Sampled-based estimation of diversity sensu stricto by transforming Hurlbert diversities into effective number of species

Ecography ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 661-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilles Dauby ◽  
Olivier J. Hardy
Phytotaxa ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 297 (3) ◽  
pp. 285 ◽  
Author(s):  
GIDEON F. SMITH ◽  
ESTRELA FIGUEIREDO ◽  
STEVEN MOLTENO

Phylogenetic studies in the Xanthorrhoeaceae subfam. Asphodeloideae (alternatively Asphodelaceae subfam. Alooideae) (Treutlein et al. 2003a, b; Grace et al. 2013; Manning et al. 2014) indicated that the genus Haworthia Duval (1809: 7) sensu lato should be split into three genera. The three haworthioid genera established and widely accepted for the three groups of species are: Haworthia sensu stricto, Haworthiopsis Rowley (2013: 4), and Tulista Rafinesque (1840: 137). In terms of number of species, Tulista is the smallest of the three genera and is widely considered to include five species. For four of these, T. marginata (Lamarck 1783: 89) Rowley (2013: 6), T. minima (Aiton 1789: 468) Boatwright & Manning in Manning et al. (2014: 70), T. opalina (Hayashi 2001: 17) Breuer (2016: 7), and T. pumila (Linnaeus 1753: 322) Rowley (2013: 6), combinations have been validly published. However, for the fifth species, Haworthia kingiana Von Poellnitz (1937: 203), a valid combination has yet to be published in Tulista. We do so here.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vaishali Vasudeva ◽  
J.K. Garg ◽  
Ruchi Badola ◽  
Syed Ainul Hussain

AbstractDamming and diverting river water alters the channel characteristics and natural flow regime. The change in biotic and abiotic factors results in dissimilar habitat conditions upstream and downstream of the barrage. Given the habitat dissimilarity and therefore resource availability, we hypothesized the dissimilarity in waterbird abundance and species diversity in the river habitat upstream and downstream of the barrage. The study was conducted on a 24 km stretch of Ganga River at Narora, Uttar Pradesh, India. This stretch overlaps with a Ramsar site as well as an Important Bird and Biodiversity Area (IBA). Bird sampling was done using transect count method for summer and winter season in 2017. The abundance was studied in relation to three habitat variables viz. channel depth, channel width and anthropogenic disturbances using Generalized Linear Model. A total of 140 species of birds were recorded. There was statistically significant difference in the abundance of waterbirds between upstream and downstream stretch in winter season (Mann-Whitney U, p < 0.05). During winters, migratory waterbirds especially ducks and geese occupied the deep water upstream of barrage, while the downstream was mostly occupied by terns and cormorants. Waterbird species diversity was higher in downstream during winters (Effective Number of Species=28; Shannon’s Index= 3.35) and higher in upstream during summer (Effective Number of Species=25, Shannon’s Index=2.87). Channel width, channel depth and anthropogenic disturbance influenced waterbird abundance in both the seasons (Generalized Linear Model; p < 0.05). The influence of channel depth varied with season for the upstream stretch.


2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krzysztof Bartoszek

AbstractIn this paper I address the question — how large is a phylogenetic sample? I propose a definition of a phylogenetic effective sample size for Brownian motion and Ornstein–Uhlenbeck processes — the regression effective sample size. I discuss how mutual information can be used to define an effective sample size in the non-normal process case and compare these two definitions to an already present concept of effective sample size (the mean effective sample size). Through a simulation study I find that the AICc is robust if one corrects for the number of species or effective number of species. Lastly I discuss how the concept of the phylogenetic effective sample size can be useful for biodiversity quantification, identification of interesting clades and deciding on the importance of phylogenetic correlations.


2015 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory Sergeevich Potapov ◽  
Yulia S. Kolosova ◽  
Alexander V. Kondakov

<p>Bumblebee assemblages of ruderal habitats were studied in the Kola Peninsula in 2012. The number of species in the assemblages varies from 7 to 11. Of cryptic species <em>Bombus</em> sensu stricto in the Kola Peninsula only Bombus cryptarum was registered. The most abundant species in the study habitats are <em>B. jonellus</em> and <em>B. cryptarum</em>. Abundances of tundra species <em>B. lapponicus</em>, <em>B. alpinus</em>, <em>B. balteatus</em> are low in all localities. <em>B. distinguendus</em> and <em>B. veteranus</em> are southern immigrants in the region. Ruderal habitats in the Kola Peninsula are potentially important for bumblebee conservation.</p><p> </p>


