scholarly journals An Eye-Tracking Investigation of Developmental Changes in Infants’ Exploration of Upright and Inverted Human Faces

Infancy ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 134-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa M. Oakes ◽  
Ann E. Ellis
2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Di Giorgio ◽  
David Méary ◽  
Olivier Pascalis ◽  
Francesca Simion

The current study aimed at investigating own- vs. other-species preferences in 3-month-old infants. The infants’ eye movements were recorded during a visual preference paradigm to assess whether they show a preference for own-species faces when contrasted with other-species faces. Human and monkey faces, equated for all low-level perceptual characteristics, were used. Our results demonstrated that 3-month-old infants preferred the human face, suggesting that the face perception system becomes species-specific after 3 months of visual experience with a specific class of faces. The eye tracking results are also showing that fixations were more focused on the eye area of human faces, supporting the notion of their importance in holding visual attention.


PeerJ ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. e11380
Author(s):  
Giovanni Federico ◽  
Donatella Ferrante ◽  
Francesco Marcatto ◽  
Maria Antonella Brandimonte

Do we look at persons currently or previously affected by COVID-19 the same way as we do with healthy ones? In this eye-tracking study, we investigated how participants (N = 54) looked at faces of individuals presented as “COVID-19 Free”, “Sick with COVID-19”, or “Recovered from COVID-19”. Results showed that participants tend to look at the eyes of COVID-19-free faces longer than at those of both COVID-19-related faces. Crucially, we also found an increase of visual attention for the mouth of the COVID-19-related faces, possibly due to the threatening characterisation of such area as a transmission vehicle for SARS-CoV-2. Thus, by detailing how people dynamically changed the way of looking at faces as a function of the perceived risk of contagion, we provide the first evidence in the literature about the impact of the pandemic on the most basic level of social interaction.


2013 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa M. Oakes ◽  
Heidi A. Baumgartner ◽  
Frederick S. Barrett ◽  
Ian M. Messenger ◽  
Steven J. Luck

Ophthalmology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 116 (9) ◽  
pp. 1835
Author(s):  
Augustinus Laude ◽  
Chaham Alalouch ◽  
Baljean Dhillon ◽  
Peter A. Aspinall
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-165
Author(s):  
Masahiro Hirai ◽  
Yukako Muramatsu ◽  
Miho Nakamura

Previous studies show that newborn infants and adults orient their attention preferentially toward human faces. However, the developmental changes of visual attention captured by face stimuli remain unclear, especially when an explicit top-down process is involved. We capitalized on a visual search paradigm to assess how the relative strength of visual attention captured by a non-target face stimulus and explicit attentional control on a target stimulus evolve as search progresses and how this process changes during development. Ninety children aged 5–14 years searched for a target within an array of distractors, which occasionally contained an upright face. To assess the precise picture of developmental changes, we measured: (1) manual responses, such as reaction time and accuracy; and (2) eye movements such as the location of the first fixation, which reflect the attentional profile at the initial stage, and looking times, which reflect the attentional profile at the later period of searching. Both reaction time and accuracy were affected by the presence of the target-unrelated face, though the interference effect was observed consistently across ages. However, developmental changes were captured by the first fixation proportion, suggesting that initial attention was preferentially directed towards the target-unrelated face before 6.9 years of age. Furthermore, prior to 12.8 years of age, the first fixation towards face stimuli was significantly more frequent than for object stimuli. In contrast, the looking time proportion for the face stimuli was significantly higher than that for the objects across all ages. These findings suggest that developmental changes do not influence the later search periods during a trial, but that they influence the initial orienting indexed by the first fixation. Moreover, the manual responses are tightly linked to eye movement behaviors.


Ophthalmology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 116 (2) ◽  
pp. 355-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huy Tu Nguyen ◽  
Derek M. Isaacowitz ◽  
Peter A.D. Rubin
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabrina Karl ◽  
Magdalena Boch ◽  
Anna Zamansky ◽  
Dirk van der Linden ◽  
Isabella C. Wagner ◽  
...  

AbstractBehavioural studies revealed that the dog–human relationship resembles the human mother–child bond, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we report the results of a multi-method approach combining fMRI (N = 17), eye-tracking (N = 15), and behavioural preference tests (N = 24) to explore the engagement of an attachment-like system in dogs seeing human faces. We presented morph videos of the caregiver, a familiar person, and a stranger showing either happy or angry facial expressions. Regardless of emotion, viewing the caregiver activated brain regions associated with emotion and attachment processing in humans. In contrast, the stranger elicited activation mainly in brain regions related to visual and motor processing, and the familiar person relatively weak activations overall. While the majority of happy stimuli led to increased activation of the caudate nucleus associated with reward processing, angry stimuli led to activations in limbic regions. Both the eye-tracking and preference test data supported the superior role of the caregiver’s face and were in line with the findings from the fMRI experiment. While preliminary, these findings indicate that cutting across different levels, from brain to behaviour, can provide novel and converging insights into the engagement of the putative attachment system when dogs interact with humans.


2020 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 339-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoxue Fu ◽  
Santiago Morales ◽  
Vanessa LoBue ◽  
Kristin A. Buss ◽  
Koraly Pérez‐Edgar

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 686-701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronak Chhaya ◽  
Jonathan Weiss ◽  
Victoria Seffren ◽  
Alla Sikorskii ◽  
Paula M. Winke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document