scholarly journals Does adolescent risk taking imply weak executive function? A prospective study of relations between working memory performance, impulsivity, and risk taking in early adolescence

2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 1119-1133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Romer ◽  
Laura M. Betancourt ◽  
Nancy L. Brodsky ◽  
Joan M. Giannetta ◽  
Wei Yang ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane E. Schreiber ◽  
Katherine L. Possin ◽  
Jonathan M. Girard ◽  
Celiane Rey-Casserly

AbstractTheories of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) increasingly highlight the role of neuropsychological impairment in ADHD; however, a consistent and identifiable pattern of performance on tests is not well established. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Executive Abilities: Measures and Instruments for Neurobehavioral Evaluation and Research (EXAMINER) battery provides measures of common variance across multiple executive function tests within specific domains and was used to characterize which executive functions are most affected in children with ADHD. Thirty-two children (24 male), ages 8–15 years (M = 12.02; SD = 2.29), diagnosed with ADHD and no comorbid disorder completed the NIH EXAMINER battery. Sixty age and gender matched healthy controls were chosen from a database of participants enrolled in the NIH EXAMINER multi-site study. Children with ADHD performed worse on the working memory score compared with the controls. No differences were found on the cognitive control or fluency scores. For children with ADHD, poorer working memory performance predicted parent report of child learning problems. Cognitive control and fluency scores did not predict learning problems. In summary, working memory emerges as a primary impairment in children with ADHD who have no comorbid disorders. Furthermore, working memory weaknesses may underlie the academic problems often seen in children with ADHD. (JINS, 2013, 19, 1–11)


2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brigitte Vugs ◽  
Marc Hendriks ◽  
Juliane Cuperus ◽  
Ludo Verhoeven

2014 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 447-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
April Gile Thomas ◽  
Kathryn C. Monahan ◽  
Angela F. Lukowski ◽  
Elizabeth Cauffman

1993 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 356-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric M. Vernberg ◽  
Susan H. Beery ◽  
Keith K. Ewell ◽  
David A. Absender

1992 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 542 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. DuBois ◽  
Robert D. Felner ◽  
Stephen Brand ◽  
Angela M. Adan ◽  
Elizabeth G. Evans

2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (49) ◽  
pp. e2110811118
Author(s):  
Young Hye Kwon ◽  
Kwangsun Yoo ◽  
Hillary Nguyen ◽  
Yong Jeong ◽  
Marvin M. Chun

While there is a substantial amount of work studying multilingualism’s effect on cognitive functions, little is known about how the multilingual experience modulates the brain as a whole. In this study, we analyzed data of over 1,000 children from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study to examine whether monolinguals and multilinguals differ in executive function, functional brain connectivity, and brain–behavior associations. We observed significantly better performance from multilingual children than monolinguals in working-memory tasks. In one finding, we were able to classify multilinguals from monolinguals using only their whole-brain functional connectome at rest and during an emotional n-back task. Compared to monolinguals, the multilingual group had different functional connectivity mainly in the occipital lobe and subcortical areas during the emotional n-back task and in the occipital lobe and prefrontal cortex at rest. In contrast, we did not find any differences in behavioral performance and functional connectivity when performing a stop-signal task. As a second finding, we investigated the degree to which behavior is reflected in the brain by implementing a connectome-based behavior prediction approach. The multilingual group showed a significant correlation between observed and connectome-predicted individual working-memory performance scores, while the monolingual group did not show any correlations. Overall, our observations suggest that multilingualism enhances executive function and reliably modulates the corresponding brain functional connectome, distinguishing multilinguals from monolinguals even at the developmental stage.


Author(s):  
Margot Peeters ◽  
Karin Monshouwer ◽  
Rens A. G. J. van de Schoot ◽  
Tim Janssen ◽  
Wilma A. M. Vollebergh ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document