Cost-effectiveness of sitagliptin-based treatment regimens in European patients with type 2 diabetes and haemoglobin A1c above target on metformin monotherapy

2008 ◽  
Vol 10 (s1) ◽  
pp. 43-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Schwarz ◽  
M. Gouveia ◽  
J. Chen ◽  
G. Nocea ◽  
K. Jameson ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dario Giugliano ◽  
Maria Ida Maiorino ◽  
Giusppe Bellastella ◽  
Paolo Chiodini ◽  
Katherine Esposito

2019 ◽  
Vol 160 (31) ◽  
pp. 1207-1215 ◽  
Author(s):  
György Jermendy

Abstract: Type 2 diabetes – due to its natural course – should be considered as a progressive chronic disease. Owing to this fact, antihyperglycemic treatment should be continuously increased stepwise in order to achieve proper glycemic control. Lifestyle modification should be initiated immediately after manifestation, shortly followed by metformin monotherapy, and later, dual or triple combinations and, finally, injectable derivatives – only insulin in the past – should be used for appropriate glycemic control. Guidelines about treatment approach of patients with type 2 diabetes unequivocally emphasize and describe in detail the need of treatment intensification, in other words, stepwise escalation in clinical practice. In the last couple of years, evidences provided that step down therapy, simplification of complex treatment regimens should also be considered in certain cases. This approach was generally called de-escalation in antihyperglycemic treatment which should be considered in patients with type 2 diabetes 1) after bariatric (metabolic) surgery; 2) with significant weight reduction irrespective of its origin; 3) with complex insulin regimens where re-evaluation of this treatment was missed; 4) with continuously decreasing renal function; 5) among elderly patients with comorbidities; 6) in social deprivation. In this article, data about therapeutic de-escalation of antihyperglycemic treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes and first experiences with this treatment approach are summarized. Orv Hetil. 2019; 160(31): 1207–1215.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ping Zhang ◽  
Karen M. Atkinson ◽  
George Bray ◽  
Haiying Chen ◽  
Jeanne M. Clark ◽  
...  

<b>OBJECTIVE </b>To assess the cost-effectiveness (CE) of an intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) compared to standard diabetes support and education (DSE) in adults with overweight/obesity and type 2 diabetes, as implemented in the Action for Health in Diabetes study. <p><b>RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS</b> Data were from 4,827 participants during the first 9 years of the study from 2001 to 2012. Information on Health Utility Index-2 and -3, SF-6D, and Feeling Thermometer [FT]), cost of delivering the interventions, and health expenditures were collected during the study. CE was measured by incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in costs per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Future costs and QALYs were discounted at 3% annually. Costs were in 2012 US dollars. </p> <p><b>RESULTS </b><a>Over the </a>9 years studied, the mean cumulative intervention costs and mean cumulative health care expenditures were $11,275 and $64,453 per person for ILI and $887 and $68,174 for DSE. Thus, ILI cost $6,666 more per person than DSE. Additional QALYs gained by ILI were not statistically significant measured by the HUIs and were 0.17 and 0.16, respectively, measured by SF-6D and FT. The ICERs ranged from no health benefit with a higher cost based on HUIs, to $96,458/QALY and $43,169/QALY, respectively, based on SF-6D and FT. </p> <p><b>Conclusions </b>Whether<b> </b>ILI was cost-effective over the 9-year period is unclear because different health utility measures led to different conclusions. </p>


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Summers

BACKGROUND People from Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) groups are known to have an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes and face greater barriers to accessing healthcare resources compared to their “white British” counterparts. The main mediators of lifestyle behavioural change are gender, generation, geography, genes, God/religion, and gaps in knowledge and economic resources. Dietary and cultural practices of these individuals significantly vary according to gender, generation, geographical origin and religion. Recognition of these factors and implementing culturally sensitive interventions for type 2 diabetes prevention and management is essential in increasing knowledge of healthy eating, engagement in physical activity and improving health outcomes in BAME communities. Few health apps are tailored for BAME populations, and BAME communities are considered hard-to-reach. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to establish whether the Low Carb Program is a viable scalable solution that can be used as an effective tailored type 2 diabetes intervention for BAME communities. We hypothesized that by taking into account cultural sensitivities, providing the platform in native languages and personalising the platform in accordance with known barriers to health disparities including gender, generation, dietary preferences and religion, the app would engage BAME communities and improve type 2 diabetes related health outcomes. METHODS The study used a quasi-experimental research design comprised of an open-label, single-arm, pre-post intervention using a sample of convenience. All 705 adults with type 2 diabetes who had activated their referral to the Low Carb Program as a result of an NHS consultation between September 2018 and March 2019 were followed for a period of 12 months; mean age 54.61 (SD 16.69) years; 58.2% (410/705) women; 45.1% (318/705) white, 28.5% (201/705) Indian/Pakistani/Bangladeshi/Other Central Asian, 10.8% (76/705) Arab, 6.2% (44/705) Mixed/Multiple ethnic groups, 6% (43/705) black, 1.8% (13/705) other, (7/705) 1% Chinese/Japanese/Other East Asian. Mean starting glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 7.99% (SD 2.05%); mean body weight 88.96kg (SD 23.25kg). RESULTS Of the 705 study participants, 513 (72.76%) had completed the Low Carb Program at 12 months. There were statistically significant reductions in body weight and HbA1c in white, Indian/Pakistani/Bangladeshi/Other Central Asian, Arabic and black participants with the most significant differences in the Indian/Pakistani/Bangladeshi/Other Central Asian population HbA1c -1.18% (SD 1.49%) and weight 8.03kg (SD 10.65kg). 82.9% of all participants (419/705) of all participants lost at least 5% of their body weight. CONCLUSIONS Offering the culturally tailored Low Carb Program that empowers members to make dietary and lifestyle changes to different BAME groups is an effective and engaging tool in the management of type 2 diabetes. Most importantly, BAME populations in particular people from Indian/Pakistani/Bangladeshi and Arabic groups who achieve better health outcomes than their white counterparts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document