Acral lentiginous melanoma and mucosal melanoma expressed less programmed‐death 1 ligand than cutaneous melanoma: a retrospective study of 73 Japanese melanoma patients

Author(s):  
Y. Nakamura ◽  
Y. Ishitsuka ◽  
R. Tanaka ◽  
N. Okiyama ◽  
A. Saito ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 226-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra P. D’Angelo ◽  
James Larkin ◽  
Jeffrey A. Sosman ◽  
Celeste Lebbé ◽  
Benjamin Brady ◽  
...  

Purpose Mucosal melanoma is an aggressive malignancy with a poor response to conventional therapies. The efficacy and safety of nivolumab (a programmed death-1 checkpoint inhibitor), alone or combined with ipilimumab (a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 checkpoint inhibitor), have not been reported in this rare melanoma subtype. Patients and Methods Data were pooled from 889 patients who received nivolumab monotherapy in clinical studies, including phase III trials; 86 (10%) had mucosal melanoma and 665 (75%) had cutaneous melanoma. Data were also pooled for patients who received nivolumab combined with ipilimumab (n = 35, mucosal melanoma; n = 326, cutaneous melanoma). Results Among patients who received nivolumab monotherapy, median progression-free survival was 3.0 months (95% CI, 2.2 to 5.4 months) and 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.1 to 7.5 months) for mucosal and cutaneous melanoma, with objective response rates of 23.3% (95% CI, 14.8% to 33.6%) and 40.9% (95% CI, 37.1% to 44.7%), respectively. Median progression-free survival in patients treated with nivolumab combined with ipilimumab was 5.9 months (95% CI, 2.8 months to not reached) and 11.7 months (95% CI, 8.9 to 16.7 months) for mucosal and cutaneous melanoma, with objective response rates of 37.1% (95% CI, 21.5% to 55.1%) and 60.4% (95% CI, 54.9% to 65.8%), respectively. For mucosal and cutaneous melanoma, respectively, the incidence of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events was 8.1% and 12.5% for nivolumab monotherapy and 40.0% and 54.9% for combination therapy. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the largest analysis of data for anti–programmed death-1 therapy in mucosal melanoma to date. Nivolumab combined with ipilimumab seemed to have greater efficacy than either agent alone, and although the activity was lower in mucosal melanoma, the safety profile was similar between subtypes.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9516-9516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Ramella Munhoz ◽  
Alexander Noor Shoushtari ◽  
Deborah Kuk ◽  
Patrick Alexander Ott ◽  
Douglas Buckner Johnson ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14300-e14300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xianling Guo ◽  
Song Gao ◽  
Li Yang ◽  
Juemin Fang ◽  
Guochao Wei ◽  
...  

e14300 Background: Acral and mucosal melanoma are rare subtypes accounting for about 3% of all melanoma cases. The cutaneous melanoma genomic landscape is well defined; however, little is known about the acral and mucosal melanoma mutational spectrum. In this pilot study, we evaluated the genomic and neo-antigen profiles and tumor mutational burden (TMB) from acral and mucosal melanoma patients with the aim of designing personalized vaccines and longitudinally tracking patients’ clinical courses. Methods: Tumor whole exome sequencing and neo-antigen profiling of 5 acral and 3 mucosal melanoma patients at Shanghai Tenth Peoples Hospital, Tongji University, China between April 2018 and January 2019 was performed using YuceBio’s proprietary analytics platform. Watsonä for Genomics, an artificial intelligence decision-support system, was used for variant interpretation and annotation. A comparative analysis was performed on Chinese acral melanoma data with the published Caucasian acral cohort from the Translational Genomics Research Institute (TGen) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) predominantly Caucasian cutaneous melanoma data set. Results: TMB in our acral/mucosal melanoma cohort was 2.26/Megabase (Mb) compared to over 20/Mb in published cutaneous melanoma studies. Tumor neo-antigen burden (TNAB) in our group was 1.03 neo-epitopes/Mb. Low TNAB levels were associated with low TMB levels in all tumors. Incidence of BRAF and NRAS mutant cases in our cohort was 0% (0/8) and 13% (1/8) respectively compared to 19% (5/27) and 7% (2/27) of the Caucasian acral population in the TGen dataset. Incidence of BRAF and NRAS mutations in the TCGA cutaneous melanoma dataset was 54% (237/440) and 28% (125/440), respectively. Conclusions: TMB was significantly lower in acral/mucosal than in cutaneous melanoma and may be a surrogate for TNAB. Detection of BRAF and NRAS mutations, the two most prevalent driver mutations in cutaneous melanoma, were significantly lower frequencies in both Chinese and Caucasian acral melanoma patients in this study, suggesting alternate cancer drivers may exist in this subtype. Strategies to address challenges of low TNAB in vaccine development are being explored.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14510-e14510
Author(s):  
Matthew R. Zibelman ◽  
Julia Judd ◽  
Elizabeth Handorf ◽  
John O'Neill ◽  
Sasini Bentota ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiya Handa ◽  
Junji Kato ◽  
Yasuyuki Sumikawa ◽  
Tokimasa Hida ◽  
Kohei Horimoto ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiyuki Nakamura ◽  
Zhu Zhenjie ◽  
Kazumasa Oya ◽  
Ryota Tanaka ◽  
Yosuke Ishitsuka ◽  
...  

Recent clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for treating melanoma. However, these previous studies comprised mainly Caucasian populations, in which cutaneous melanoma (CM) is the major clinical type. In contrast, Asian populations have a distinct profile of melanoma and show much higher frequencies of acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM) and mucosal melanoma (MCM). Compared with CM, ALM and MCM show poorer response to ICIs, but the mechanisms have not been fully understood. To evaluate the immune status in each melanoma subtype, we examined the number of total tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), CD4+ TILs, CD8+ TILs, and tumor-infiltrating FoxP3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) to evaluate the immune status in each melanoma subtype using data from 137 patients with melanoma. Total TIL numbers in ALM and MCM were significantly lower than that in CM. CD4+ TIL number in MCM was also lower than CM although CD4+ TIL number in ALM was comparable with CM. In contrast, CD8+ TIL numbers in both ALM and MCM were significantly lower than that in CM. Although number of tumor-infiltrating Tregs was comparable among the 3 subtypes, the proportion of tumor-infiltrating Tregs in CD4+ T cells in MCM was significantly higher than in CM and ALM. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that ALM and MCM were significantly associated with a lower total TIL number, but only MCM was significantly associated with a lower CD4+ TIL number. Multivariate regression analysis also revealed that both ALM and MCM were significantly associated with a lower CD8+ TIL number. Our results suggest that both ALM and MCM are independent factors of lower total TIL number, which may be associated with poorer responses to ICIs in ALM and MCM.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document