2010 ◽  
Vol 365 (1558) ◽  
pp. 3599-3609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Chao ◽  
Chun-Huo Chiu ◽  
Lou Jost

We propose a parametric class of phylogenetic diversity (PD) measures that are sensitive to both species abundance and species taxonomic or phylogenetic distances. This work extends the conventional parametric species-neutral approach (based on ‘effective number of species’ or Hill numbers) to take into account species relatedness, and also generalizes the traditional phylogenetic approach (based on ‘total phylogenetic length’) to incorporate species abundances. The proposed measure quantifies ‘the mean effective number of species’ over any time interval of interest, or the ‘effective number of maximally distinct lineages’ over that time interval. The product of the measure and the interval length quantifies the ‘branch diversity’ of the phylogenetic tree during that interval. The new measures generalize and unify many existing measures and lead to a natural definition of taxonomic diversity as a special case. The replication principle (or doubling property), an important requirement for species-neutral diversity, is generalized to PD. The widely used Rao's quadratic entropy and the phylogenetic entropy do not satisfy this essential property, but a simple transformation converts each to our measures, which do satisfy the property. The proposed approach is applied to forest data for interpreting the effects of thinning.


2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 437-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Vilte ◽  
R M Gleiser ◽  
M Battán Horenstein

Abstract The assembly of species that colonize animal organic matter, their relative abundance, and dynamics are affected by the environmental and biogeographical conditions to which these resources are exposed. Baited trap studies are essential for research on the diversity, seasonality, distribution and population dynamics of necrophagous flies. Decomposing baits provide the necessary stimulus for flies to aggregate on them. In this study, three types of bait of animal origin with different organic chemical composition were compared in terms of the diversity, richness, abundance, and species composition of saprophagous flies species that were attracted to them. Bone-meal (BM), cow liver (CL), and rotten chicken viscera (CV) were used as bait to collect flies. In total, 3,387 Calliphoridae, Sarcophagidae, and Muscidae adult flies were collected. The most abundant species were Lucilia ochricornis (Wiedemann 1830), Chrysomya albiceps (Wiedemann 1819) (Diptera: Calliphoridae), Peckia (Sarcodexia) lambens (Wiedemann 1830) (Diptera: Sarcophagidae), and Ophyra capensis (Wiedemann 1818) (Diptera: Muscidae). The type of bait had significant effects on both the total richness (F2,18 = 57.08; P &lt; 0.0001) and the effective number of species (F2,18 = 12.81; P = 0.0003) per trap. The average richness was higher in traps baited with chicken viscera, followed by cow liver and finally by bone-meal. The composition of cow liver and bone meal species constitute subsets of the species collected with chicken viscera, thus using the three baits would not increase the number of species detected. These results indicate that chicken viscera is the most efficient bait for testing or assessing necrophagous fly diversity.


Author(s):  
Lou Jost

The concept of biological diversity has evolved from a simple count of species to more sophisticated measures that are sensitive to relative abundances and even to evolutionary divergence times between species. In the course of this evolution, diversity measures have often been borrowed from other disciplines. Biological reasoning about diversity often implicitly assumed that measures of diversity had certain mathematical properties, but most of biology’s traditional diversity measures did not actually possess these properties, a situation which often led to mathematically and biologically invalid inferences. Biologists now usually transform the traditional measures to «effective number of species», whose mathematics does support most of the rules of inference that biologists apply to them. Effective number of species, then, seems to capture most (though not all) of what biologists mean by diversity.


2018 ◽  
pp. 41-47
Author(s):  
Cezary Suszyński
Keyword(s):  

