Vancomycin Resistant Enterococcus in Geriatric hospitals and Long Term Care Facilities: Implications for practitioners

2001 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-102
Author(s):  
Mahesan Anpalahan ◽  
Peteris Darzins
Keyword(s):  
Long Term Care ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant Enterococcus ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant

scholarly journals Patients in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Reservoir for Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci

2002 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 441-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marnie L. Elizaga ◽  
Robert A. Weinstein ◽  
Mary K. Hayden
Keyword(s):  
Long Term Care ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant

Evidence of Delays in Transferring Patients With Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus or Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus to Long-Term–Care Facilities

2000 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 270-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Bryce ◽  
Shelley M. Tiffin ◽  
Judith L. Isaac-Renton ◽  
Charles J. Wright
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant ◽  
Control Study

This retrospective case-control study examined whether there was a difference in length of time awaiting long-term-care lacement for patients identified as having methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus compared to controls. Thirty-nine patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus waited for placement an average of 61 days longer than controls (P<.0002). The average number of requests for placement was 2.5 compared to 1.7 for controls (P=.015).

Lack of Transmission of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci in Three Long-Term–Care Facilities

1999 ◽  
Vol 20 (05) ◽  
pp. 341-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina A. Greenaway ◽  
Mark A. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Infection Control ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Point Prevalence ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Infection Control Measures ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant

Abstract Three patients colonized with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus were admitted to one or more of three long-term-care facilities. Six point-prevalence surveys revealed no transmission of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus after a total of 234 days of exposure during which moderately strict infection control measures were implemented. Four of 116 environmental cultures were positive.

Survey of Long-Term-Care Facilities in Iowa for Policies and Practices Regarding Residents With Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus or Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci

2005 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 811-815 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trisha Kreman ◽  
Jianfang Hu ◽  
Jean Pottinger ◽  
Loreen A. Herwaldt
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant ◽  
Policies And Practices

AbstractObjectives:To identify infection control policies and practices used by long-term-care facilities (LTCFs) in Iowa for residents with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), and to estimate the prevalence of residents known to have these organisms.Design:Survey.Setting:LTCFs in Iowa from December 2002 through March 2003.Results:Of the 429 LTCFs in Iowa, 331 (77%) responded to the survey. The estimated prevalence of residents known to have MRSA was 13.4 per 1,000 and that of residents known to have VRE was 2.3 per 1,000. Facilities owned by the government or those with an average of more than 86 occupied beds were more likely to have residents known to have MRSA and VRE (P = .002 and .007, respectively). Of the responding facilities, 7.3% acknowledged that they refused to accept individuals known to have MRSA and 16.9% acknowledged that they refused to accept those known to have VRE. Facilities in large communities (population, > 100,000) were least likely to deny admission to an individual known to have either MRSA or VRE (P = .05). Most facilities reported adhering to the national guidelines, but fewer than half (44.7%) of the respondents had heard of the Iowa Antibiotic Resistance Task Force's guidelines regarding residents with MRSA or VRE.Conclusions:Many LTCFs in Iowa care for residents known to have MRSA or VRE, but some refuse to admit these individuals. Infection control personnel and public health officials should work together to educate LTCF staff so that residents receive proper care and resistant organisms do not spread within this setting.

Colonization with Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium: Comparison of a Long-Term-Care Unit with an Acute-Care Hospital

1997 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 333-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hector F. Bonilla ◽  
Marcus A. Zervos ◽  
Michael J. Lyons ◽  
Suzanne F. Bradley ◽  
Sara A. Hedderwick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Enterococcus Faecium ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Acute Care Hospital ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant Enterococcus ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant

scholarly journals Comparative Epidemiology of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci Colonization in an Acute-Care Hospital and Its Affiliated Intermediate- and Long-Term Care Facilities in Singapore

2018 ◽  
Vol 62 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Damon Tan ◽  
Htet Lin Htun ◽  
Jocelyn Koh ◽  
Kala Kanagasabai ◽  
Jia-Wei Lim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Independent Risk Factors ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant

ABSTRACTVancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are an important cause of nosocomial infections in acute-care hospitals (ACHs), intermediate-care facilities (ITCFs), and long-term care facilities (LTCFs). This study contemporaneously compared the epidemiology and risk factors for VRE colonization in different care settings in a health care network. We conducted a serial cross-sectional study in a 1,700-bed ACH and its six closely affiliated ITCFs and LTCFs in June and July of 2014 to 2016. Rectal swab or stool specimens were cultured for VRE. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess for independent risk factors associated with VRE colonization. Of 5,357 participants, 523 (9.8%) were VRE colonized. VRE prevalence was higher in ACHs (14.2%) than in ITCFs (7.6%) and LTCFs (0.8%). Common risk factors between ACHs and ITCFs included prior VRE carriage, a longer duration of antibiotic therapy, surgery in the preceding 90 days, and the presence of a skin ulcer. Independent risk factors specific to ACH-admitted patients were prior methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureuscarriage, a higher number of beds per room, prior proton pump inhibitor use, and a length of stay of >14 days. For ITCFs, a length of stay of >14 days was inversely associated with VRE colonization. Similarities and differences in risk factors for VRE colonization were observed between health care settings. VRE prevention efforts should target the respective high-risk patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document