scholarly journals Comparing the Psychometric Properties of the Checklist of Nonverbal Pain Behaviors (CNPI) and the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAIN-AD) Instruments

Pain Medicine ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 395-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Ersek ◽  
Keela Herr ◽  
Moni Blazej Neradilek ◽  
Harleah G. Buck ◽  
Brianne Black
2007 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 388-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Siegfried Schuler ◽  
Stefanie Becker ◽  
Roman Kaspar ◽  
Thorsten Nikolaus ◽  
Andreas Kruse ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcia Carla Morete Pinto ◽  
Fabiola Peixoto Minson ◽  
Ana Carolina Biagioni Lopes ◽  
Claudia Regina Laselva

Objective To adapt the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) scale to Brazilian Portuguese with respect to semantic equivalence and cultural aspects, and to evaluate the respective psychometric properties (validity, feasibility, clinical utility and inter-rater agreement). Methods Two-stage descriptive, cross-sectional retrospective study involving cultural and semantic validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the scale, and investigation of its psychometric properties (validity, reliability and clinical utility). The sample consisted of 63 inpatients presenting with neurological deficits and unable to self-report pain. Results Semantic and cultural validation of the PAINAD scale was easily achieved. The scale indicators most commonly used by nurses to assess pain were “Facial expression”, “Body language” and “Consolability”. The Brazilian Portuguese version of the scale has proved to be valid and accurate; good levels of inter-rater agreement assured reproducibility. Conclusion The scale has proved to be useful in daily routine care of hospitalized adult and elderly patients in a variety of clinical settings. Short application time, ease of use, clear instructions and the simplicity of training required for application were emphasized. However, interpretation of facial expression and consolability should be given special attention during pain assessment training.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 323-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucia Muñoz-Narbona ◽  
Sandra Cabrera-Jaime ◽  
Teresa Lluch-Canut ◽  
Natalia Pérez de la Ossa ◽  
Jesús Álvarez Ballano ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Rababa

BACKGROUND: Pain in people with dementia is under recognized, underestimated, and under-treated due to the complexity of pain assessment in this population.SUMMARY: Self-report tools are the gold standard of pain assessment. However, people with dementia are not always able to clearly and meaningfully self-report their pain. Self-report tools capture the affective experience of pain, which is impaired in people with dementia. Observational pain tools are more useful to assess pain especially in people with advanced dementia who are unable to self-report. Observational pain tools capture the physical component of pain experience, which is unchanged in people with dementia. However, nurses often misunderstand the behavioral changes associated with pain in people with dementia. Also, there is a huge inconsistency in presentation of these behavioral changes associated with pain among people with dementia as behaviors can be due to multiple different unmet needs, pain being one.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 741-747
Author(s):  
Silvia Mercedes Coca ◽  
Roberto Ariel Abeldaño Zuñiga

AbstractObjectivePain treatment is an essential component of care for elderly patients with advanced dementia. The objective of this study was to identify and analyze the different scales used for pain assessment in elderly persons diagnosed with dementia, in the literature available at the Latin American level.MethodA systematic review was performed on the existing scales for pain assessment in elderly people diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, and dementia with Lewy bodies.Results226 articles were retrieved from the PUBMED, BIREME, and Scielo databases, of which a total of 10 articles entered the systematic review. The instruments identified in these publications were PAINAD, Abbey, McGill, and PACSLAC, while the Colored Pain Scale, Faces Pain Scale, and VAS scales were used as the silver standard. In Spanish, the Abbey scale, and in Portuguese, the PACSLAC scale showed the best reliability and validity coefficients.Significance of resultsIt is concluded that there are only two appropriate scales for the assessment of pain in people with dementia in the region of interest of this study. It is recommended to generate more evidence for a more accurate assessment of pain in people with dementia.


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bannin De Witt Jansen ◽  
Kevin Brazil ◽  
Peter Passmore ◽  
Hilary Buchanan ◽  
Doreen Maxwell ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document