Artykuł jest teoretycznym studium wspartym odniesieniami do praktyki zarządzania, którego celem jest przedstawienie argumentacji na rzecz tezy o kreatywności organizacyjnej jako imperatywie i zarazem atrybucie współczesnego przedsiębiorstwa (sensu largo). Obszarem studiów są wybrane teorie ekonomiczne (klasyczna, neoklasyczna, schumpeterowska, instytucjonalna) oraz niektóre koncepcje na gruncie zarządzania strategicznego (strategia jako: wzorzec, zestaw kluczowych kompetencji, zasobów i umiejętności przedsiębiorstwa, przełomowe innowacje, współkreowanie wartości). Analiza uwzględniająca obie perspektywy ujawnia immanentny charakter kreatywności organizacyjnej w procesach wzrostu i rozwoju przedsiębiorstw, zwłaszcza od fazy wykształcenia się zarządzania strategicznego. Wyraźnie rosnąca dynamika zmian (turbulencji) otoczenia przedsiębiorstw skłania je do sięgania po nowe rozwiązania w zakresie idei, koncepcji, zasobów, strategii, modeli biznesu, nadając organizacyjnej kreatywności charakter atrybutu współczesnego przedsiębiorstwa. Dodatkowy wniosek w świetle poczynionych konstatacji co do atrybutowego charakteru kreatywności organizacyjnej wskazuje również jako dyskusyjne spotykane w literaturze przedmiotu określenie "przedsiębiorstwo kreatywne", stosowane w odniesieniu do grupy przedsiębiorstw (sensu stricto) reprezentujących sektory (branże, przemysły) kreatywne. (


2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 47-54
Author(s):  
K. K. Holoborodko ◽  
V. O. Makhina ◽  
K. S. Buchnieva ◽  
O. E. Pakhomov

Floodplain valley of the Dnieper river midstream is a unique natural complex, having a great bìogeographical, ecological, environmental, historical and recreational values. In 1990, the Natural reserve «Dniprovsko-Orilsky» was established within the area. The Natural reserve «Dniprovsko-Orilsky» is environmentally protected site within the Dnipropetrovsk region, Dnipropetrovsk oblast, Ukraine. This reserve occupies part of the Dnieper river valley and marshy and reedy banks of Protovch river (existing bed of Oril river). It was created by Regulation of the Council of Ministers of the USSR of 15 September 1990, No. 262, based on common zoological and ornitological Nature reserves «Taromskì plavni» and «Obukhovskie zaplavy». On the territory of the Natural reserve «Dniprovsko-Orilsky», they were registered 32 Lepidoptera species listed in the List of Threatened Species at different categories (5 species in IUCN Red List ; 18 in Red Data Book of Ukraine; 7 in European Red List of plants and animals endangered on a global scale; 31 in Red Book of Dnipropetrovsk oblast). The main scientific materials were author’s collections from area of research and materials of entomological funds, Department of Zoology and Ecology, Oles Honchar Dnipropetrovsk National University (mostly Memorial Collection of V. O. Barsov). Field surveys covered all the ecosystems basic on size and degree of protection. The author’s researches have conducted over the past decade during annual expeditions to the Reserve. Taxonomic structure of the complex is quite diverse, and represented by all the major families of higher millers and rhopalocera, having protectedstatus. In relation to taxonomy, this complex formed by representatives of five superfamilies (Zyganoidea, Noctuoidea, Bombycoidea, Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) from 11 families (Zygaenidae, Saturniidae, Sphingidae, Noctuidae Arctiidae Hesperiidae, Papilionidae, Pieridae, Nymphalidae, Satyridae, Lycaenidae). High taxonomic diversity can be explained by unique geographical location of the reserve in azonal conditions of the Dnieper river valley. Such location allows to enter different zoogeographic Lepidoptera groups on the reserve territory. Zoogeographic analysis of species protected within the reserve territory selected 7 basic groups. It was found that most of the globally rare species have Mediterranean origin (39 %); species of Palearctic origin are in second place (22 %); Western Palearctic and Ponto-Kazakh types of areas are same of number of species, and come third (11 %); and others come 17 % (European, Euro-Siberian, and Holarctic). This fauna component is specific due to presence of so-called «northern» species that make up 40 % (representatives of Palearctic, Western Palearctic, Euro-Siberian, European and Holarctic groups). Their existence within the reserve territory is only possible due to development of boreal valley ecosystems. High taxonomic diversity can be explained by unique geographical location of the reserve in azonal conditions of the Dnieper river valley. Such location allows to enter different zoogeographic Lepidoptera groups on the reserve territory. Zoogeographic analysis of species protected within the reserve territory selected 7 basic groups. It was found that most of the globally rare species have Mediterranean origin (39 %); species of Palearctic origin are in second place (22 %); Western Palearctic and Ponto-Kazakh types of areas are same of number of species, and come third (11 %); and others come 17 % (European, Euro-Siberian, and Holarctic). This fauna component is specific due to presence of so-called «northern» species that make up 40 % (representatives of Palearctic, Western Palearctic, Euro-Siberian, European and Holarctic groups). Their existence within the reserve territory is only possible due to development of boreal valley ecosystems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document