon and rectal cancer than Caucasian Americans (C). This disparity has been attributed to many factors, including diagnosis at later stage, unfavorable histopathologic features, inadequate treatment, and socioeconomic factors. The multidisciplinary management setting ensures similarity in management and treatment planning. In this study, we assessed the pathological features and evaluated survival outcomes in patients with CRC in AA and CA using a large single institutional database. Methods: We compiled data from 3,826 patients with colon and rectal cancer treated at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital from 1988-2009 and used Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results registry data from 1988-2004 to compare survival rates. Independent variables included age, racial background, site of primary tumor, degree of differentiation, stage at presentation, recurrence-free survival and overall survival rates for colon and rectal cancer and for each stage of disease. We compared survival rates using statistical modeling to account for differences in patient and disease characteristics between the two groups. Results: At diagnosis, AA pts presented with more advanced stage of disease (p < 0.0001), were more likely to have proximal disease (p < 0.000000528), had worse overall 5-year survival, and worse survival stage-by-stage than C patients. Data also showed that the odds ratio for risk of nodal involvement was greater for AA pts than C pts with lower T tumors. AA pts were more likely to have less well differentiated colon tumors, but more well differentiated rectal tumors, younger age and worse survival stage-by stage than C pts. Although C pts were more likely to have rectal cancer (p < 0.0001), they were less likely to have stage IV disease at presentation. Conclusions: AA pts with CRC are more likely to present at a younger age with later stage, more proximal tumors, have higher nodal involvement with lower T lesions, and less well differentiated tumors than C. Additional studies on biological feature sand molecular markers are ongoing to and will be presented. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (9) ◽  
pp. 1097-1109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Kleespies ◽  
Kathrin E. Füessl ◽  
Hendrik Seeliger ◽  
Martin E. Eichhorn ◽  
Mario H. Müller ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 164-173
Author(s):  
Karin Tamas ◽  
Tonnis H. van Dijk ◽  
Urszula M. Domanska ◽  
Hetty Timmer-Bosscha ◽  
Klaas Havenga ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
M. Cambray ◽  
J. González-Viguera ◽  
M. Macià ◽  
F. Losa ◽  
G. Soler ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document